One More List: OFAC’s Foreign Sanctions Evaders List

Feb 25, 2014

Reading Time : 3 min

Who is on the FSE List?

The FSE list implements presidential Executive Order 13608, “Prohibiting Certain Transactions With and Suspending Entry Into the United States of Foreign Sanctions Evaders With Respect to Iran and Syria.”  Pursuant to the Executive Order, the list identifies parties that the U.S. government has determined:

(1) have violated, attempted to violate, conspired to violate or caused a violation of U.S. sanctions against Syria or Iran, including sanctions imposed under counter-proliferation or counter-terrorism authorities;

(2) have facilitated deceptive transactions for or on behalf of persons subject to U.S. sanctions against Syria or Iran; and/or

(3) are owned or controlled by, or acting or purporting to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, such entities or persons.

Under the Executive Order, and for purposes of the FSE list, facilitating a “deceptive transaction” includes withholding or obscuring from other parties and/or regulators the involvement and identity of any person subject to U.S. sanctions against Iran or Syria.

What is Prohibited?

Broad sanctions prohibitions preclude U.S. persons from engaging in activities involving parties included on the FSE list.  General prohibitions bar U.S. persons from providing or procuring goods or services, including financial services, or technology to or from a listed person without specific prior authorization from OFAC, unless the transaction is otherwise exempt from regulation under the IEEPA statute. Although an FSE’s property is not “blocked” as a matter of law under this OFAC regime (except where such parties are also listed as SDNs or otherwise subject to blocking under other OFAC sanctions programs), OFAC advises that U.S. persons must obtain OFAC authorization to provide, procure or receive property, or services related to that property, to or from an FSE (see http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/faqs/Sanctions/Pages/ques_index.aspx#fse).  U.S. financial institutions are required to obtain OFAC authorization before allowing the operation of a listed person’s bank account, and before allowing the receipt or provision of related wire transfers to such accounts.  These restrictions are not limited to transactions involving Iran or Syria.  Rather, once on the FSE list, these provisions bar U.S. persons from engaging in activity of almost any kind involving an FSE, even if it is entirely unrelated to Syria or Iran.

What are the Implications for U.S. Companies and Persons?

As with other OFAC restricted-party lists, U.S. persons and their subsidiaries or controlled entities outside the United States are effectively prohibited from engaging in “transactions” or activities with FSEs on a strict liability basis.  U.S. parties that engage in transactions with an FSE are subject to potential OFAC enforcement and penalties under the IEEPA statute.

What Does This Mean for You?

U.S. companies and persons must take actions necessary to ensure that they screen effectively against, and do not engage in activities involving, parties included on the FSE list.  Moreover, companies may need to review activities screened and initiated prior to February 6, 2014 that have not yet been completed to the extent that FSEs might be involved.  OFAC guidance on the FSE list clearly indicates that there is no “grandfathering” allowance for transactions initiated prior to the listing of an FSE.  Where a potential transaction is in process at the time of a listing, U.S. persons are required to terminate and/or cease dealings with the FSE-listed party immediately unless and until otherwise exempted or specifically licensed by OFAC.  In practical terms, it is important for companies relying on third-party vendor screening services to check with their providers to ensure that the FSE list is incorporated into automated screening procedures for restricted-party screening.  Companies should run test screenings against parties included in the FSE list to verify and document confirmation that their screening safeguards cover this list effectively.  Companies and persons relying on manual screening by use of the Consolidated Screening List at www.export.gov should, in addition, consult the FSE list on OFAC’s website as part of going-forward practices, as long as the FSE list is not incorporated into the Consolidated Screening List.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Trade Law

2023-01-26

At the end of last year, World Trade Organization (WTO) members agreed that the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) of the WTO will take place in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), in February 2024. There is no doubt that the WTO is facing headwinds and is in need of a vigorous push forward. The UAE’s success in transforming itself into a global trade and digital hub and a leader in services trade could serve to drive a successful outcome at MC13.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-17

On December 21, 2022, the appeal arbitrators in the Colombia – Frozen Fries (DS591) World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute circulated their award (the “Award”). This was the second appeal conducted under Article 25 of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) and the first appeal under the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), a framework created by a group of WTO members to overcome the challenges posed by the non-operational Appellate Body.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-02-10

The United Kingdom just issued a new statutory instrument, effective immediately, which extends the authority to designate persons and entities under the U.K. sanctions against Russia.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-06-10

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin Gump’s webinar, “Protecting the Crown Jewels - New U.K. National Security Rules for Foreign Investment in a Post-COVID-19, Post-Brexit World.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-05-07

The clock is ticking down to the entry into force of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) on July 1, 2020.  Leading up to that date, businesses have a unique advocacy opportunity to influence the implementing regulations and associated processes, such as legislative changes to Mexico’s domestic laws. Additionally, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), along with their Mexican and Canadian counterparts, have begun issuing guidance for the trade community seeking to obtain the benefits of the agreement. At this time, these guidance documents include a petition process for automakers to request alternative staging for the automotive rules of origin as well as general interim implementation instructions for USMCA entries. Still to come are regulations regarding the automotive labor value content requirements and Uniform Regulations regarding the customs provisions. Akin Gump and our partners at Dorantes Advisors in Mexico City have jointly developed brief summaries of these guidance documents and a timeline of key actions still to take place prior to entry into force. The materials are available here in both English and Spanish.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-03-02

Last week, in a highly anticipated decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) concluded that Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 does not offend the non-delegation doctrine. To most observers, the ruling does not come as a surprise, but the story on Section 232 and the non-delegation doctrine is not yet over.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.