Rex Heinke and Pratik Shah Quoted by Law360 on Common SCOTUS Petitioner Errors

February 27, 2015

Reading Time : 1 min

Contact:

Jacinta O'Shea-Ramdeholl

Director of Communications

Sarah Richmond

Senior Communications Manager

Law360, for its article “5 Ways To Botch A Supreme Court Petition,” quoted Akin Gump Supreme Court and appellate practice co-heads Rex Heinke and Pratik Shah on common errors made by attorneys petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court.

The article notes that one of the mistakes made is overloading a petition with facts. Heinke said, “The focus of the cert petition has to be on why the Supreme Court should grant review, not why the decision below was wrong.” He added that the plea should showcase the fundamental legal questions that were unanswered by the lower court or contradicted by governing Supreme Court precedent.

With regard to exaggerating splits among the circuit courts, Shah said, “As soon as you start entering down the territory of making it seem too messy … then it starts becoming a fact issue.”  He also recommended focusing on jurisdictional questions such as “clean” circuit splits and added, “To me that is the first and foremost goal of anything.”

Share This Insight

People Mentioned in This News

Related Services, Sectors, and Regions

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.