SEC Proposes Amendments to Update and Simplify Certain Disclosure Requirements

Jul 22, 2016

Reading Time : 3 min

The proposed amendments would impact various provisions under Regulation S-X, Regulation S-K, certain rules and regulations adopted under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act), and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), and various forms under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. The SEC is seeking comments for 60 days following the publication of the proposal in the Federal Register.

The following summarizes the proposed categories of changes:

Redundant or Duplicative Requirements

The proposal identifies numerous disclosure requirements that require substantially the same disclosures as U.S. GAAP, IFRS or other SEC disclosure requirements. The SEC is proposing to eliminate these redundant or duplicative disclosure requirements to simplify issuer compliance efforts while providing the same information to investors. The redundant or duplicative provisions include provisions related to:

  • foreign currency disclosures
  • consolidation requirements
  • changes in amount of debt obligations
  • income tax rate disclosures
  • terms of warrants, right and convertible instruments
  • related-party transactions
  • material contingencies
  • earnings per share presentations
  • insurance company investment activities
  • bank holding company investment activities
  • reasons for changes in accounting principles
  • examples of interim financial statement adjustments
  • interim financial statements–common control transactions
  • interim financial statements–effects of discontinued operations
  • incorporation by reference of report furnished to security holders

Overlapping Requirements

The proposal identifies numerous disclosure requirements that are related to, but not the same as, U.S. GAAP, IFRS or other SEC disclosure requirements. The SEC is proposing to either: (1) delete certain disclosure requirements that convey reasonably similar information or that require incrementally different disclosure that may no longer be useful to investors; or (2) integrate certain disclosure requirements that overlap, but require additional incremental information. Alternatively, the SEC is soliciting comments on certain SEC disclosure requirements that overlap with, but require information incremental to, U.S. GAAP to determine whether to retain, modify, eliminate or refer them to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) for potential incorporation in U.S. GAAP.

The proposed deletions include provisions related to:           

  • Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) disclosures
  • consolidation of subsidiaries with different fiscal periods
  • repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements
  • derivative accounting policies
  • distributable earnings for registered investment companies
  • insurance company liability assumptions and reinsurance transactions
  • interim financial statements – material events subsequent to the end of the most recent fiscal year
  • interim financial statements – changes in accounting principles
  • interim financial statements – pro forma business combination information
  • interim financial statements – dispositions and discontinued operations reporting
  • segment reporting
  • geographic area financial information and risks
  • seasonality
  • research and development activities
  • common equity underlying warrants, rights and convertible instruments
  • dividends
  • equity compensation plans
  • ratio of earnings to fixed charges
  • invitations for competitive bids

The proposed integrations include provisions related to:      

  • foreign currency restrictions
  • restrictions on dividends and related items
  • certain financial information related to geographic areas

The proposed modifications, eliminations, or FASB referrals include provisions related to:

  • REIT disclosures – tax status of distributions
  • consolidation – material changes in consolidated entities
  • discount on shares
  • assets subject to lien
  • obligations – uncured defaults and covenant breaches, post-balance sheet debt issuances and amounts and terms of financings
  • preferred share liquidation preferences
  • income tax disclosures
  • related-party transaction disclosures and location
  • repurchase and reverse purchase agreements
  • interim financial statements – computation of earnings per share
  • interim financial statements – retroactive prior period adjustments
  • interim financial statements – common control combination transactions
  • products and services revenue disclosures and location
  • major customer disclosures and location
  • legal proceeding and loss contingencies
  • oil and gas producing activities

Outdated Requirements

The proposal identifies numerous disclosure requirements that have become obsolete as a result of the passage of time or changes in the regulatory, business or technological environment. The SEC is proposing to amend these outdated requirements with the intent of simplifying issuer compliance efforts. The identified outdated provisions include provisions related to:

  • stale transition dates
  • income tax disclosures
  • available information – SEC public reference room availability, physical address and phone number
  • market price and trading market disclosures
  • exchange rate data for foreign private issuers
  • foreign private issuer initial public offering – age of financial statements waivers.

