Iran Sanctions Relief Offers Limited Opportunities and Substantial Risks

Jan 28, 2014

Reading Time : 10+ min

Companies considering such new opportunities should understand that transactions permitted by the temporary suspension of international sanctions on Iran still carry substantial risks that should be factored into related legal and business judgments. Despite the easing of sanctions with respect to non-U.S. persons, U.S. sanctions applicable to U.S. persons remain fundamentally unchanged. Transactions conducted pursuant to sanctions relief may not involve U.S. persons or U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entities, with the exception of specified relief related to aviation parts and services, which require a license from the Office of Foreign Asset Controls (OFAC). In addition, prohibitions against the transfers of most U.S.
-origin goods and foreign-made goods incorporating more than a specified level of controlled U.S. -origin content remain in place under U.S. sanctions and export control laws—even if they only involve non-U.S. persons. Transactions may not involve persons or entities listed in OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List, unless otherwise specified. Moreover, the sanctions relief measures do not limit SEC Iran sanctions disclosure requirements and related risks for affected U.S. and non-U.S. companies. In addition, the sanctions relief measures do not negate the state divestment sanctions laws implemented by many U.S. states, which could negatively impact non-U.S. companies with U.S. institutional investors if they engage in transactions made possible by the temporary sanctions relief provisions for Iran.

Background

While the departments of State and the Treasury have not publicly released the text of further details reached with Iran, the departments released guidance describing the mechanics of how the United States will implement the temporary sanctions relief (“U.S. JPOA Implementation Guidance”), and the Department of State published a notice in the Federal Register temporarily waiving parts of certain statutory sanctions (“JPOA Implementation FR Notice”). According to these sources, the U.S. government will not impose sanctions under certain legal authorities, with respect to certain “persons,” and for only transactions. For example, the U.S. government will not impose correspondent or payable-through account sanctions under Section 3(a)(ii) of Executive Order 13645 with respect to foreign financial institutions that provide goods or services used in connection with the automotive sector of Iran.

The U.S. JPOA Implementation Guidance specifies each legal authority (e.g., Executive Order) the U.S. government plans to temporarily suspend, as well as its related transaction. For purposes of this client alert we describe sanctions relief for transactions in three general categories:

  • Financial Sector Sanctions—Sanctions related to the opening, access and maintenance of correspondent or payable-through accounts by foreign financial institutions in the United States
  • Blocking Sanctions—Sanctions related to the blocking of property and interest in property
  • Menu-based Sanctions—Executive Orders 13622 and 13645, among others, describe lists of sanctions the U.S. government may impose in response to certain conduct. For purposes of this client alert, these lists of sanctions are referred to as “Menu-based Sanctions”

Limited, Temporary and Reversible U.S. Sanctions Relief

1. Crude Oil Sales

Under the JPOA, the United States agreed to (i) “[p]ause efforts to further reduce Iran’s crude oil sales, enabling Iran’s current customers to purchase their current average amounts of crude oil,” (ii) “[e]nable the repatriation of an agreed amount of revenue held abroad” and (iii) “[f]or such oil sales, suspend the EU and U.S. sanctions on associated insurance and transportation services.”3

i. Permit Current Level of Crude Oil Sales

The United States announced that, in furtherance of its commitment to “pause efforts to further reduce” crude oil sales from Iran to China, India, Japan, Korea, Taiwan or Turkey (“Current Customers”) it will not impose:

  • certain Financial Sector Sanctions on foreign financial institutions that conduct or facilitate financial transactions by non-U.S. persons for exports of petroleum or petroleum products from Iran to its Current Customers4
  • certain Blocking Sanctions on non-U.S. persons who provide certain assistance (including goods or financial, material or technological support) to or in support of exports of petroleum or petroleum products from Iran to its Current Customers5
  • certain Menu-Based Sanctions on non-U.S. persons who engage in transactions for exports of petroleum or petroleum products from Iran to its Current Customers.6

