Bloomberg Law Publishes Akin Gump Article on Admitting Evidence for Class Certification

August 13, 2018

Reading Time : 1 min

Contact:

Jacinta O'Shea-Ramdeholl

Director of Communications

Sarah Richmond

Senior Communications Manager

Bloomberg Law has published the article “INSIGHT: The Ninth Circuit’s Inadvertent Case For Imposing Daubert at Class Certification,” written by Neal Marder and Andrew Jick, partner and counsel, respectively, in the litigation practice at Akin Gump, and Geoffrey Derrick, associate in the labor and employment practice.

The article explores the ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in Sali v. Corona Regional Medical Center that a plaintiff’s evidence for class certification need not be admissible. The authors examine how this decision affects whether a district court must ensure that all expert testimony at the class certification stage satisfies Daubert.

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc. was the 1993 Supreme Court decision that determined the standard for admitting expert testimony in federal courts. Marder, Jick and Derrick observe that “some courts are reluctant to perform a full Daubert analysis at the class certification stage.”

To read the full article, please click here.

Share This Insight

Related Services, Sectors, and Regions

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.