Superseded Requirements

The proposed amendments include certain updates to SEC disclosure requirements to reflect recent legislation, updated SEC disclosure requirements and updated U.S. GAAP provisions. The identified amendments include provisions related to:

  • references to Generally Accepted Auditing Standards rather than Public Company Accounting Oversight Board standards
  • references to changes in financial position rather than cash flows
  • gain or loss on sale of properties by REITs
  • consolidation inconsistencies between Regulation S-X and U.S. GAAP
  • development-stage entity financial disclosures under Regulation S-X
  • insurance company disclosures related to statutory accounting, reinsurance recoverable on paid losses and separate account assets
  • bank holding company disclosures related to federal funds and goodwill
  • references to discontinued segments rather than discontinued operations
  • references to pooling-of-interests accounting
  • references to income statement rather than statement of comprehensive income
  • references to extraordinary items
  • references to cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles
  • references to published report regarding matters submitted to vote of security holders
  • presenting U.S. GAAP selected financial data for foreign private issuers that report under IFRS
  • references to Canadian Regulation A issuers that report under IFRS need to comply with Regulation S-X
  • references to nonexistent disclosure requirements or incorrect references

Share This Insight

Categories

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

June 27, 2024

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published five new Form 8-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) expanding the agency’s interpretations of cybersecurity incident disclosures pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. In July 2023, the SEC adopted final rules with respect to cybersecurity incidents that generally require public companies to disclose (i) material cybersecurity incidents within four business days after determining the incident was material and (ii) material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance on an annual basis. We wrote about the final cybersecurity disclosure rules here.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 12, 2024

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted final rules (available here; also see the fact sheet and press release) representing significant changes to  special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), shell companies and the disclosure of projections. These rules aim to enhance disclosures, protect investors and align the regulatory framework for SPACs with traditional IPOs. The following summarizes the key aspects of these rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

October 4, 2023

On September 20, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule amending the so-called “Names Rule” (found here) that is “designed to modernize and enhance” protections under Rule 35d-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The final rule is part of the SEC’s holistic efforts to regulate environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, and is the SEC’s latest attempt to curb greenwashing in U.S. capital markets. The amendments require registered investment funds that include ESG factors in their names to place 80% of their assets in investments corresponding to those factors, thereby extending to ESG funds the SEC’s long-standing approach of regulating the names of registered funds to ensure they are marketed to investors truthfully. Fund complexes with more than $1 billion in assets will have two years from the final rule’s effective date (60 days after publication in the Federal Register) to comply, while fund complexes with less than $1 billion in assets will be given a compliance period of 30 months.

Chair Gary Gensler said “[t]he Names Rule reflects a basic idea: A fund’s investment portfolio should match a fund’s advertised investment focus. In essence, if a fund’s name suggests an investment focus, the fund in turn needs to invest shareholders’ dollars in a manner consistent with that investment focus. Otherwise, a fund’s portfolio might be inconsistent with what fund investors desired when selecting a fund based upon its name.” The sole dissenting vote against the rule modification, Commissioner Mark Uyeda, said “[w]ith these amendments, the Commission overemphasizes the importance of a fund’s name, as if to suggest that investors and their financial professionals need not look at the prospectus disclosures.” Commissioner Uyeda also expressed concern that fund investors will bear the increased compliance costs associated with the rule change.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 31, 2023

As discussed in our prior publication (found here), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments on December 14, 2022, regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. On May 25, 2023, the SEC issued three new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) relating to the Rule 10b5-1 amendments.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 24, 2023

On May 15, 2023, the Eastern District of California ruled that California Assembly Bill No. 979 (“AB 979”) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. As enacted, California’s Board Diversity Statute, required public companies with headquarters in the state to include a minimum number of directors from “underrepresented communities” or be subject to fines for violating the statute. AB 979 defines a “director from an underrepresented community” as “an individual who self-identifies as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Native, or who self-identifies as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.”

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 9, 2023

Update: On October 31, 2023, the Fifth Circuit granted the US Chamber of Commerce's petition for review of the SEC's share repurchase disclosure rules, holding that the SEC acted arbitrarily and capriciously in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The court directed the SEC to correct the defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 1, 2023, the SEC informed the Fifth Circuit that it was unable to correct the rule's defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 19, 2023, the Fifth Circuit vacated the SEC’s share repurchase disclosure rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

April 12, 2023

We have released our 2023 ESG Survey which includes a collection of reports reflecting on significant ESG themes and trends from 2022, as well as what we believe to be key developments for 2023.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 6, 2023

As companies begin preparing for the 2023 proxy season, we note that Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) and Glass Lewis, the leading providers of corporate governance solutions and proxy advisory services, issued updated benchmark policies (proxy voting guidelines), which can be found here and here, respectively. The updated proxy voting guidelines generally focus on board accountability and oversight considerations and address topics such as climate accountability, board diversity, shareholder rights, corporate governance standards, executive compensation and social issues. What follows is a summary of the proxy voting guidelines published by ISS and Glass Lewis for the 2023 proxy season.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.