Akin Gump Partners Discuss Bid Protest Process for Defense Contractors

September 25, 2013

Reading Time : 1 min

Contact:

Jacinta O'Shea-Ramdeholl

Director of Communications

Sarah Richmond

Senior Communications Manager

In the Law360 article “5 Key Tactics For Defense Cos. Planning A Bid Protest,” Akin Gump litigation partners Thomas McLish and Scott Heimberg offer advice to those wishing to contest a losing bid.

McLish tells Law360 that some contractors may not understand the purpose of the protest process. He says, “It’s not an appeal process where you get a chance to explain why you’re the better offeror.” Instead, McLish says, the best way to secure a rebid situation is to poke holes in an agency’s actions and show how it didn’t adhere to its own rules.” McLish also recommends that contractors consider whether filing a protest could alienate the agency in question.

Heimberg’s comments focus on incumbent contractors and how they should handle bid protests. He notes that when a contract is ongoing and a protest is filed, “it tends to get extended for a time while the protest is being addressed.” This, in turn, could lead to additional work until the protest process is complete.

To read the full article, please click here.

Share This Insight

Related Services, Sectors, and Regions

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.