President Obama Announces Relaxation of Sanctions on Cuba

Dec 19, 2014

Reading Time : 5 min

What Changes Did the President Announce?

According to the White House Fact Sheet dated December 17, 2014, the United States plans to make the following regulatory and policy changes to the Cuba sanctions program:

  • Expansion of Telecommunication Services and Other Commercial Sales from the United States of Certain Goods and Services. The relaxed regulations will allow U.S. companies to sell certain consumer communications devices, related software, applications, hardware, and services, and items for the establishment and update of communications-related systems in Cuba. Telecommunications providers will be allowed to establish the necessary mechanisms, including infrastructure, in Cuba to provide commercial telecommunications and internet services. 

    The regulations will also authorize certain items for export, including certain building materials for private residential construction, goods for use by private sector Cuban entrepreneurs, and agricultural equipment for small farmers.
  • Updating the Application of Cuba Sanctions in Third Countries. Among other measures, the revised regulations will also provide general licenses for U.S.-owned or -controlled entities in third countries to:
    • provide services to, and engage in financial transactions with, Cuban individuals in third countries
    • unblock the U.S. bank accounts of Cuban nationals who have relocated outside of Cuba
    • permit U.S. persons to participate in third-country professional meetings and conferences related to Cuba
    • allow foreign vessels to enter the United States after engaging in certain humanitarian trade with Cuba.
  • Facilitating Authorized Financial Transactions between the United States and Cuba.The changes are also intended to simplify financial transactions by (i) allowing U.S. institutions to open correspondent accounts at Cuban financial institutions to facilitate the processing of authorized transactions; (ii) re-defining the statutory term “cash in advance” to mean “cash before transfer of title”; and (iii) allowing travelers to Cuba to use U.S. credit and debit cards in Cuba.
  • Expanded Travel and Remittance Policies. The changes will facilitate an expansion of travel to Cuba by providing general licenses for the 12 existing categories of authorized travel to Cuba. Additionally, the changes will facilitate remittances to Cuba by U.S. persons and licensed U.S. travelers will be authorized to import up to $400 worth of total goods from Cuba, including up to $100 worth of cigars, tobacco or alcohol.
  • Establishing Diplomatic Relations with Cuba. As mentioned above, the U.S. Department of State will initiate discussions to re-establish diplomatic relations with Cuba, which were severed in January 1961. The U.S. will also initiate a review of Cuba’s designation as a State Sponsor of Terrorism.

When Will the Changes Take Effect?

The majority of these expected changes will take effect when the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the U.S. Department of the Treasury issues revised regulations. OFAC has stated that it will implement Treasury-specific changes via amendments to the Cuba Assets Control Regulations, and that it expects to issue its regulatory amendments in the coming weeks.

The Department of Commerce must implement the remainder of the regulatory changes announced by President Obama through amendments to its Export Administration Regulations (EAR). The timing for implementation of these regulatory changes is currently unclear.

Until regulations implementing modifications to U.S. sanctions and export controls are issued by OFAC and the Department of Commerce, current U.S. legal restrictions on Cuba-related activities remain fully in force. OFAC was quick to issue cautionary guidance underscoring this point following the President’s announcement.

Does This Mean the Embargo is Lifted?

No. Much of the Cuban sanctions program is codified in statutory law, which requires congressional action to amend or repeal unless the statute includes a provision for automatic termination. For example, pursuant to Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (“LIBERTAD”) Act of 1996 (“Helms-Burton Act”), the embargo may be terminated in the event of certain political changes in Cuba (i.e., a transition to a democratically elected Cuban government).

The relevant legislation includes:

  • Helms-Burton Act
  • Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA)
  • Cuban Democracy Act of 1992 (CDA)
  • The Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 (TSRA)
  • Food Security Act of 1985
  • Omnibus Appropriations Act of 1999.

The administration’s discretion and ability to implement easing of the current U.S. sanctions framework for Cuba will be limited to a significant degree by these statutory authorities until congressional action provides a basis to move forward further.

What Happens Next?

OFAC and the Department of Commerce must amend their regulations to implement the President’s changes, and the Department of State will begin working with the Cuban government to re-establish diplomatic relations. Absent major political changes in Cuba, the embargo cannot be completely suspended unless Congress acts to repeal or amend the various embargo-related statutes that codify the U.S. sanctions framework.

As noted, the U.S. Congress will need to play a direct supporting role in order for a more substantial lifting of the U.S. embargo to occur. Consequently, it is important to note that the President’s announcement drew mixed reactions across the political spectrum this week, including support from certain prominent Republican members of Congress, but also strong condemnation from other leading Republicans and at least one top Senate Democrat. With a stronger and more conservative Republican majority expected in the next session of Congress convening in January, it remains to be seen to what extent the White House may be able to move further ahead with larger-scale changes to the Cuba sanctions regime in the remaining two years that the Obama Administration is in office. This may depend to a great extent on the way in which key constituencies and the U.S. business community weigh in and take a position in this foreign policy debate on Cuba in the months ahead.

In addition, it remains to be seen how Cuba moves forward and reacts to the developments in the United States and in bilateral relations over time. While the current mood and tone in Havana is very positive, it is foreseeable that frustration with the pace of U.S. action to ease sanctions could lead to some bumps in the road for the dialog between Washington and Havana that unfolds in the months ahead. Moreover, Cuban law currently imposes restrictions on potential expansion of U.S. commercial relations that will need to be addressed to facilitate meaningful opening of trade relations and economic ties. At this point, it is unclear whether and how Cuba may modify these limitations in conjunction with progress towards normalization of relations with the United States.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Trade Law

2023-01-26

At the end of last year, World Trade Organization (WTO) members agreed that the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) of the WTO will take place in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), in February 2024. There is no doubt that the WTO is facing headwinds and is in need of a vigorous push forward. The UAE’s success in transforming itself into a global trade and digital hub and a leader in services trade could serve to drive a successful outcome at MC13.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-17

On December 21, 2022, the appeal arbitrators in the Colombia – Frozen Fries (DS591) World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute circulated their award (the “Award”). This was the second appeal conducted under Article 25 of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) and the first appeal under the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), a framework created by a group of WTO members to overcome the challenges posed by the non-operational Appellate Body.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-02-10

The United Kingdom just issued a new statutory instrument, effective immediately, which extends the authority to designate persons and entities under the U.K. sanctions against Russia.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-06-10

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin Gump’s webinar, “Protecting the Crown Jewels - New U.K. National Security Rules for Foreign Investment in a Post-COVID-19, Post-Brexit World.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-05-07

The clock is ticking down to the entry into force of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) on July 1, 2020.  Leading up to that date, businesses have a unique advocacy opportunity to influence the implementing regulations and associated processes, such as legislative changes to Mexico’s domestic laws. Additionally, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), along with their Mexican and Canadian counterparts, have begun issuing guidance for the trade community seeking to obtain the benefits of the agreement. At this time, these guidance documents include a petition process for automakers to request alternative staging for the automotive rules of origin as well as general interim implementation instructions for USMCA entries. Still to come are regulations regarding the automotive labor value content requirements and Uniform Regulations regarding the customs provisions. Akin Gump and our partners at Dorantes Advisors in Mexico City have jointly developed brief summaries of these guidance documents and a timeline of key actions still to take place prior to entry into force. The materials are available here in both English and Spanish.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-03-02

Last week, in a highly anticipated decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) concluded that Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 does not offend the non-delegation doctrine. To most observers, the ruling does not come as a surprise, but the story on Section 232 and the non-delegation doctrine is not yet over.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.