California Court of Appeals Rules CPPA Can Start Enforcing Regulations

February 16, 2024

Reading Time : 2 min

On February 9, 2024, California’s Third District Court of Appeals ruled that the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) may begin enforcing its finalized data privacy regulations immediately, overturning the lower court’s prior ruling that delayed enforcement.

The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), tasks the CPPA with promulgating regulations by July 1, 2022, and permits the CPPA to enforce such regulations beginning July 1, 2023. The CPPA failed to finalize the regulations by the statutory deadline, instead issuing final regulations on 12 (out of 15) subject matter areas1 on March 29, 2023. Nevertheless, the agency still aimed to commence enforcement on July 1, 2023, leaving businesses with only three months to comply with the regulations.

The California Chamber of Commerce (the Chamber) filed suit to delay the enforcement, arguing that the voters had intended for enforcement of the regulations to take place 12 months after their finalization. The lower court agreed with the Chamber’s argument, ruling on June 30, 2023, that the CPPA must delay enforcement of the regulations it issued on March 29, 2023, until March 29, 2024.2 Though the Appellate Court acknowledged that the CPPA did not meet the required deadline, it overturned the lower court’s decision based on its finding that the CCPA does not expressly mandate a one-year gap between approval of the final regulations and enforcement, and there is no basis to believe voters intended such a gap.3 Instead of March 29, 2024, the court decided that the agency’s enforcement authority should have gone into effect on July 1, 2023.

With this decision, the CPPA can now begin enforcing its regulations, instead of waiting one year after the regulations are finalized. Prior to the ruling, we have already seen CCPA enforcement activity pick up in the new year with the California Attorney General’s announcement of an investigative sweep into the CCPA compliance of streaming services on January 26, 2024. The CPPA’s press release on the ruling also appears to signal its intent to enforce the regulations with Deputy Director of Enforcement, Michael Macko stating that the decision “should serve as an important reminder to the regulated community: now would be a good time to review your privacy practices to ensure full compliance with all of our regulations.” Companies should move quickly to examine and adapt their privacy programs (see here for our previous post on current CPPA rulemaking).

We will continue to monitor developments in this space as well as the CPPA public meetings. Please contact a member of Akin’s cybersecurity, privacy and data protection team to learn more about how these incoming regulations may affect your company.


1 The three remaining areas concern cybersecurity audits, risk assessments and automated decision-making technology.

2 California Chamber of Commerce v. California Privacy Protection Agency, 34-2023-80004106-CU-WM-GDS (Cal. Super. June 30, 2023) available at (https://www.akingump.com/a/web/t7mbsz8AwtcTyWt1U4Srr5/california_chamber_of_commerce_v_california_privacy_protection_agency.pdf).

3 California Privacy Protection Agency v. Super. Ct. of Sacramento Cnty., C099130 (Cal. Ct. App. February 9, 2024), available at (https://www.akingump.com/a/web/6ZGnx1MeXfDhwBjdbKwD3A/california_privacy_protection_agency_v_superior_court_of_sacramento_county.pdf.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Data Dive

October 17, 2024

During the course of any lending transaction, lenders will conduct a due diligence review of the borrower, including reviewing any relevant “know-your-customer” information. In the context of a fund finance transaction, this due diligence is likely to include a review of fund organizational documents, subscription agreements and side letters, if any, from the fund’s investors. Providing this information to lenders is an essential and practical aspect of incurring any fund-level financing, and is often expressly permitted by a fund’s governing documentation. Especially in the context of a subscription credit facility, where investor commitments and the related right to collect capital contributions are the primary source of repayment for the loan, a lender will need to see information that could potentially include sensitive or confidential information about investors.

...

Read More

Data Dive

September 17, 2024

Following the publication of the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) on 12 July 2024, there are now a series of steps that various EU bodies need to take towards implementation. One of the first key steps is in relation to the establishment of codes of practice to “contribute to the proper application” of the AI Act.

...

Read More

Data Dive

August 6, 2024

On July 30, 2024, the Senate passed the Kids Online Safety and Privacy Act (S. 2073) via an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 91-3 shortly before departing for the August recess.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On 12 July 2024, the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act or Act) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (EU), marking the final step in the AI Act’s legislative journey. Its publication triggers the timeline for the entry into force of the myriad obligations under the AI Act, along with the deadlines we set out below. The requirement to ensure a sufficient level of AI literacy of staff dealing with the operation and use of AI systems will, for example, apply to all providers and deployers on 2 February 2025.

...

Read More

Data Dive

July 18, 2024

On June 18, 2024, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced a settlement with R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company (RRD) for alleged internal control and disclosure failures following a ransomware attack in 2021. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, the business communications and marketing services provider agreed to pay a civil penalty of over $2.1 million to settle charges alleging violations of Section 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(a).1

...

Read More

Data Dive

June 11, 2024

In May, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) issued updated recommendations for security controls for controlled unclassified information (CUI) that is processed, stored or transmitted by nonfederal organizations using nonfederal systems, (NIST Special Publication 800-171 (SP 800-171), Revision 3). These security requirements are “intended for use by federal agencies in contractual vehicles or other agreements that are established between those agencies and nonfederal organizations.”1 While these new controls are only applicable to nonfederal entities that agree to comply with the new issuance, Revision 3 signals the next phase of expected security for government contractors.

...

Read More

Data Dive

May 31, 2024

On May 21, 2024, the European Union finalized the adoption of the groundbreaking EU Artificial Intelligence Act, a comprehensive and sector-agnostic legislation that extends globally. This 420-page Act aims to regulate the deployment and development of AI systems, categorizing them into high-risk and low-risk, and even banning certain types of AI. The Act emphasizes trust, transparency, and accountability in AI usage, promoting the safe integration of AI technologies. This legislation sets a potential global benchmark for AI regulation, although its complexity may pose interpretative and implementation challenges for stakeholders. We set out the key provisions below.

...

Read More

Data Dive

May 30, 2024

On May 17, 2024, Colorado Governor Jared Polis signed into law S.B. 205, a pioneering piece of legislation aimed at regulating high-risk AI systems. This new law, set to take effect on February 1, 2026, introduces stringent requirements for AI developers and deployers, focusing on risk management and the prevention of algorithmic discrimination. This legislation marks a significant step in state-level AI regulation, potentially setting a precedent similar to the impact of GDPR on privacy laws.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.