Redskins’ Trademarks are Cancelled

Jun 14, 2014

Reading Time : 1 min
  • What is the meaning of the matter in question, as it appears in the marks and as those marks are used in the connection of goods and services?
  • Is the meaning of the marks one that may disparage Native Americans?”

In establishing disparagement, the Board ruled the first prong of the test met as the term REDSKINS within the registered mark [at the time of registration] did refer to Native Americans. Second, the Board found the term REDSKINS to be disparaging during the relevant time period upon reviewing evidence presented by Petitioners, including linguistic analysis of the word and views of the referenced group. Therefore, a cancellation of the trademarks was appropriate.

Amanda Blackhorse, Marcus Briggs­Cloud, Phillip Gover, Jillian  Pappan and Courtney Tsotigh v. Pro­Football, Inc., Cancellation No. 92046185 (TTAB June 18, 2014) [Kuhlke (opinion), Cataldo and Bergsman]

Share This Insight

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.