United States and European Union Impose Broad Economic Sanctions Against Russia

Jul 30, 2014

Reading Time : 4 min

A. U.S. Sanctions

During a speech at the White House on July 29, President Obama announced additional sanctions against Russia. The measures include:

  • a prohibition on exports of certain goods and technology to Russia’s energy sector
  • a suspension of credit that encourages exports to Russia and financing for economic development projects in Russia
  • designation of certain Russian banks and defense companies as Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDNs) and Sectoral Sanctions Identifications List (SSIL) entities.

Under the first of these new sanctions measures, the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) will implement a policy of denial with regard to any “export, reexport or foreign transfer of certain items for use in Russia’s energy sector that may be used for exploration or production from deepwater, Arctic offshore, or shale projects that have the potential to produce oil.” BIS notes that, “[w]hile these sanctions do not target or interfere with the current supply of energy from Russia or prevent Russian companies from selling oil and gas to any country, they make it difficult for Russia to develop long-term, technically challenging future projects.” 1

Additionally, the Department of Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) expanded its sanctions designations to include additional Russian financial and defense companies. First, OFAC added OJSC United Shipbuilding Corporation, a Russian defense technology company, to its SDN list, prohibiting U.S. persons from engaging in any transactions with the company. In conjunction with OFAC’s SDN designation, BIS also added OJSC United Shipbuilding Corporation to its Entity List. As a result, all exports, reexports or other foreign transfers of commodities, software and technology subject to the Export Administration Regulations now require a license to be transferred to OJSC United Shipbuilding Corporation, and the Department of Commerce will consider such license requests with a presumption of denial.2

Second, OFAC added the following entities to the SSIL, prohibiting U.S. persons from transacting in, providing financing for or otherwise dealing in new debt of longer than 90 days maturity or new debt for these persons, their property or their interests in property:

  • Bank of Moscow, Russia
  • Russian Agricultural Bank, Russia
  • VTB Bank OAO, Russia

See OFAC’s designations here.

B. EU Sanctions

In coordination with the United States, the EU also announced additional sanctions against Russia on July 29, 2014. These measures, according to a statement released by the Council of the European Union, include:

  • a prohibition against EU nationals and companies “buy[ing] or sell[ing] new bonds, equity or similar financial instruments with a maturity exceeding 90 days, issued by major state-owned Russian banks, development banks, their subsidiaries and those acting on their behalf. Services related to the issuing of such financial instruments, e.g., brokering, are also prohibited.”
  • an embargo “on the import and export of arms and related materials from/to Russia” covered under the EU common military list.
  • a prohibition on “exports of dual use goods and technology for military use in Russia or to Russian military end-users. All items in the EU list of dual use goods are included.”
  • a requirement of prior authorization to export “certain energy-related equipment and technology to Russia”; export licenses will be denied “if products are destined for deep water oil exploration and production, arctic oil exploration or production and shale oil projects in Russia.”

The measures above apply to only new contracts and will be effective the day following publication in the EU Official Journal, which is scheduled for July 31, 2014. The sanctions will initially last for 12 months, but will be reviewed by the end of October, according to an EU official. The EU would require unanimity to invalidate the measures before the 12 months are up.3

In addition, the EU announced additional restrictions for Crimea and Sevastopol banning new investment in the following sectors: “infrastructure projects in the transportation, telecommunications and energy sectors and in relation to the exploitation of oil, gas and minerals.” The EU will also prohibit the export of “key equipment” to these six sectors in Crimea and Sevastopol and also ban “finance and insurance services related to such transactions.”

Finally, the EU agreed to expand its targeted sanctions to include eight additional individuals close to President Vladimir Putin and three entities deemed to have “provided support to or benefited from Russian decision makers responsible for the destabilization of Eastern Ukraine and the illegal annexation of Crimea.” The list of these individuals is set to be published on July 30.

To see the statement by the EU outlining the sanctions, see here.

C. Japan Sanctions

Senior Japanese government officials also announced, on July 28, 2014, that Japan will likely impose asset freezes against individuals and groups supporting the separation of Crimea from Ukraine, as well as restrictions on imports from Crimea. Japan will also follow a recent decision by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development to deny funds for new projects in Russia.

Japan’s cabinet must still approve these measures, which is expected to happen later this week. Once the measures receive approval, Japan’s foreign ministry will publish a list of individuals and groups subject to the sanctions measures.4


1 See U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Commerce Department Expands Export Restrictions on Russia (July 29, 2014), available at http://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/about-bis/newsroom/press-releases/107-about-bis/newsroom/press-releases/press-release-2014/710-u-s-commerce-department-expands-export-restrictions-on-russia.

2 See id.

3 See James G. Neuger & Jonathan Stearns, EU Aims at Russian Banks, Technology in Widest Sanctions, Bloomberg (July 29, 2014), available at http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-07-29/eu-aims-at-russian-banks-technology-in-widest-sanctions-yet.html.

4 See Mari Yamaguchi, Associated Press, Japan to Step Up Sanctions Against Russia (July 28, 2014), available at http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/japan-step-sanctions-russia-24737327.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Trade Law

2023-01-26

At the end of last year, World Trade Organization (WTO) members agreed that the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) of the WTO will take place in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), in February 2024. There is no doubt that the WTO is facing headwinds and is in need of a vigorous push forward. The UAE’s success in transforming itself into a global trade and digital hub and a leader in services trade could serve to drive a successful outcome at MC13.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-17

On December 21, 2022, the appeal arbitrators in the Colombia – Frozen Fries (DS591) World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute circulated their award (the “Award”). This was the second appeal conducted under Article 25 of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) and the first appeal under the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), a framework created by a group of WTO members to overcome the challenges posed by the non-operational Appellate Body.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-02-10

The United Kingdom just issued a new statutory instrument, effective immediately, which extends the authority to designate persons and entities under the U.K. sanctions against Russia.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-06-10

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin Gump’s webinar, “Protecting the Crown Jewels - New U.K. National Security Rules for Foreign Investment in a Post-COVID-19, Post-Brexit World.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-05-07

The clock is ticking down to the entry into force of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) on July 1, 2020.  Leading up to that date, businesses have a unique advocacy opportunity to influence the implementing regulations and associated processes, such as legislative changes to Mexico’s domestic laws. Additionally, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), along with their Mexican and Canadian counterparts, have begun issuing guidance for the trade community seeking to obtain the benefits of the agreement. At this time, these guidance documents include a petition process for automakers to request alternative staging for the automotive rules of origin as well as general interim implementation instructions for USMCA entries. Still to come are regulations regarding the automotive labor value content requirements and Uniform Regulations regarding the customs provisions. Akin Gump and our partners at Dorantes Advisors in Mexico City have jointly developed brief summaries of these guidance documents and a timeline of key actions still to take place prior to entry into force. The materials are available here in both English and Spanish.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-03-02

Last week, in a highly anticipated decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) concluded that Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 does not offend the non-delegation doctrine. To most observers, the ruling does not come as a surprise, but the story on Section 232 and the non-delegation doctrine is not yet over.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.