U.S. guidance specifically authorizes transactions involving the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC), the National Iranian Tanker Company (NITC) or any Iranian depository institutions listed solely pursuant to Executive Order 13599 but notes that they may not involve other persons on the SDN List.7 Additionally, suspension of crude oil sanctions is intended to allow Iran’s Current Customers of crude oil to “maintain their current average level of imports from Iran . . . [Current Customers] may not increase their average quantities of Iranian crude oil imports during that period.”8

ii. Enable the Repatriation of Certain Revenue Held Abroad

The JPOA provides that the United States will release $4.2 billion of Iranian assets held abroad. The United States is working with the P5+1 and relevant foreign financial institutions to make eight installment payments to Iran of between $450 million and $550 million within the JPOA period. OFAC notes that, unless a foreign financial institution is notified directly and in writing by the U.S. government that a release of funds is “not sanctionable,” any release or receipt of funds may result in the application of U.S. sanctions.9 Foreign financial institutions under the primary jurisdiction of Switzerland may be notified directly in writing by the U.S. government, to the extent necessary for such foreign financial institutions to engage in financial transactions with the Central Bank of Iran (CBI) in connection with the repatriation of Iranian assets.

iii. Suspend Transportation and Insurance-Related Sanctions

The United States has also announced that it will not apply Financial Sector Sanctions, Blocking Sanctions or Menu-based Sanctions for insurance or transportation services provided by non-U.S. persons in support of exports of petroleum or petroleum products from Iran to its Current Customers.10

2. Exports of Petrochemicals from Iran

Under the JPOA, the United States agreed to temporarily lift sanctions on “Iran’s petrochemical exports, as well as sanctions on any associated services.”11 The United States defines “petrochemical products” as including any aromatic, olefin and synthetic gas, and any of their derivatives, including ethylene, propylene, butadiene, benzene, toluene, xylene, ammonia, methanol and urea.12

To implement this JPOA commitment, the United States has announced that it will not impose:

  • certain Financial Sector Sanctions on foreign financial institutions that conduct or facilitate transactions by non-U.S. persons for the export of petrochemical products from Iran13
  • certain Blocking Sanctions on non-U.S. persons who provide certain assistance (including goods or financial, material or technological support) to or in support of the petrochemical companies listed in the Annex to the U.S. JPOA Implementation Guidance for export of petrochemical products from Iran14
  • certain Menu-based Sanctions on non-U.S. persons who engage in transactions for the export of petrochemical products from Iran.15

The JPOA Implementation FR Notice notes that Section 1246(a) of the Iran Freedom and Counter Proliferation Act (IFCA) is waived to allow for the provision of underwriting services or insurance or reinsurance for the export from Iran of petrochemical products and associate services. As a limitation, transactions for petrochemical products from Iran cannot involve persons on the SDN List, other than the 14 petrochemical companies listed in the Annex to the U.S. JPOA Implementation Guidance or any Iranian depository institutions listed solely pursuant to Executive Order 13599.

3. Exports to Iran of Automotive Sector and Associated Services

Under the JPOA, the United States agreed to temporarily suspend its sanctions on “Iran’s auto industry, as well as associated sanctions and services.”16 The United States has announced that in furtherance of this commitment, during the JPOA Period it will not impose:

  • certain Financial Sector Sanctions on foreign financial institutions that conduct or facilitate financial transactions for non-U.S. persons for the sale, supply or transfer to Iran of goods or services used in connection with the automotive sector of Iran17
  • certain Menu-based Sanctions on non-U.S. persons who engage in transactions for the sale, supply or automotive sector of Iran.18

The United States has noted that this easing of sanctions affects goods, including complete knock-down kits (CKDs), and services including shipping, warranty, underwriting services, insurance or reinsurance and maintenance services used in connection with the automotive sector.19 However, transactions cannot involve persons on the SDN List, other than any Iranian depository institutions listed solely pursuant to Executive Order 13599.20

4. Sanctions Related to Gold and Precious Metals and Associated Services

Pursuant to the JPOA, the United States agreed to suspend its sanctions on gold and precious metals. This will permit non-U.S. persons to sell, supply or transfer to or from Iran precious metals, including gold. To facilitate this roll-back, the United States will not impose:

  • certain Financial Sector Sanctions on foreign financial institutions that conduct or facilitate transactions by non-U.S. persons for the purchase or acquisition of precious metals to or from Iran21
  • certain Blocking Sanctions on non-U.S. persons who provide certain assistance (including goods or financial, material or technological support) to or in support of the purchase or acquisition of precious metals to or from Iran or by the Government of Iran.22

The JPOA Implementation FR Notice notes that Section 1246(a) of the IFCA is waived to allow for the provision of underwriting services or insurance or reinsurance for sale, supply or transfer to or from Iran of previous metals and associate services that fall within the JPOA. Funds for the purchase of gold and other precious metals may not be drawn from “Restricted Funds” (e.g.,revenues from the sale of Iranian petroleum or petroleum products or funds held by the Central Bank of Iran).23 Additionally, transactions may not involve persons on the SDN List, other than any political subdivision, agency or instrumentality of the Government of Iran listed solely pursuant to Executive Order 13599 or any Iranian depository institutions listed solely pursuant to Executive Order 13599.24

5. Exports of Commercial Aviation Spare Parts and Associated Services

Under the JPOA, the United States agreed to (i) “[l]icense the supply and installation in Iran of spare parts for safety of flight for Iranian civil aviation and associated services, and (ii) [l]icense safety related inspections and repairs in Iran as well as associated services.”25

In furtherance of this commitment, OFAC released a Statement of Licensing Policy (SLP) under which U.S. persons, U.S.-owned or -controlled foreign entities and non-U.S. persons can request specific authorization from OFAC to engage in transactions to ensure the safe operation of Iranian commercial passenger aircraft.26 Licensable activities include, but are not limited to, the export and reexport of (i) services related to the inspection of commercial aircraft and parts in Iran or a third country, (ii) services related to the repair or servicing of commercial aircraft in Iran or a third country and (iii) goods or technology, including spare parts, to Iran or a third country.27 Licensable transactions may involve Iran Air, but may not involve other Iranian airlines listed on OFAC’s SDN List.28

In addition to the SLP, the United States has announced it also will not impose:

  • certain Financial Sector Sanctions on foreign financial institutions that conduct or facilitate financial transactions covered by the SLP that are conducted on behalf of non-U.S. persons29
  • certain Blocking Sanctions on persons who provide certain assistance (including goods or financial, material or technological support) to, or in support of, Iran Air in connection with activities intended to ensure the safe operation of Iranian commercial passenger aircraft.30
  • The JPOA Implementation FR Notice notes that Section 1246(a) of the IFCA is waived to allow for the provision of underwriting services or insurance or reinsurance for the supply and installation of spare parts necessary for the safety of flight for Iranian civil aviation, for safety-related inspections and repairs in Iran and for associated services, provided that OFAC has issued any required license.

6. Humanitarian and Tuition Assistance

i. Current Law

Under U.S. government sanctions, the “sale and export of nearly all types of food and medicine to Iran are broadly authorized, and require no specific license or special authorization from . . .[OFAC] or any other agency of the U.S. government.”31

“The sale and export of basic medical supplies are likewise broadly authorized. Other types of humanitarian exports may be authorized pursuant to a specific license from OFAC. In such instances, where U.S. persons are either specifically or generally authorized to engage in humanitarian exports to Iran, financial institutions here and abroad are generally permitted under U.S. law to process all financial transactions necessary to facilitate the trade.”32

ii. Implementation of JPOA

Under the JPOA, the P5+1 committed to establishing a “financial channel to facilitate humanitarian trade for Iran’s domestic needs using Iranian oil revenues held abroad.” The establishment of this channel is intended to further facilitate existing “humanitarian trade”—transactions involving food and agricultural products, medicine, medical devices and medical expenses incurred abroad— with Iran using the oil revenue held abroad. Additionally, the channel is meant to enable transactions required to pay Iran’s UN obligations and to direct tuition payments for Iranian students studying abroad.33

The P5+1 are working with foreign financial institutions to establish the “financial channel” and will be contacted directly by the Department of the Treasury and provided with specific guidance.34 Foreign financial institutions under the primary jurisdiction of Switzerland may be notified directly in writing by the U.S. government, to the extent necessary for such foreign financial institutions to engage in financial transactions with the CBI in connection with the establishment of the financial channel.

