CFIUS Effectively Blocks German Acquisition of U.S. Technology Company

Mar 7, 2017

Reading Time : 2 min

As background, CFIUS is an interagency committee with the authority to review certain foreign investments in the United States for national security considerations. Specifically, CFIUS has the authority to review “covered transactions” that could result in the transfer of control over a U.S. business to a non-U.S. person. The CFIUS review process involves a 30-day review period and then a more in-depth 45-day investigation if CFIUS identifies potential national security concerns. Following its review and/or investigation, CFIUS may require the parties to adopt mitigation measures as a condition to its approval and may also direct parties to withdraw and refile their notice to allow for more time to address potential national security concerns. If these concerns are not addressed, CFIUS may recommend that the President block a pending transaction or unwind a completed transaction.  

After Cree and Infineon reached an agreement to sell Wolfspeed in July 2016, the parties reportedly submitted a joint notice to CFIUS in November 2016. On February 8, 2017, Cree announced that the transaction in its existing form was unlikely to be approved by CFIUS, and the parties indicated that they were considering mitigation measures, including the potential divestiture of some of the Wolfspeed business.  

Although its deliberations are confidential, CFIUS may have had concerns about Wolfspeed’s silicon carbide (“SiC”) technology, which is used in compound semiconductors. In particular, Wolfspeed has developed Radio Frequency (RF) devices that include Gallium Nitride on Silicon Carbide (“GaN-on-SiC”), which is a technology that has reportedly caused CFIUS to recommend blocking other transactions. Wolfspeed has stated that its RF technology is used in electron mobility transistors and monolithic microwave integrated circuits in both civilian and military markets. In April 2016, Wolfspeed’s GaN-on-SiC RF power transistors successfully completed testing for compliance with NASA reliability standards for satellite and space systems, giving its customers, according to Wolfspeed, “the ability to specify [Wolfspeed’s] GaN RF devices in the most critical aerospace, military, and satellite electronics systems.”

On February 16, 2017, Cree announced that the parties were unable to identify mitigation measures to satisfy CFIUS' concerns. Consequently, the parties decided to terminate the transaction, which reportedly triggered a $12.5 million termination fee that Infineon must pay to Cree.

This transaction highlights CFIUS' focus on deals involving sensitive technology, particularly in the semiconductor sector. Since 2016, CFIUS or the President has effectively blocked a number of other transactions in the semiconductor industry involving Chinese buyers, including Aixtron-Fujian Grand Chip, GCS-San’an and Lumileds-GO Scale. With this latest outcome, CFIUS has indicated that these potential national security concerns are not limited to Chinese buyers and can arise in transactions with companies from closely allied countries.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Trade Law

2023-01-26

At the end of last year, World Trade Organization (WTO) members agreed that the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) of the WTO will take place in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), in February 2024. There is no doubt that the WTO is facing headwinds and is in need of a vigorous push forward. The UAE’s success in transforming itself into a global trade and digital hub and a leader in services trade could serve to drive a successful outcome at MC13.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-17

On December 21, 2022, the appeal arbitrators in the Colombia – Frozen Fries (DS591) World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute circulated their award (the “Award”). This was the second appeal conducted under Article 25 of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) and the first appeal under the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), a framework created by a group of WTO members to overcome the challenges posed by the non-operational Appellate Body.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-02-10

The United Kingdom just issued a new statutory instrument, effective immediately, which extends the authority to designate persons and entities under the U.K. sanctions against Russia.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-06-10

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin Gump’s webinar, “Protecting the Crown Jewels - New U.K. National Security Rules for Foreign Investment in a Post-COVID-19, Post-Brexit World.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-05-07

The clock is ticking down to the entry into force of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) on July 1, 2020.  Leading up to that date, businesses have a unique advocacy opportunity to influence the implementing regulations and associated processes, such as legislative changes to Mexico’s domestic laws. Additionally, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), along with their Mexican and Canadian counterparts, have begun issuing guidance for the trade community seeking to obtain the benefits of the agreement. At this time, these guidance documents include a petition process for automakers to request alternative staging for the automotive rules of origin as well as general interim implementation instructions for USMCA entries. Still to come are regulations regarding the automotive labor value content requirements and Uniform Regulations regarding the customs provisions. Akin Gump and our partners at Dorantes Advisors in Mexico City have jointly developed brief summaries of these guidance documents and a timeline of key actions still to take place prior to entry into force. The materials are available here in both English and Spanish.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-03-02

Last week, in a highly anticipated decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) concluded that Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 does not offend the non-delegation doctrine. To most observers, the ruling does not come as a surprise, but the story on Section 232 and the non-delegation doctrine is not yet over.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.