EU-U.S. Reach New Data Transfer Agreement, Replacing Safe Harbor

Feb 2, 2016

Reading Time : 2 min

By: Davina Garrod, Natasha G. Kohne, Michelle A. Reed, Jo-Ellyn Sakowitz Klein, Stephen S. Kho, Hal S. Shapiro, David S. Turetsky, Visiting Professor, College of Emergency Preparedness, Homeland Security, and Cybersecurity at the University of Albany

The text of the Privacy Shield is not yet publicly available, and negotiators appear to be continuing to give attention to some of the wording. Thus, information on the Privacy Shield is incomplete and is drawn from initial governmental press releases, statements and briefings. As additional information becomes available, we will update with further guidance.       

EU Justice Commissioner Jourova refers to the Privacy Shield as taking a “trust but check” approach. Regular reviews, including annually, are built into the agreement, and there will also be a suspension clause that can be invoked if it fails to operate appropriately. Some reported new and revised provisions, as compared to the prior Safe Harbor regime, include written assurances from the United States that any use of Europeans’ personal data for intelligence purposes will be necessary and proportionate, and a greater variety of avenues by which European citizens might obtain redress of concerns with handling of their data by U.S. intelligence agencies or corporations. Depending on the specific type of claim and circumstances, this could include access through European state representatives to an ombudsman in the U.S. State Department to address whether the safeguards concerning a European citizen were met and, as a last resort, if a company does not resolve a claim by a European citizen about how his or her personal data was handled, free binding arbitration with the possibility of judicial review subject to the Federal Arbitration Act. The U.S. Department of Commerce will monitor that companies publish their commitments, which will then be enforceable by the Federal Trade Commission.  As always, the FTC will have the discretion to bring complaints, and there reportedly is some strengthening of commitments regarding FTC cooperation. 

The new agreement will generally be welcomed by the business community on both sides of the Atlantic, even as they wait to see the details. Supporters are hopeful that it will allow for continued efficient handling of data subject to appropriate privacy protections, which will be important to the economies of Europe and the United States. At the same time, the new agreement will not be welcomed universally, as has been well-understood for some time. Some privacy advocates will be disappointed, and it will be challenged in the EU, as was the Safe Harbor agreement. The negotiators sought to reach an agreement that would withstand such tests. The reaction of the Data Protection Authorities will also be watched, and important developments may come quickly. 

Initial estimates are that the Privacy Shield will take months to be put in place.

*This blog post was originally on AG Deal Diary

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Akin Trade Law

February 9, 2023

Read More

Akin Trade Law

2023-01-26

At the end of last year, World Trade Organization (WTO) members agreed that the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) of the WTO will take place in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), in February 2024. There is no doubt that the WTO is facing headwinds and is in need of a vigorous push forward. The UAE’s success in transforming itself into a global trade and digital hub and a leader in services trade could serve to drive a successful outcome at MC13.

...

Read More

Akin Trade Law

2023-01-17

On December 21, 2022, the appeal arbitrators in the Colombia – Frozen Fries (DS591) World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute circulated their award (the “Award”). This was the second appeal conducted under Article 25 of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) and the first appeal under the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), a framework created by a group of WTO members to overcome the challenges posed by the non-operational Appellate Body.

...

Read More

Akin Trade Law

2022-02-10

The United Kingdom just issued a new statutory instrument, effective immediately, which extends the authority to designate persons and entities under the U.K. sanctions against Russia.

...

Read More

Akin Trade Law

2020-06-10

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin Gump’s webinar, “Protecting the Crown Jewels - New U.K. National Security Rules for Foreign Investment in a Post-COVID-19, Post-Brexit World.

...

Read More

Akin Trade Law

2020-05-07

The clock is ticking down to the entry into force of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) on July 1, 2020.  Leading up to that date, businesses have a unique advocacy opportunity to influence the implementing regulations and associated processes, such as legislative changes to Mexico’s domestic laws. Additionally, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), along with their Mexican and Canadian counterparts, have begun issuing guidance for the trade community seeking to obtain the benefits of the agreement. At this time, these guidance documents include a petition process for automakers to request alternative staging for the automotive rules of origin as well as general interim implementation instructions for USMCA entries. Still to come are regulations regarding the automotive labor value content requirements and Uniform Regulations regarding the customs provisions. Akin Gump and our partners at Dorantes Advisors in Mexico City have jointly developed brief summaries of these guidance documents and a timeline of key actions still to take place prior to entry into force. The materials are available here in both English and Spanish.

...

Read More

Akin Trade Law

2020-03-02

Last week, in a highly anticipated decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) concluded that Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 does not offend the non-delegation doctrine. To most observers, the ruling does not come as a surprise, but the story on Section 232 and the non-delegation doctrine is not yet over.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.