New Item for Diligence Review Process: OFAC’s Foreign Sanctions Evaders List

Mar 19, 2014

Reading Time : 2 min

The following is a basic overview of the FSE List and important points to understand in incorporating the FSE List into regular diligence practices.

  • Who is on the FSE List? OFAC will add individuals or entities to the FSE List when the U.S. government determines that they: (1) have violated, attempted to violate, conspired to violate or caused a violation of U.S. sanctions against Syria or Iran; (2) have facilitated deceptive transactions for or on behalf of persons subject to U.S. sanctions against Syria or Iran; and/or (3) are owned or controlled by, or acting or purporting to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, such entities or persons.
  • What is prohibited? Broad sanctions prohibitions preclude U.S. persons from engaging in activities involving parties included on the FSE List. General prohibitions bar U.S. persons from providing or procuring goods or services, including financial services, or technology to or from a listed person without specific prior authorization from OFAC, unless the transaction is otherwise exempt from regulation. Although an FSE’s property is not “blocked” as a matter of law under this OFAC regime (except where such parties are also listed as Specially Designated Nationals or otherwise subject to blocking under other OFAC sanctions programs), OFAC advises that U.S. persons must obtain OFAC authorization to provide, procure or receive property, or services related to that property, to or from an FSE. See also the OFAC FAQs: Question Index. U.S. financial institutions are required to obtain OFAC authorization before allowing the operation of a listed person’s bank account and before allowing the receipt or provision of related wire transfers to such accounts.
  • What are the implications for U.S. Entities? As with other OFAC restricted-party lists, U.S. persons and their subsidiaries or controlled entities outside the United States are effectively prohibited from engaging in “transactions” or activities with FSEs on a strict liability basis. U.S. parties that engage in transactions with an FSE are subject to potential OFAC enforcement and penalties under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
  • What does this mean for you? U.S. entities and individuals must take actions necessary to ensure that they screen effectively against, and do not engage in activities involving, parties included on the FSE List. In particular, the following steps should be incorporated into regular diligence practices to ensure compliance:
    • Use of Vendors for Screening. It is important for entities relying on third-party vendor screening services to check with their providers to ensure that the FSE List is incorporated into automated screening procedures for restricted-party screening. Entities should run test screenings against parties included in the FSE List to verify and document confirmation that their screening safeguards cover this list effectively.
    • Manual Screening. Entities and persons relying on manual screening, including those that use the Consolidated Screening List at www.export.gov, should separately consult the FSE List on OFAC’s website as part of going-forward practices, as long as the FSE List is not incorporated into the Consolidated Screening List.
    • Screening Previously Initiated Transactions. OFAC guidance on the FSE List clearly indicates that there is no “grandfathering” allowance for transactions initiated prior to the listing of an FSE. Where a potential transaction is in process at the time of a listing, U.S. persons are required to terminate and/or cease dealings with the FSE-listed party immediately unless and until otherwise exempted or specifically licensed by OFAC. Accordingly, you may need to review activities screened and initiated prior to February 6, 2014, that have not yet been completed to the extent that FSEs might be involved.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Trade Law

2023-01-26

At the end of last year, World Trade Organization (WTO) members agreed that the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) of the WTO will take place in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), in February 2024. There is no doubt that the WTO is facing headwinds and is in need of a vigorous push forward. The UAE’s success in transforming itself into a global trade and digital hub and a leader in services trade could serve to drive a successful outcome at MC13.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-17

On December 21, 2022, the appeal arbitrators in the Colombia – Frozen Fries (DS591) World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute circulated their award (the “Award”). This was the second appeal conducted under Article 25 of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) and the first appeal under the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), a framework created by a group of WTO members to overcome the challenges posed by the non-operational Appellate Body.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-02-10

The United Kingdom just issued a new statutory instrument, effective immediately, which extends the authority to designate persons and entities under the U.K. sanctions against Russia.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-06-10

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin Gump’s webinar, “Protecting the Crown Jewels - New U.K. National Security Rules for Foreign Investment in a Post-COVID-19, Post-Brexit World.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-05-07

The clock is ticking down to the entry into force of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) on July 1, 2020.  Leading up to that date, businesses have a unique advocacy opportunity to influence the implementing regulations and associated processes, such as legislative changes to Mexico’s domestic laws. Additionally, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), along with their Mexican and Canadian counterparts, have begun issuing guidance for the trade community seeking to obtain the benefits of the agreement. At this time, these guidance documents include a petition process for automakers to request alternative staging for the automotive rules of origin as well as general interim implementation instructions for USMCA entries. Still to come are regulations regarding the automotive labor value content requirements and Uniform Regulations regarding the customs provisions. Akin Gump and our partners at Dorantes Advisors in Mexico City have jointly developed brief summaries of these guidance documents and a timeline of key actions still to take place prior to entry into force. The materials are available here in both English and Spanish.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-03-02

Last week, in a highly anticipated decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) concluded that Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 does not offend the non-delegation doctrine. To most observers, the ruling does not come as a surprise, but the story on Section 232 and the non-delegation doctrine is not yet over.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.