Ecuador Imposes Safeguard Import Tariffs

Mar 10, 2015

Reading Time : 2 min

Ecuador’s safeguard measure targets imported consumer goods and raw materials, and the additional tariff amount varies by product category. The general categories of products subject to the measure and the amount of duties applicable to each product category are as follows:

Additional Duty Percentage

Products

5

Nonessential capital goods and raw materials

15

Goods with intermediate sensitivity

25

Tires, ceramics, television knockdown kits (CKDs) and motorcycle CKDs

45

Consumer goods, televisions and motorcycles

 

The following products will not be subject to additional duties:

1. raw materials and capital goods
2. personal hygiene and home care products
3. medicines and medical equipment
4. auto parts
5. fuels and lubricants
6. importations made using express courier services
7. personal belongings.

Ecuador has provided a detailed list of products subject to the measure, and we can provide additional information about specific products upon request.

Since falling oil prices have reduced Ecuador’s export revenue, Ecuador is trying to address its balance of payments situation by limiting imports to restrict the outflow of revenue. Ecuador has implemented similar safeguards in the past. Most recently, in January 2015, Ecuador imposed import tariffs on goods from Colombia and Peru, which were lifted in February 2015 after negotiations with both countries.

Ecuador is expected to notify the World Trade Organization (WTO) of its balance of payments measure this week. Although the WTO allows members to adopt import restrictions to safeguard their balance of payments situations, such measures are strictly regulated as to both their justification and the manner in which they are applied. Under the procedures set out in Article XII and Article XVIII:B of GATT 1994 and the Understanding on the Balance-of-Payments Provisions of the GATT 1994 (“Understanding”), Ecuador must enter into consultations with other WTO members, in the context of the Committee on Balance of Payment Restrictions (“Committee”), within four months of adoption of its balance of payments safeguard. The Committee has proven to be an effective mechanism for ensuring that members comply with the disciplines of Article XII, Article XVIII:B and the Understanding.

Ecuador’s consultations with the Committee will focus on the nature of Ecuador’s balance of payments difficulties, the availability of less restrictive corrective measures and the possible effect of the restrictions on the economies of other members. As part of this process, Ecuador will be asked to prepare and submit to the Committee a more detailed document on its balance of payments situation. In addition, the WTO Secretariat will prepare a background report, and a representative of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) will be asked to prepare a statement. At the end of the process, the Committee will issue a report reflecting the discussion and the Committee’s conclusions. In addition to the consultations held within the Committee, balance of payments safeguards may be challenged in WTO dispute settlements.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Trade Law

2023-01-26

At the end of last year, World Trade Organization (WTO) members agreed that the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) of the WTO will take place in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), in February 2024. There is no doubt that the WTO is facing headwinds and is in need of a vigorous push forward. The UAE’s success in transforming itself into a global trade and digital hub and a leader in services trade could serve to drive a successful outcome at MC13.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-17

On December 21, 2022, the appeal arbitrators in the Colombia – Frozen Fries (DS591) World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute circulated their award (the “Award”). This was the second appeal conducted under Article 25 of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) and the first appeal under the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), a framework created by a group of WTO members to overcome the challenges posed by the non-operational Appellate Body.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-02-10

The United Kingdom just issued a new statutory instrument, effective immediately, which extends the authority to designate persons and entities under the U.K. sanctions against Russia.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-06-10

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin Gump’s webinar, “Protecting the Crown Jewels - New U.K. National Security Rules for Foreign Investment in a Post-COVID-19, Post-Brexit World.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-05-07

The clock is ticking down to the entry into force of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) on July 1, 2020.  Leading up to that date, businesses have a unique advocacy opportunity to influence the implementing regulations and associated processes, such as legislative changes to Mexico’s domestic laws. Additionally, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), along with their Mexican and Canadian counterparts, have begun issuing guidance for the trade community seeking to obtain the benefits of the agreement. At this time, these guidance documents include a petition process for automakers to request alternative staging for the automotive rules of origin as well as general interim implementation instructions for USMCA entries. Still to come are regulations regarding the automotive labor value content requirements and Uniform Regulations regarding the customs provisions. Akin Gump and our partners at Dorantes Advisors in Mexico City have jointly developed brief summaries of these guidance documents and a timeline of key actions still to take place prior to entry into force. The materials are available here in both English and Spanish.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-03-02

Last week, in a highly anticipated decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) concluded that Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 does not offend the non-delegation doctrine. To most observers, the ruling does not come as a surprise, but the story on Section 232 and the non-delegation doctrine is not yet over.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.