FERC Requires All Generators To File Rate Schedules To Provide Reactive Power Service, Even if the Service Is Uncompensated

Oct 24, 2013

Reading Time : 2 min

FERC’s decision arose out of a long-running proceeding in which Chehalis Power Generating L.P. (Chehalis) had proposed an initial rate schedule establishing the rates for it to provide reactive power service to Bonneville Power Administration (BPA).  FERC concluded that Chehalis’s rate schedule was not an initial rate, because Chehalis had previously been providing that service to BPA pursuant to an interconnection agreement, albeit free of charge.  FERC concluded that Chehalis’s proposal was for a “change in rates” rather than an “initial rate,” and thus its changed rate was subject to the suspension and refund provisions of Section 205(e) of the Federal Power Act.  FERC emphasized that an initial rate involves a new customer and a new service, whereas Chehalis had already been providing reactive power service to BPA under the interconnection agreement. 

Chehalis appealed the FERC decision to the U.S. Court of Appeal for the D.C. Circuit (D.C. Circuit), which remanded the case to FERC on the single issue as to whether Chehalis’s rate schedule should have been filed with FERC.  On remand, FERC concluded that Chehalis’s rate for the service it provided to BPA should have been filed, making Chehalis’s rate  a “changed rate” subject to suspension and refund.

Chehalis again appealed the FERC decision to the D.C. Circuit.  On voluntary remand, FERC reaffirmed in the October 17 order that Chehalis should have filed a rate schedule governing its provision of reactive power service under the interconnection agreement, thus making its filing a changed rate rather than an initial rate.  However, FERC recognized that there had been some uncertainty with respect to its previous policy, and therefore clarified that, on a prospective basis, both existing and new generators providing jurisdictional reactive power services (including uncompensated services under an interconnection agreement) must do so pursuant to a FERC-filed rate schedule.  FERC also clarified that it would not impose sanctions for a generator’s failure, prior to the October 17 order, to have a rate schedule on file for reactive power service provided without compensation.

FERC directed its staff to conduct a workshop to explore the mechanics for generators to file the required rate schedules when there is no compensation. The details of the workshop will be announced at a later date.

Share This Insight

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.