The stakes will continue to rise for boards in connection with cybersecurity in 2018. The past year has redefined the upward bounds of the megabreach. The Yahoo! hack (three billion accounts) forced Yahoo! to accept a $350 million decrease in purchase price from Verizon. The Equifax hack, affecting 143+ million individuals, and exposing the social security numbers of nearly half of the adult U.S. population, resulted in the ouster of the CEO and a shakeup of the board. Additionally, the fallout from the Uber breach, affecting 57 million riders and drivers, is ongoing.
On November 2, 2017, the House of Representatives released the first draft of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Bill), which could result in the most significant overhaul of the U.S. federal tax system since 1986. Subsequently, two substantive amendments were introduced by the Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. While the Bill is expected to change substantially and the Senate version remains to be unveiled, the Bill provides certain indications as to how tax reform may affect investment funds and asset managers. Significant aspects can be summarized as follows:
This week we highlight a speech by Stephanie Avakian, Co-Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, on cybersecurity and retail investor protection. In her remarks, she addresses the key priorities of the Enforcement Division in its allocation of resources, including its focus on retail investors, cyber-related issues, the conduct of investment advisers and broker-dealers, financial fraud and disclosure issues, and insider trading.
This week we highlight two analyses, one by J.P. Morgan and the other by Ernst & Young, reviewing the 2017 proxy season. The reports address board diversity; gender equality; environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues; and the normalization of shareholder activism as high priorities and key trends for many investors and boards.
As stated in our May 25, 2017 Executive Compensation, Employee Benefits and ERISA Alert, the Department of Labor’s (DOL’s) new fiduciary rule (“Fiduciary Rule”) became partially applicable on June 9, 2017. Set forth below are a few questions that a typical private fund manager might have in response to the Fiduciary Rule, and our responses thereto.
The Fiduciary Rule, which expands the circumstances under which providers of investment advice may be considered Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) fiduciaries, was initially published in the Federal Register on April 8, 2016, became effective on June 7, 2016, and had an original applicability date of April 10, 2017. On March 2, 2017, in response to a February 3, 2017 presidential memorandum directing the DOL to re-examine the Fiduciary Rule, the DOL published a notice proposing a 60‑day delay in the applicability date of the Fiduciary Rule. On April 7, 2017, the DOL promulgated a final rule delaying the applicability date of the Fiduciary Rule by 60 days from April 10, 2017 to June 9, 2017.
Akin Gump litigation partner Charles Connolly and associates David Coleman and Abigail Kohlman have written the article “The Role of Compliance in FCPA Enforcement,” which was published by NACD Directorship magazine, the publication of the National Association of Corporate Directors.
2015-16 Compliance Developments & Calendar for Private Fund Advisers
Registered investment advisers (RIAs) are required to review their policies and procedures on at least an annual basis. As an aid to the required review and to assist with timely completion of required compliance tasks, below is a summary of material developments during the past year and a compliance calendar for the coming 12-month period.
We encourage our investment management clients to consider their regulatory filings requirements and review their policies and procedures.
Click here to read the full report.