U.S. Customs and Border Protection Expands Scope of Counterfeit Information to Which Trademark Owners Are Entitled

Sep 21, 2015

Reading Time : 2 min

Under the interim and final rules, U.S. trademark owners may receive more information from CBP about suspected counterfeit merchandise. CBP historically interpreted the Trade Secrets Act (18 U.S.C. § 1905) as applying to markings, alphanumeric symbols and other coding appearing on imported products, because such marks may reveal information about an importer’s supply chain. Prior to the implementation of the interim rule in 2012, CBP’s written policy was to provide only limited importation information or redacted samples to trademark owners in order to determine whether merchandise bears a counterfeit mark. This limited information (date of importation, port of entry, description, quantity and country of origin of the goods) was usually insufficient for trademark owners to determine whether suspect merchandise was counterfeit.

Now, the interim and final rules authorize CBP to disclose to trademark owners the following information prior to seizure: serial numbers, dates of manufacture, lot codes, batch numbers, universal product codes or other identifying marks appearing on the merchandise or its retail packaging, including labels. This information may include the manufacturer, shipper, exporter or importer name and address. CBP can release this information to trademark owners after an importer has had the opportunity to prove the merchandise is genuine within seven days after a detention notice is issued.

Prior to the expiration of the seven day period, right owners can still receive limited importation information, which includes the date of importation, port of entry, and description, quantity, and country of origin of the goods. In response to commenters’ suggestions, and to avoid unnecessary delay, CBP changed the interim rule’s requirement that CBP provide limited importation information to a trademark owner within 30 business days of detention of suspected counterfeit merchandise. Instead, if available, CBP will provide this information to the right owner concurrently with the detention notice issued to the importer.

The final rule also adds a provision that allows CBP to provide the importer with unredacted information, pictures or a sample of the suspect merchandise prior to the disclosure of information to the trademark owner. This change was in response to commenters’ concern that importers do not always have complete information about the marks appearing on imported goods and retail packaging and that samples or images will assist importers in responding to CBP’s request for information. CBP agreed that releasing an unredacted sample or image to importers will help importers to provide meaningful support that the suspect merchandise is genuine.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Trade Law

2023-01-26

At the end of last year, World Trade Organization (WTO) members agreed that the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) of the WTO will take place in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), in February 2024. There is no doubt that the WTO is facing headwinds and is in need of a vigorous push forward. The UAE’s success in transforming itself into a global trade and digital hub and a leader in services trade could serve to drive a successful outcome at MC13.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-17

On December 21, 2022, the appeal arbitrators in the Colombia – Frozen Fries (DS591) World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute circulated their award (the “Award”). This was the second appeal conducted under Article 25 of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) and the first appeal under the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), a framework created by a group of WTO members to overcome the challenges posed by the non-operational Appellate Body.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-02-10

The United Kingdom just issued a new statutory instrument, effective immediately, which extends the authority to designate persons and entities under the U.K. sanctions against Russia.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-06-10

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin Gump’s webinar, “Protecting the Crown Jewels - New U.K. National Security Rules for Foreign Investment in a Post-COVID-19, Post-Brexit World.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-05-07

The clock is ticking down to the entry into force of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) on July 1, 2020.  Leading up to that date, businesses have a unique advocacy opportunity to influence the implementing regulations and associated processes, such as legislative changes to Mexico’s domestic laws. Additionally, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), along with their Mexican and Canadian counterparts, have begun issuing guidance for the trade community seeking to obtain the benefits of the agreement. At this time, these guidance documents include a petition process for automakers to request alternative staging for the automotive rules of origin as well as general interim implementation instructions for USMCA entries. Still to come are regulations regarding the automotive labor value content requirements and Uniform Regulations regarding the customs provisions. Akin Gump and our partners at Dorantes Advisors in Mexico City have jointly developed brief summaries of these guidance documents and a timeline of key actions still to take place prior to entry into force. The materials are available here in both English and Spanish.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-03-02

Last week, in a highly anticipated decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) concluded that Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 does not offend the non-delegation doctrine. To most observers, the ruling does not come as a surprise, but the story on Section 232 and the non-delegation doctrine is not yet over.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.