Intellectual Property > IP Newsflash
01 Apr '16

A district court recently addressed whether Internet investigation by counsel about the venire, including searches of social media, should be allowed.

The court discussed three reasons to restrict, if not forbid, Internet searches about the venire by counsel, their jury consultants, investigators and clients. First, the court discussed the potential danger that jurors, upon learning of counsel’s own searches directed at them, would choose to conduct their own Internet searches about the lawyers or about the case, in violation of the court’s instructions. This danger is even more acute in high-profile lawsuits, like the one at issue here, which create enormous amounts of online commentary, not all of which is accurate. The second potential danger is that Internet searches could facilitate personal appeals to particular jurors based on information gleaned about an individual’s preferences. The court explained that, while jury arguments may employ analogies and quotations, “It would be out of bounds to play up to a juror through such a calculated personal appeal.” The third reason is to protect the privacy of the venire, which, as the court explained, is “not a fantasy team composed by consultants, but good citizens commuting from all over the district, willing to serve our country, and willing to bear the burden of deciding a commercial dispute the parties themselves cannot resolve.”

Read More

16 Mar '16

On March 14, 2016, the Federal Circuit reversed a decision of the United States District Court for the District of Illinois and held that dismissal on forum non conveniens grounds is improper when there is no evidence indicating that the foreign forum will provide an avenue for redress for the subject matter in dispute.

Read More