Best Practices in Social Media for Employers Part 1 – Recruiting and Hiring

Feb 20, 2015

Reading Time : 1 min

The high percentage of recruiters using social media is not surprising to anyone involved in the hiring process.  But there are legal pitfalls to basing hiring decisions on information obtained through social media.  The risks associated with using social media in the hiring process include: 

  • potential discrimination claims
  • off-duty conduct laws
  • Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and state law compliance, including password protection laws
  • restrictive covenants.

Some employers learn about these risks and may want to opt out of using social media in the recruiting and screening process altogether.  However, not using social media could put employers at a competitive disadvantage.  So it is better to learn about how to minimize these risks.

Here is a list of best practices we suggest when using social media in the hiring process:

  • Use several different social media advertisements in conjunction with traditional recruiting efforts.
  • Consider hiring a third-party background check provider to conduct social media checks or wall off an internal individual conducting such checks.
  • Review third-party or in-house background checks for compliance with FCRA and state laws.
  • Confirm that any protected class or lawful off-duty conduct information will be filtered out of background check results.
  • Confirm that all information obtained actually belongs to or relates to the prospective employee.
  • Avoid connecting with friends of a prospective employee to view information about the candidate.

Ask about a prospective employee’s restrictive covenant agreements with prior employers and require a representation of compliance.

Share This Insight

Categories

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

April 12, 2023

Read More

Deal Diary

2022-12-15

On December 14, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. The amendments aim to strengthen investor protections concerning insider trading and to help shareholders understand when and how insiders are trading in securities for which they may at times have material nonpublic information (MNPI). In light of these amendments, issuers should review and revise, if needed, their insider trading policies and equity grant policies.

Read more.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.