Ecuador Imposes Safeguard Import Tariffs

Mar 10, 2015

Reading Time : 2 min

Ecuador’s safeguard measure targets imported consumer goods and raw materials, and the additional tariff amount varies by product category. The general categories of products subject to the measure and the amount of duties applicable to each product category are as follows:

Additional Duty Percentage

Products

5

Nonessential capital goods and raw materials

15

Goods with intermediate sensitivity

25

Tires, ceramics, television knockdown kits (CKDs) and motorcycle CKDs

45

Consumer goods, televisions and motorcycles

 

The following products will not be subject to additional duties:

1. raw materials and capital goods
2. personal hygiene and home care products
3. medicines and medical equipment
4. auto parts
5. fuels and lubricants
6. importations made using express courier services
7. personal belongings.

Ecuador has provided a detailed list of products subject to the measure, and we can provide additional information about specific products upon request.

Since falling oil prices have reduced Ecuador’s export revenue, Ecuador is trying to address its balance of payments situation by limiting imports to restrict the outflow of revenue. Ecuador has implemented similar safeguards in the past. Most recently, in January 2015, Ecuador imposed import tariffs on goods from Colombia and Peru, which were lifted in February 2015 after negotiations with both countries.

Ecuador is expected to notify the World Trade Organization (WTO) of its balance of payments measure this week. Although the WTO allows members to adopt import restrictions to safeguard their balance of payments situations, such measures are strictly regulated as to both their justification and the manner in which they are applied. Under the procedures set out in Article XII and Article XVIII:B of GATT 1994 and the Understanding on the Balance-of-Payments Provisions of the GATT 1994 (“Understanding”), Ecuador must enter into consultations with other WTO members, in the context of the Committee on Balance of Payment Restrictions (“Committee”), within four months of adoption of its balance of payments safeguard. The Committee has proven to be an effective mechanism for ensuring that members comply with the disciplines of Article XII, Article XVIII:B and the Understanding.

Ecuador’s consultations with the Committee will focus on the nature of Ecuador’s balance of payments difficulties, the availability of less restrictive corrective measures and the possible effect of the restrictions on the economies of other members. As part of this process, Ecuador will be asked to prepare and submit to the Committee a more detailed document on its balance of payments situation. In addition, the WTO Secretariat will prepare a background report, and a representative of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) will be asked to prepare a statement. At the end of the process, the Committee will issue a report reflecting the discussion and the Committee’s conclusions. In addition to the consultations held within the Committee, balance of payments safeguards may be challenged in WTO dispute settlements.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Trade Law

July 19, 2024

Views expressed by Alan Yanovich.1

...

Read More

Trade Law

February 9, 2023

With the enactment of the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the announcement of the European Union (EU) Green Deal Industrial Plan, there is now a full-fledged subsidy war between the United States and the European Union. While these subsidies are meant to encourage green technologies, incentivizing firms to produce locally would seem to be an almost as important policy goal. And it is not limited to the U.S. and the EU. Global Trade Alert recently reported that, in 2022, production subsidies accounted for half of all trade-distorting measures, making it the mostly commonly used harmful trade policy measure.1

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-26

At the end of last year, World Trade Organization (WTO) members agreed that the 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13) of the WTO will take place in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), in February 2024. There is no doubt that the WTO is facing headwinds and is in need of a vigorous push forward. The UAE’s success in transforming itself into a global trade and digital hub and a leader in services trade could serve to drive a successful outcome at MC13.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2023-01-17

On December 21, 2022, the appeal arbitrators in the Colombia – Frozen Fries (DS591) World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute circulated their award (the “Award”). This was the second appeal conducted under Article 25 of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) and the first appeal under the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), a framework created by a group of WTO members to overcome the challenges posed by the non-operational Appellate Body.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-02-10

The United Kingdom just issued a new statutory instrument, effective immediately, which extends the authority to designate persons and entities under the U.K. sanctions against Russia.

...

Read More

Trade Law

2022-01-24

Washington, D.C. partner Kevin Wolf, London partner Jasper Helder and Emily Kilcrease with the Center for New American Security submitted a detailed comment to U.S. and EU export control authorities to help guide and inform efforts to rationalize U.S. and EU export controls.  It can also be a useful resource for anyone interested in the topic and wanting to understand the history and context to current export control policy issues. They note that the US-EU Joint Statement on the role and purpose of export controls “is far more significant than generally recognized because it is the first time the EU (represented by the EC) or any other US ally has stated so explicitly and publicly since the end of the Cold War an agreement with the US that export controls should be used to achieve country-specific and other policy objectives not directly related to weapons of mass destruction or conventional military items.”

...

Read More

Trade Law

2020-06-10

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin Gump’s webinar, “Protecting the Crown Jewels - New U.K. National Security Rules for Foreign Investment in a Post-COVID-19, Post-Brexit World.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.