UK 2015 Budget–Changes to the North Sea Tax Regime

Apr 9, 2015

Reading Time : 1 min

By: Hannah Marshall, trainee solicitor (not admitted to practice)

What are the 2015 Budget oil and gas tax cuts?

Reduction to Supplementary Charge

  • The headline change is a reduction in the supplementary charge from 30 percent to 20 percent. The supplementary charge is applied on a company’s ring-fenced oil and gas profits and is in addition to corporation tax (applied at 30 percent).
  • This reduction follows a recent 2 percent reduction down to 30 percent (from 32 percent) announced in the Autumn Statement 2014 and represents a dramatic turnaround, given that the charge was raised to 32 percent (from 20 percent) only in 2011.
  • The reduction in supplementary charge will be backdated, with effect from 1 January 2015.

Reduction to Petroleum Revenue Tax

  • The Petroleum Revenue Tax (PRT) rate will be reduced from 50 percent to 35 percent, with effect from 1 January 2016.
  • PRT is an individual field-based tax on profits from oil and gas production that applies to only mature fields that were given development consent before 16 March 1993. 

UK Continental Shelf Investment Allowance

  • A new investment allowance has been introduced, reducing the profits subject to the supplementary charge tax and simplifying the existing ad hoc allowance regime.   
  • The investment allowance is designed to encourage new spending and will remove an amount equal to 62.5 percent of investment expenditure from a company’s ring-fenced profits.
  • The allowance will apply to investment expenditure incurred on or after 1 April 2015.

What are the reactions to the changes?

The U.K. Treasury proclaims the proposed tax cuts as worth £1.3 billion to the industry and expects the changes to result in an additional £4 billion of additional investment, with extra production of 120 million barrels.

While the market seems to view these changes positively and agree that the tax cuts do increase the possibility of greater investment, notes of caution have been sounded by many commentators, who warn that these tax changes are not alone enough to revive the North Sea region. Many commentators argue that there needs to be a greater focus on exploration incentives and the current decommissioning regime, which poses a significant barrier to investment, given the mature nature of many fields in the region.

Share This Insight

Categories

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

August 07, 2024

*Thank you to JaKell Larson, 2024 Akin Summer Associate, for her valuable collaboration on this article.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 31, 2024

Interstate oil, liquid and refined products pipelines regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) will soon be able to raise their transportation rates (provided they were set using FERC’s popular Index rate methodology) in the wake of a significant new decision by the District of Columbia Circuit (the D.C. Circuit) in Liquid Energy Pipeline Association v. FERC (LEPA).

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 29, 2024

On Wednesday, July 24, 2024, the U.S. House of Representative Committee on Energy and Commerce held a Subcommittee on Energy, Climate, and Grid Security hearing to review the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Request. Members of the Subcommittee had the opportunity to hear testimony from all five Commissioners, including FERC Chairman Willie Phillips and Commissioner Mark Christie, as well as the three recently confirmed commissioners, David Rosner, Lindsay See and Judy Chang. In addition to their prepared remarks, the five commissioners answered questions on FERC’s mandate to provide affordable and reliable electricity and natural gas services nationwide, while also ensuring it fulfills its primary mission of maintaining just and reasonable rates.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 29, 2024

On July 9, 2024, the U.S. Court of the Appeals for the D.C. Circuit held that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) erred in ordering refunds for certain bilateral spot market transactions in the Western Energy Coordinating Council (WECC) region that exceeded the $1,000/megawatt-hour (MWh) “soft” price cap for such sales.1 Finding FERC failed to conduct a “Mobile-Sierra public-interest analysis” before “altering” those contracts by ordering refunds, the court vacated FERC’s orders and remanded the case to FERC for further proceedings.2

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 8, 2024

On June 28, 2024, in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., which for 40 years required court deference to reasonable agency interpretations of federal statutes in certain circumstances, even when the reviewing court would read the statute differently. The Court ended “Chevron deference” and held that courts “must exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether an agency has acted within its statutory authority.” In doing so, the Court upended a longstanding principle of administrative law that is likely to make agency decisions more susceptible to challenge in the courts.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 3, 2024

We are pleased to share a recording of Akin and ICF’s recently presented “Powering Progress: Decoding FERC Order No. 1920” webinar, along with the program materials.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 12, 2024

Join projects & energy transition partner Ben Reiter at Infocast's Transmission & Interconnection Summit, where he will moderate the “Dealing with the Impacts of Increased Interconnection Request Requirements and Costs” panel.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 4, 2024

Join projects & energy transition partners Hayden Harms and Vanessa Wilson at Infocast's RNG & SAF Capital Markets Summit, where Hayden will moderate the "Investor Perspectives: Private Equity, Infrastructure Funds, & Strategies" panel, and Vanessa will moderate the "Opportunities in Other Biogas/Fuels Markets" panel.

...

Read More

© 2024 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.