House Education and Labor Committee Holds Markup of the Build Back Better Act

Sep 10, 2021

Reading Time : 7 min

By: Francine E. Friedman, Madison Hughes (Public Policy Specialist)

In his opening statement, Chair Bobby Scott (D-VA) said that the Build Back Better Act would transform the U.S. economy and make the U.S. more “prosperous, equitable and fairer” through investments in workers, families and students.

Chair Scott discussed various provisions included in the legislation, including investments:

  1. To expand access to child care and higher education.
  2. To improve the infrastructure of historically black colleges and universities and local educational agencies.
  3. To augment participation in workforce development systems.
  4. To increase on-the-job safety for workers.
  5. To fortify childhood nutrition programs.

Ranking Member Virginia Foxx (R-NC) described the Build Back Better Act as “a socialist hand out to liberals” and stated that it would “obliterate future economic prosperity” in her opening statement. She opposed various provisions included in the bill, including universal child care, free community college and public school infrastructure grants.

Throughout the mark up, several education-related amendments were debated and voted on. Below is a chart with both the Manager’s Amendment (which will serve as the base for the Education and Labor section of the House Budget Reconciliation legislation) and amendments considered by the committee.

Sponsor Description

Outcome

Rep. Scott (D-VA)

Manager's Amendment.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.
Adopted, voice vote
Rep. Wilson (R-SC)

Reallocates $3.2 billion of the Act from the Corporation for National and Community Service – also known as AmeriCorps – to an industry-recognized apprenticeship program.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.
Rejected, 21 to 28
Rep. Adams (D-NC)

Alters the Research and Development Infrastructure for Minority Serving Institutions Competitive Grant Program outlined in Section 20042 of the Act.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.
Withdrawn
Rep. Walberg (R-MI)

Allows funding allocated via Subtitle D of the Act – relating to universal child care for children aged zero to five – to be used at sectarian institutions.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.
Rejected, 20 to 28
Rep. Keller (R-PA)

Denies students from families with yearly incomes over $400,000 per year access to tuition-free community college programs appropriated via the Act.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.
Rejected, 21 to 27
Rep. Banks (R-IN)

Prevents institutions of higher education that hosts a Confucius Institute from receiving funds appropriated via the Act.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.
Rejected, 22 to 26
Rep. Banks (R-IN)

Bans the use of Pell Grants to support research conducted for or behalf of China or affiliated organizations.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.
Rejected, 20 to 28
Rep. Cawthorn (R-NC)

Ensures that institutions of higher education, which receive funding via the Act, use a percentage of their federally-backed resources to support students and employees evacuated from Afghanistan on or after Sunday, August 15, 2021.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.
Rejected, 21 to 28
Rep. Allen (R-GA)

Directs the Government Accountability Office (U.S. GAO) to conduct a study on the long-term impact of higher education spending appropriated via the Act on the cost of tuition and labor outcomes.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.
Rejected, 22 to 28
Rep. Allen (R-GA)

Requires institutions of higher education to repay Pell Grants in excess of $6,495 received by students who do not complete their course of study or do not transfer within one year of their initial withdrawal from a higher education program.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.

Rejected, 22 to 28
Rep. Thompson (R-PA)

Directs the Department of Agriculture (USDA) to provide an additional two cent reimbursement for each breakfast served via the school breakfast program.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.

Rejected, 22 to 28
Rep. Murphy (R-NC)

Prohibits institutions of higher education from receiving funds appropriated via the Act unless they provide the Department of Education (DE) a written assurance that they will uphold the principles of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.

Rejected, 22 to 28
Rep. Leger Fernandez (D-NM)

Allows art and entertainment-based workforce development and employment opportunities to be eligible for Industry or Sector Partnership Grants.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.

Adopted via voice vote
Rep. McClain (R-MI)

Permits the use of Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act funding appropriated via the Act to be used to attract, inform and bolster public awareness regarding skilled trade programs.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.

Rejected, 22 to 28
Rep. Steel (R-CA)

Requires local educational agencies to make available a description of how in-person instruction will be made available to certain subgroups of the student population in order to be eligible for the Rebuild America’s School Grant Program appropriated via the Act.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.

Rejected, 22 to 28
Rep. Grothman (R-WI)

Excludes beneficiaries of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program from accessing the Pell Grant system.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.

Rejected, 21 to 28
Rep. Grothman (R-WI)

Strikes language relating to universal child care from the Act.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.

Rejected, 22 to 28
Rep. Grothman (R-WI)

Removes language relating to the Competitive Integrated Employment Transformation Grant Program from the Act.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.

Rejected, 20 to 29
Rep. Grothman (R-WI)

Amends the Higher Education Act of 1965 and allows institutions of higher education – at the discretion of its financial aid administer – to prorate or limit the amount of loan any student may borrower per academic year.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.

Rejected via voice vote
Rep. Grothman (R-WI)

Strikes language related to increasing the maximum federal Pell Grant from the Act.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.

Rejected, 22 to 28
Rep. Miller-Meeks (R-IA)

Limits eligibility for tuition-free community college to households with incomes less than $400,000 per year.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.

Rejected, 22 to 27
Rep. Fitzgerald (R-WI)

Directs local educational agencies benefiting from school infrastructure funding under the Act to certify that it does not restrict the lease of vacant school buildings to public charter schools.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.

