Share-Based Compensation Update to SEC’s Financial Reporting Manual

Mar 5, 2014

Reading Time : 2 min

Before the update, Section 9520 indicated that when estimates used to determine stock-based compensation were considered critical,  the SEC’s practice was to request that companies consider providing a table that disclosed certain detailed information about the award instruments. For instance, the tabular disclosure would specify (1) the number of instruments granted during the twelve-month period preceding the most recent balance sheet date, (2) the exercise price of these instruments, (3) the fair value of the stock underlying the instruments, and (4) the fair value of these instruments. Additionally, under the previous Section 9520, companies were asked to consider providing narrative disclosures that would describe factors contributing to any significant changes in the fair values of the underlying stock during the twelve-month period preceding the most recent balance sheet date and any changes in assumptions that affected the fair value of the underlying stock.

As updated, Section 9520 deletes the reference to the tabular and narrative disclosure. Instead, Section 9520 indicates that when a company is performing estimates of the value of share-based compensation, the  SEC will consider whether the company is providing the following disclosures in its IPO prospectus relating to critical accounting estimates:

1. The methods that management used to determine the fair value of the company’s shares and the nature of the material assumptions involved.
2. The extent to which such estimates are considered highly complex and subjective.
3. The fact that once the company’s shares begin trading, the estimates will no longer be necessary to determine the fair value of any new awards.

As a result, revised Section 9520 contemplates less detailed disclosure regarding the methodology used to estimate the values of pre-IPO share-based compensation awards. However, Section 9520.2 specifically notes that the SEC may issue comment letters asking a company to explain the reasons for valuations if the valuations appear unusual. For instance, an abnormally steep increase in the fair value of the underlying shares leading up to the IPO could possibly trigger such a comment. According to the Financial Reporting Manual, the intent of such comments is to draw further analyses from the company that will help the SEC confirm whether the company has appropriately accounted for the share-based compensation. In addition to critical accounting estimates, revised Section 9520 indicates that the SEC will also consider whether the MD&A relating to share-based compensation sufficiently discloses the possible effects of any known trends or uncertainties, such as the impact on operating results and taxes.

Although the Financial Reporting Manual is informal and creates no substantive disclosure rules, it serves as a useful resource for practitioners who are assisting companies in the preparation of SEC filings. Accordingly, when preparing an IPO prospectus, a company should consider the updated guidance relating to share-based compensation. Notwithstanding this update, in some cases, such as when the IPO price of a company’s equity securities significantly exceeds their estimated fair value shortly before the IPO, a company may decide that the tabular and narrative disclosure similar to that previously suggested in prior Section 9520 provides the SEC with the desired assurance that the company has properly accounted for share-based compensation expense. Indeed, by preemptively providing the SEC with such detailed information, the company may avoid delays resulting from comment letters.

Share This Insight

Categories

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

April 12, 2023

Read More

Deal Diary

2022-12-15

On December 14, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. The amendments aim to strengthen investor protections concerning insider trading and to help shareholders understand when and how insiders are trading in securities for which they may at times have material nonpublic information (MNPI). In light of these amendments, issuers should review and revise, if needed, their insider trading policies and equity grant policies.

Read more.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.