Neal Marder Talks Class Actions with Metro Corp Counsel

September 28, 2016

Reading Time : 2 min

Contact:

Jacinta O'Shea-Ramdeholl

Director of Communications

Scott Wasserman

Senior Media Relations Manager

Akin Gump litigation partner Neal Marder was interviewed by Metropolitan Corporate Counsel, the result being the article “Master a New Specialty: Class Actions: Leading litigator offers lessons for managing — and defeating — class actions.”

In it, Marder discusses his own nearly two-decade-long  class action practice as well as areas of interest in that field currently. Some of the topics covered include:

  • The impact of Tyson on class action plaintiffs and defenders: “[T]he Tyson decision is not a complete victory for either the plaintiffs’ or the defense bar In Tyson, the Supreme Court held that the plaintiffs in that case could rely on statistical evidence to prove their claims on a class-wide basis, and this satisfied the predominance requirement. In the coming years, plaintiffs will surely attempt to push the boundaries by using statistical evidence in other cases to avoid creating an individualized issue that would prevent certification. But the scope of Tyson was fairly narrow. The Court emphasized that it will be a case-specific inquiry as to whether plaintiffs can rely on statistical evidence. It also remains to be seen whether and to what extent plaintiffs will have success under a Tyson theory outside of the Fair Labor Standards Act context.”
  • The key to early victories in defeating class certification: “I would say the key is being creative and utilizing every procedural technique available to attack the merits of the claims, as well as the class allegations, by challenging the court to comply with its obligation to undertake a ‘rigorous analysis’ of the class claims and Rule 23 requirements.”
  • The issue of ascertainability in class certification: “Several courts have held class plaintiffs to a high standard in demonstrating that the proposed class can be readily ascertained before granting class certification. The majority of circuits now apply a ‘heightened’ standard that requires that the class is ‘defined with reference to objective criteria’ and that there is a ‘reliable and administratively feasible mechanism for determining whether putative class members fall within the class definition.’ However, there is a split in authority regarding the ascertainability requirement. Some circuits have adopted a less rigorous ascertainability analysis. On Monday, the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument in two relevant cases – In re ConAgra Food and Brazil v. Dole Packaged Foods, LLC – so the appropriate standard in this circuit will hopefully be clarified soon.”

To read the full interview, please click here.

Share This Insight

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.