Risk Considerations for Potential New Business with Iran

Companies that plan to test the waters with Iran between January 20, 2014 and July 20, 2014 should proceed with caution for several reasons.

  • First, sanctions relief is available only during the JPOA Period. If contracts, sales or payment extended beyond July 20, 2014, the activities may be sanctionable.35
  • Second, with the exception of relief related to aviation parts and services, relief involves only non-U.S. persons. U.S. persons and U.S.-owned or
    -controlled foreign entities continue to be barred from engaging in substantially all activities with Iran.
  • Third, all sanctions related to SDNs and other designated persons remain in place unless otherwise specified. Therefore, transactions with designated entities, such as Tidewater Middle East Co., remain sanctionable.36
  • Fourth, the U.S. government has pledged to engage in “rigorous monitoring” to prevent abuse of the sanctions relief under the JPOA37 and to “vigorously enforce” all other existing sanctions against Iran (i.e., those that will not be suspended).
  • Fifth, despite the specified sanctions easing discussed herein, most transactions involving the transfer of U.S.-origin goods or foreign-made goods incorporating more than a specified level of controlled U.S.-origin goods continue to be prohibited under U.S. sanctions and export control laws—even if they only involve non-U.S. persons.
  • Sixth, the sanctions relief may be revoked by the U.S. government at any time during the JPOA Period if Iran fails to meet its commitments under the JPOA. In that event, it is unclear what type of wind-down exemptions (in terms of duration and permitted counterparties) the U.S. government will allow.
  • Seventh, the suspension of sanctions does not eliminate or alter the obligation for companies to disclose activities to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pursuant to Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (TRA).
  • Eighth, U.S. state divestment sanctions remain unchanged, providing a potential basis for compulsory divestment by public institutional investors of direct or indirect investments they have in non-U.S. companies that engage in business that is otherwise allowed under the sanctions relief.
  • Finally, U.S. companies with owned or controlled foreign affiliates in affected industries should be mindful of the disjunction between U.S. and EU easing of sanctions. U.S. companies may be subject to OFAC penalties for activities of a foreign-owned or -controlled affiliate that are not licensed by OFAC.

What Is Next?

The P5+1 and Iran plan to spend the JPOA Period pursuing a comprehensive solution that would provide “verifiable assurances to the international community that Iran’s nuclear activities will be exclusively peaceful and ensure that any attempt by Iran to pursue a nuclear weapon would be promptly detected.”38 If at any time during the JPOA period Iran fails to meet its obligations, the United States, with the consent of the other P5+1 countries, could reverse the suspension of sanctions.

When the JPOA Period expires, the P5+1 and Iran can, by mutual consent, agree to renew the first-step agreement. With the P5+1 and Iran aiming to negotiate and implement a comprehensive solution by November 24, 2014, the United States will need to decide whether to continue the suspension of sanctions between July 20, 2014 and November 24, 2014. Prospects for extension or further easing of sanctions on Iran are dependent on the progress of negotiations with Iran. At this time, such progress remains uncertain. Recently, Iranian officials have publicly stated that U.S. and EU officials have mischaracterized Iran’s commitments and that Iran has not agreed to dismantle or discontinue any aspect of its nuclear program.

Further complicating matters are the actions of the U.S. Congress. Despite commitments in the JPOA to pause additional sanctions, many members of the U.S. Congress question the recent accord with Iran and have proposed new Iran sanctions legislation. The proposed legislation with the most support at this time is the Nuclear Weapon Free Iran Act of 2013, which is supported by 59 senators.39 If enacted, this legislation would impose greater domestic and extraterritorial sanctions on Iran if negotiations were to break down. However, Iran may view the preemptive passage of new sanctions legislation as a violation of the JPOA commitment and walk away from negotiations. 