Rejected, 21 to 27

Rep. Fitzgerald (R-WI)

Prevents individuals convicted of sexual assault, trafficking or other related crimes from accessing tuition-free community college provided via the Act.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.

Rejected, 21 to 28
Rep. Fitzgerald (R-WI)

Make ineligible institutions of higher education determined to be associated or affiliated with a foreign adversary from receiving funds appropriated under the Act.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.

Rejected, 21 to 28
Rep. Sherrill (D-NJ)

Provides all households – regardless of yearly income – access to universal child care benefits created via the Act.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.

Adopted, 28 to 21
Rep. Harshbarger (R-TN)

Replaces references to “tuition-free” community college and “free” child care with “federal-taxpayer funded” community college and child care throughout the Act.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.

Rejected, 22 to 28
Rep. Letlow (R-LA)

Strikes language relating to tuition-free community college from the Act.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.

Rejected, 22 to 28
Rep. Miller (R-IL)

Prohibits local educational agencies receiving resources via the Act from offering students under the age of consent a COVID-19 vaccine without the express permission of a parent or guardian.

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.

Rejected, 22 to 28
Rep. Miller (R-IL)

Prohibits public community colleges receiving resources via the Act from administering abortion-related health care at a student-based service site. 

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.

Rejected, 22 to 28
Rep. Scott (D-VA)

Makes technical changes to the Act to ensure that program administration funds for workforce development programs are available for additional workforce development programs by the Department of Labor (DOL).

Please find a copy of the Amendment here.

Adopted via a voice vote

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Study Guide

May 21, 2024

The U.S. Department of Education recently issued final regulations governing Title IX, the federal civil rights law prohibiting sex-based discrimination in education programs or activities—such as public or private schools, universities, local or state educational agencies, and museums—that receive federal financial assistance. These new regulations, issued on April 19, 2024, and slated to go into effect on August 1, 2024, make significant changes to the prior Title IX regulations issued in 2020. Whereas the 2020 regulations included a narrower definition of sexual harassment and focused on due process concerns, the 2024 regulations—more akin to the regulations under the Obama administration—broaden the focus of Title IX to sex-based harassment more generally.

...

Read More

Study Guide

September 27, 2023

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) recently moved forward with a controversial new policy requiring foreign subrecipients to provide, at least once per year, copies of lab notebooks, data and documentation that support research outcomes described in a progress report to the prime award recipient. The new policy is in direct response to recent audits conducted by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (DHHS OIG) and the Government Accountability Office (GAO), each of which raised concerns about NIH’s oversight of funds provided to, among other institutions, the Wuhan Institute of Virology. More generally, the new NIH policy is among the latest salvos in the government’s ongoing efforts to impose stricter security requirements on U.S. taxpayer-funded research.

Read More

...

Read More

Study Guide

August 16, 2023

On July 28, 2023, the Biden administration issued “Executive Order on Federal Research and Development in Support of Domestic Manufacturing and United States Jobs” (the “Executive Order”). How federal agencies implement certain of the Executive Order’s provisions may have a meaningful impact on the existing university, academic medical center, and independent research institution technology transfer processes. Moreover, when viewed in conjunction with other recent actions, the Executive Order is further indicia of the administration’s ongoing assessment and evaluation of the Bayh-Dole Act's technology transfer model. Universities and other research institutions should therefore continue to closely monitor technology transfer-related developments and weigh in when offered an opportunity to participate in rule-making or other legislative or regulatory processes.

Read More

...

Read More

Study Guide

August 2, 2023

Congressional Republicans are increasingly focused on ensuring that U.S. colleges and universities are properly disclosing gifts and contracts from foreign sources under Section 117 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C. §1011f (“Section 117”). The Higher Education and Workforce Development Subcommittee of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce (the “Committee”) held a hearing on July 18, 2023 titled Exposing the Dangers of the Influence of Foreign Adversaries on College Campuses, which discussed the enforcement, and even potential expansion, of Section 117.

...

Read More

Study Guide

July 5, 2023

Following the Supreme Court’s June 30, 2023 ruling determining that the Biden-Harris administration did not have authority to carry out its student debt forgiveness plan, the administration released a fact sheet detailing new actions to provide debt relief and support for student loan borrowers.

...

Read More

Study Guide

June 30, 2023

On June 29, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court released its highly anticipated decision that overturned 45 years of protection for colleges and universities considering the race of applicants in their admissions process. The Court found that the use of race-conscious admissions by the University of North Carolina and Harvard University is not constitutional.

...

Read More

Study Guide

June 30, 2023

On June 30, in Biden v. Nebraska, the Supreme Court ruled against the Biden administration’s student loan relief plan in a 6-3 decision. The plan, which was estimated to impact more than $430 billion of student loan principal, would have canceled student loan debt for more than 40 million borrowers.

...

Read More

Study Guide

March 27, 2023

H.R. 5, the Parental Bill of Rights Act, passed in the House of Representatives on Friday, March 24, 2023 by a vote of 213 – 208. Only Republicans supported the bill and five Republicans – Reps. Andy Biggs, Ken Buck, Matt Gaetz, Mike Lawler, and Matt Rosendale – joined all House Democrats in voting against the bill.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.