Top 10 Topics for Directors in 2015: Strategic Planning Challenges

Dec 22, 2014

Reading Time : 3 min

Rising geopolitical tensions are also contributing to worries about the global economic outlook. Russia’s incursion into Ukraine and the resulting economic sanctions imposed by the West are impacting the Russian and European economies, as well as many U.S. companies doing business there. The ongoing Syrian conflict, increasing Arab-Israeli hostilities and the startling rise of the Islamic State are further destabilizing that area of the globe. Growing apprehension about the spread of Islamic terrorism, as well as fear of the spread of the Ebola virus or the next unknown crisis, are also casting a shadow over the world economic picture.

Uneven economic growth is not limited to the international stage. On the domestic front, the precipitous drop in oil prices is boosting many sectors of the U.S. economy and leaving more money in consumer pocketbooks. At the same time, however, the low prices are causing oil and gas stocks to drop as energy companies consider ways to delay investments, cut costs and reduce capital spending for 2015. The cheaper valuations will also have some companies seeking out synergistic acquisition opportunities, while others will be looking for buyers or other lifelines to save them from this rough patch.

Management and boards also need to assess the divergent impact that the U.S. recovery has had on the American consumer. While the top percentile of American households have seen their wealth return to pre-financial crisis levels, due in large part to the long-running bull market, most Americans have experienced flat wages and many struggle to make ends meet.

Another factor adding to the domestic equation is the Federal Reserve’s shift in fiscal policy. In light of an improving economy and lower unemployment rates, the Federal Reserve has ended its quantitative easing (QE) bond buying program and many predict that the Federal Reserve will raise the federal funds rate, which is currently near zero, by mid-2015. While the rampant inflation and financial bubbles predicted by critics of the Fed’s QE program did not materialize, many economists expect market turbulence as the QE program comes to an end and the Fed moves closer to its first rate hike since 2006.3

In light of the economic uncertainty, U.S. companies have grown their cash stockpiles to a record $1.63 billion as of mid-2014.4 Ultimately, companies will need to make important strategic decisions on whether and when to deploy these funds, particularly as shareholders demand more return on their investment. Since the financial crisis, companies have been creating shareholder value by cutting costs, improving operations and buying back stock. So far this year, more than 80 percent of S&P 500 companies have engaged in stock buybacks, which will likely top $568 billion for the year.5 While stock buybacks create shareholder value, directors need to consider whether choosing to buy back stock in lieu of other investment and growth opportunities is the best use of corporate funds. One of the biggest challenges facing companies is finding ways to drive top-line growth, preferably through organic growth, which is often the toughest to achieve.  Many companies are pursuing growth through acquisitions, taking advantage of ample cash and the ability to borrow money at record low rates. As discussed more fully below, 2014 is on track to be the biggest year for M&A activity since 2007.

In addition to economic and geopolitical uncertainties, management and boards face a host of other challenges as they plot their company’s long-term strategic direction. As discussed in this alert, these challenges include understanding and anticipating the impact that technology will have on the company’s business and understanding and managing the company’s risk, particularly as they relate to cybersecurity.

This post was excerpted from our annual Top 10 Topics for Directors in 2015 alert. To read the full alert, please click here


1 PricewaterhouseCooper’s (PwC) 2014 Annual Corporate Directors Survey, at p. 17.

2 Christopher S. Rugaber, “Economy 101: 5 Things to Know About U.S. Growth,” The Associated Press (Oct. 29, 2014).

3 Matthew Craft, “Did the Stimulus Work?” The Dallas Morning News (Nov. 3, 2014).

4 Richard Leong, “U.S. Companies Spend Cash Stockpile on M&A, Shares: Survey,” Reuters (Oct. 28, 2014).

5 Will Deener, “No Need to Worry About Buybacks,” The Dallas Morning News (Oct. 20, 2014).

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

June 27, 2024

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published five new Form 8-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) expanding the agency’s interpretations of cybersecurity incident disclosures pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. In July 2023, the SEC adopted final rules with respect to cybersecurity incidents that generally require public companies to disclose (i) material cybersecurity incidents within four business days after determining the incident was material and (ii) material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance on an annual basis. We wrote about the final cybersecurity disclosure rules here.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 12, 2024

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted final rules (available here; also see the fact sheet and press release) representing significant changes to  special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), shell companies and the disclosure of projections. These rules aim to enhance disclosures, protect investors and align the regulatory framework for SPACs with traditional IPOs. The following summarizes the key aspects of these rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

October 4, 2023

On September 20, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule amending the so-called “Names Rule” (found here) that is “designed to modernize and enhance” protections under Rule 35d-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The final rule is part of the SEC’s holistic efforts to regulate environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, and is the SEC’s latest attempt to curb greenwashing in U.S. capital markets. The amendments require registered investment funds that include ESG factors in their names to place 80% of their assets in investments corresponding to those factors, thereby extending to ESG funds the SEC’s long-standing approach of regulating the names of registered funds to ensure they are marketed to investors truthfully. Fund complexes with more than $1 billion in assets will have two years from the final rule’s effective date (60 days after publication in the Federal Register) to comply, while fund complexes with less than $1 billion in assets will be given a compliance period of 30 months.

Chair Gary Gensler said “[t]he Names Rule reflects a basic idea: A fund’s investment portfolio should match a fund’s advertised investment focus. In essence, if a fund’s name suggests an investment focus, the fund in turn needs to invest shareholders’ dollars in a manner consistent with that investment focus. Otherwise, a fund’s portfolio might be inconsistent with what fund investors desired when selecting a fund based upon its name.” The sole dissenting vote against the rule modification, Commissioner Mark Uyeda, said “[w]ith these amendments, the Commission overemphasizes the importance of a fund’s name, as if to suggest that investors and their financial professionals need not look at the prospectus disclosures.” Commissioner Uyeda also expressed concern that fund investors will bear the increased compliance costs associated with the rule change.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 31, 2023

As discussed in our prior publication (found here), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments on December 14, 2022, regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. On May 25, 2023, the SEC issued three new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) relating to the Rule 10b5-1 amendments.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 24, 2023

On May 15, 2023, the Eastern District of California ruled that California Assembly Bill No. 979 (“AB 979”) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. As enacted, California’s Board Diversity Statute, required public companies with headquarters in the state to include a minimum number of directors from “underrepresented communities” or be subject to fines for violating the statute. AB 979 defines a “director from an underrepresented community” as “an individual who self-identifies as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Native, or who self-identifies as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.”

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 9, 2023

Update: On October 31, 2023, the Fifth Circuit granted the US Chamber of Commerce's petition for review of the SEC's share repurchase disclosure rules, holding that the SEC acted arbitrarily and capriciously in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The court directed the SEC to correct the defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 1, 2023, the SEC informed the Fifth Circuit that it was unable to correct the rule's defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 19, 2023, the Fifth Circuit vacated the SEC’s share repurchase disclosure rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

April 12, 2023

We have released our 2023 ESG Survey which includes a collection of reports reflecting on significant ESG themes and trends from 2022, as well as what we believe to be key developments for 2023.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 6, 2023

As companies begin preparing for the 2023 proxy season, we note that Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) and Glass Lewis, the leading providers of corporate governance solutions and proxy advisory services, issued updated benchmark policies (proxy voting guidelines), which can be found here and here, respectively. The updated proxy voting guidelines generally focus on board accountability and oversight considerations and address topics such as climate accountability, board diversity, shareholder rights, corporate governance standards, executive compensation and social issues. What follows is a summary of the proxy voting guidelines published by ISS and Glass Lewis for the 2023 proxy season.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.