1 See Department of State Federal Register Notice Provision of Certain Temporary and Limited Sanctions Relief in Order to Implement the Joint Plan of Action of November 24, 2013 Between the P5+1 and the Islamic Republic of Iran, (“JPOA Implementation FR Notice”) 79 FR 4522, dated Jan. 28, 2014, available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-01-28/pdf/2014-01580.pdf.

2 U.S. Department of State and U.S. Department of the Treasury, Guidance Relating to the Provision of Certain Temporary Sanctions Relief in Order to Implement the Joint Plan of Action Reached on November 24, 2013, Between the P5+1 and the Islamic Republic of Iran (“U.S. JPOA Implementation Guidance”), available at http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/Documents/jpoa_guidance.pdf.

3 Joint Plan of Action (JPOA), Nov, 24, 2013, at page 3.

4 See U.S. JPOA Implementation Guidance at pages 5-6. The U.S. government will not impose correspondent or payable-through account sanctions under Section 1(a)(iii) of Executive Order (E.O.) 13622 (as amended by Section 16(b) of E.O. 13645); Section 3(a)(i) of E.O. 13645; and Sections 561.204(a) and 561.204(b)(3) of the Iranian Financial Sanctions Regulations.

5 Id. The U.S. government will not impose blocking sanctions under Section 1(a)(iii) of E.O. 13382; Section 5(a) of E.O. 13622; Sections 2(a)(i)-(ii) of E.O. 13645; and Section 544.201(a)(3) of the Weapons of the Mass Destruction Proliferators Sanctions Regulations.

6 Id. The U.S. government will not impose sanctions under Section 2(a)(ii) of E.O. 13622 (as amended by section 16(d) of E.O. 13645).

7 Id.

8 OFAC, Frequently Asked Questions Relating to the Temporary Sanctions Relief to Implement the Joint Plan of action between the P5+1 and the Islamic Republic of Iran (“OFAC JPOA FAQ”), Jan. 20, 2014, at question 11, available at http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/Documents/jpoa_faqs.pdf.

9 OFAC JPOA FAQ, at question 8. See also Written Testimony of Department of Treasury Under Secretary David S. Cohen Before the United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, “Assessing the P5+1 Joint Plan of Action with Iran: Administration Perspectives,” December 12, 2013, available at http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/texttrans/2013/12/
20131212288869.html#axzz2rFrrtoAR
.

10 See U.S. JPOA Implementation Guidance, at pages 5-6.

11 Id, at page 2.

12 See OFAC JPOA FAQ, at question 4.

13 See U.S. JPOA Implementation Guidance, at page 2. The U.S. government will not impose sanctions under Section 1(a)(iii) of E.O. 13622 (as amended by Section 16(b) of E.O. 13645); Section 3(a)(i) of E.O. 13645; and Sections 561.204(a) and 561.204(b)(3) of the Iranian Financial Sanctions Regulations.

14 Id., at page 2. The U.S. government will not impose blocking sanctions under Section 2(a)(i)-(ii) of E.O. 13645.

15 Id. The U.S. government will not impose sanctions under Section 2(a)(ii) of E.O. 13622 (as amended by Section 16(d) of E.O. 13645).

16 Id, at page 3.

17 Id. The U.S. government will not impose correspondent or payable-through account sanctions under Section 3(a)(ii) of E.O. 13645.

18 Id. The U.S. government will not impose sanctions described in Section 6 of E.O. 13645.

19 OFAC JPOA FAQ, at question 7.

20 See U.S. JPOA Implementation Guidance, at page 3.

21 See U.S. JPOA Implementation Guidance, at page 4.

22 Id. The United States will not impose sanctions under Section 5(a) of E.O. 13622; Sections 2(a)(i)-(ii) of E.O. 13645; and Section 560.211(c)(2) of the Iran Transactions and Sanctions Regulations.

