New Trade Secret Protections to Become Law

Apr 28, 2016

Reading Time : 2 min

By: Michael P. Kahn, Ed Pagano, Anthony T. Pierce, Brian Arthur Pomper, Matthew Weiss, Law Clerk (not admitted to practice) & Taras Gach, Public Policy Specialist

The Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) amends the Economic Espionage Act (EEA) of 1996 to create a federal civil cause of action for the “misappropriation” of a trade secret. The DTSA provides an alternative in federal courts to potential state court causes of action, in an area of law where not all states apply the same standard. The DTSA did not change the scope of what constitutes a trade secret under the EEA, which includes “all forms and types of financial, business, scientific, technical, economic, or engineering information, including patterns, plans, compilations, program devices, formulas, designs, prototypes, methods, techniques, processes, procedures, programs, or codes, whether tangible or intangible….”  18 U.S.C. § 1839(3). The formula for making Coca-Cola is an example of an invaluable trade secret.

The EEA currently protects trade secrets but does not provide a private, federal civil remedy for trade secret misappropriation. While 47 states have adopted the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA), there is still not consistent application of trade secret protection across all state jurisdictions. Moreover, in a world of trade secret theft that is increasingly borderless, fast-paced and cyber-related, unified, federal treatment of this important intellectual property is necessary.

Key provisions of S. 1890 include:

Ex parte seizure. Plaintiffs fearful of their trade secrets becoming widely published or disseminated would be able to take proactive steps to have the government seize stolen information, without giving any notice of the lawsuit to the defendant. However, ex parte seizures may be done in only “extraordinary” circumstances. The legislation also allows defendants to seek relief against plaintiffs for wrongful or excessive seizure.

Damages. The legislation permits the owner of a trade secret to file a civil claim for both equitable and legal remedies. The measure of damages available under the DTSA includes for "actual loss,” for "any unjust enrichment” or “a reasonable royalty.”  In cases of willful and malicious misappropriation, the DTSA permits “exemplary damages in an amount not more than 2 times the amount of the damages awarded.” 

Period of limitations. A civil action for misappropriation “may not be commenced later than 3 years after the date on which the misappropriation  . . . is discovered or by the exercise of reasonable diligence should have been discovered.”

Whistleblower and confidential protections. The bill protects individuals who confidentially share trade secrets with law enforcement in the course of reporting a violation of the law or cooperating with an investigation. Trade secrets confidentially disclosed in a lawsuit are also protected.

Once the DTSA is signed into law, innovative companies will have a new legal process to protect some of their most valuable intellectual property by bringing a claim in federal court for misappropriated trade secrets. It is important that organizations evaluate how this new federal law will impact their businesses and risk profiles.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Akin Deal Diary

April 12, 2023

Read More

Akin Deal Diary

2022-12-15

On December 14, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. The amendments aim to strengthen investor protections concerning insider trading and to help shareholders understand when and how insiders are trading in securities for which they may at times have material nonpublic information (MNPI). In light of these amendments, issuers should review and revise, if needed, their insider trading policies and equity grant policies.

Read more.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.