23 Id. “Restricted Funds” refers to (i) any existing and future revenues from the sale of Iranian petroleum or petroleum products, wherever they may be held and (ii) any Central Bank of Iran (CBI) funds, with certain exceptions for nonpetroleum CBI funds held at a foreign country’s central bank.

24 Id.

25 JPOA, at page 3.

26 See OFAC, Statement of Licensing Policy on Activities Related to the Safety of Iran’s Civil Aviation Industry (“OFAC Licensing Policy”), Jan. 20, 2014, available at http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/Documents/civil_aviation_slp_iran.pdf.

27 Id.

28 Id.

29 See U.S. JPOA Implementation Guidance, at page 5. The United States will not impose sanctions under Section 3(a)(i) of E.O. 13645 and Section 561.201(a)(5)(ii) of the Iranian Financial Sanctions Regulations.

30 Id. The United States will not impose sanctions under Section 1(a)(iii) of E.O. 13382, Sections 2(a)(i)-(ii) of E.O. 13645, and Section 544.201(a)(3) of the Weapons of the Mass Destruction Proliferators Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 544.

31 OFAC, Clarifying Guidance: Humanitarian Assistance and Related Exports to the Iranian People, at page 2, available at http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/Documents/hum_exp_iran.pdf.

32 Id.

33 Id.

34 See U.S. JPOA Implementation Guidance, at page 7.

35 OFAC JPOA FAQ, at question 12.

36 Id., at question 15.

37 See Written Statement, Wendy R. Sherman, Under Secretary for Political Affairs, U.S. Department of State Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs “Assessing the P5+1 Joint Plan of Action with Iran” December 12, 2013, at http://www.banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=aec68335-46d4-42b8-ae6b-4054f6bdd498.

38 Fact Sheet: First Step Understandings Regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Nuclear Program, available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/11/23/fact-sheet-first-step-understandings-regarding-islamic-republic-iran-s-n.

39 See Nuclear Weapon Free Iran Act of 2013, available at https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/s1881/text.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Trade Law

2023-01-26

At the end of last year, World Trade Organization (WTO) members agreed that the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) of the WTO will take place in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), in February 2024. There is no doubt that the WTO is facing headwinds and is in need of a vigorous push forward. The UAE’s success in transforming itself into a global trade and digital hub and a leader in services trade could serve to drive a successful outcome at MC13.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-17

On December 21, 2022, the appeal arbitrators in the Colombia – Frozen Fries (DS591) World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute circulated their award (the “Award”). This was the second appeal conducted under Article 25 of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) and the first appeal under the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), a framework created by a group of WTO members to overcome the challenges posed by the non-operational Appellate Body.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-02-10

The United Kingdom just issued a new statutory instrument, effective immediately, which extends the authority to designate persons and entities under the U.K. sanctions against Russia.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-06-10

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin Gump’s webinar, “Protecting the Crown Jewels - New U.K. National Security Rules for Foreign Investment in a Post-COVID-19, Post-Brexit World.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-05-07

The clock is ticking down to the entry into force of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) on July 1, 2020.  Leading up to that date, businesses have a unique advocacy opportunity to influence the implementing regulations and associated processes, such as legislative changes to Mexico’s domestic laws. Additionally, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), along with their Mexican and Canadian counterparts, have begun issuing guidance for the trade community seeking to obtain the benefits of the agreement. At this time, these guidance documents include a petition process for automakers to request alternative staging for the automotive rules of origin as well as general interim implementation instructions for USMCA entries. Still to come are regulations regarding the automotive labor value content requirements and Uniform Regulations regarding the customs provisions. Akin Gump and our partners at Dorantes Advisors in Mexico City have jointly developed brief summaries of these guidance documents and a timeline of key actions still to take place prior to entry into force. The materials are available here in both English and Spanish.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-03-02

Last week, in a highly anticipated decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) concluded that Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 does not offend the non-delegation doctrine. To most observers, the ruling does not come as a surprise, but the story on Section 232 and the non-delegation doctrine is not yet over.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.