PHMSA Revises Pipeline Safety Enforcement Procedures to Strengthen Due Process and Transparency

June 10, 2025

Reading Time : 3 min

On June 4, 2025, the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) announced revisions to its procedures for pipeline safety enforcement actions. The changes, outlined in two new policy memoranda from PHMSA’s Office of the Chief Counsel (PHC), aim to enhance due process protections for pipeline operators by clarifying how civil penalties are calculated and expanding the disclosure of agency records in enforcement proceedings.

The reforms follow congressional direction, DOT General Counsel guidance and PHMSA’s stated commitment to fair and transparent enforcement. PHMSA will implement these updated policies for all ongoing and upcoming cases, but they will not be applied retroactively to matters that have already been closed. Acting Administrator Ben Kochman stated that the updated procedures are designed to “refocus our enforcement program so the law is applied fairly, transparently and in a way that respects the core legal principle of due process.”

Civil Penalty Calculation Policy Update

PHMSA has revised its policy for calculating proposed civil penalties in pipeline safety enforcement proceedings. Historically, PHMSA’s Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) used the version of its Civil Penalty Worksheet in effect at the time a Notice of Probable Violation (NOPV) was issued, even if that version reflected changes made after the date of the alleged violation. Under the new policy, OPS will calculate proposed penalties using the version of the Civil Penalty Worksheet in effect on the date of the alleged violation ensuring that operators are not penalized based on retroactive adjustments to penalty calculations.

Expanded Disclosure of Case File Materials

PHMSA is also revising its procedures for determining the contents of the case file in enforcement proceedings. Previously, OPS’s practice was to include only those records explicitly listed in its regulations at 49 CFR § 190.209(b). However, the Protecting our Infrastructure of Pipelines and Enhancing Safety Act of 2020 (2020 PIPES Act; P.L. 116-260) requires that enforcement case files include “all agency records pertinent to the matters of fact and law asserted.” Additionally, in March 2025, the Acting General Counsel of DOT issued a memorandum outlining new procedural requirements for DOT enforcement actions. These include a duty to affirmatively disclose certain types of evidence in accordance with the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Brady v. Maryland.

In response, PHMSA will develop and implement revised procedures to ensure that all required records including pertinent agency materials and exculpatory evidence are included in case files and made available to respondents. Additionally, PHC is advising OPS to account for other procedural protections when determining which agency records should be included, particularly in cases involving informal hearings before a Presiding Official. These strengthened disclosure obligations aim to enhance transparency and due process while enabling pipeline operators to fully exercise their procedural rights and mount an effective defense in enforcement actions.

Next Steps

PHMSA’s revised policies on civil penalty calculations and expanded disclosure of case file materials took effect through Chief Counsel memoranda issued on May 20 and May 29, 2025, respectively. The revised policies will apply to all pending and future enforcement cases but will not affect final agency actions already completed.

PHMSA’s revised enforcement procedures respond to longstanding concerns from industry stakeholders about the transparency and fairness of the agency’s enforcement practices. These changes may alter the dynamics of enforcement proceedings going forward, with operators likely to receive a more complete evidentiary record earlier in the process. Acting Administrator Kochman emphasized that the updated procedures reflect a broader shift, refocusing PHMSA on its core mission of safety enforcement rather than environmental regulation. As he stated, “These long overdue reforms will refocus our enforcement program, so the law is applied fairly, transparently, and in a way that respects the core legal principle of due process.”

Akin’s environment and natural resources, government contracts and corporate teams are well equipped to assist clients in navigating PHMSA enforcement proceedings.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

November 25, 2025

We are pleased to share the program materials and a recording of Akin’s recently presented webinar, “Navigating the Evolving Landscape of Corporate PPAs.”

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 12, 2025

On November 7, 2025, the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) reversed their prior positions and approved Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 Water Quality Certifications and other environmental permits for the Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Company’s (Transco) Northeast Supply Enhancement Project (NESE). NESE is a 25-mile natural gas pipeline expansion project certificated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) that is intended to deliver 400,000 dekatherms per day of natural gas produced in Pennsylvania to local distribution company customers in New York City through new facilities in Middlesex County, New Jersey and an underwater segment traversing the Raritan and Lower New York Bays.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

November 6, 2025

The market for the direct procurement of energy by commercial and industrial buyers has been active in the U.S. for a decade.  In years past, buyers often engaged in such purchases on a voluntary basis to achieve their goals to use renewable energy.  These days, C&I buyers are turning to direct procurement or self-supply to obtain a reliable source of energy.  Sufficient and accessible energy from a local utility may not be available or may be materially delayed or trigger significant capital costs.  This is a material change driven in part by increased demand for electricity, including demand from data centers, EV infrastructure and industrial development.       

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 27, 2025

On October 23, 2025, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) directed the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to conduct a rulemaking to assert jurisdiction over load interconnections to the bulk electric transmission system and establish standardized procedures for the interconnection of large loads.1 The Directive included an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANOPR) that sets forth the legal justification for asserting jurisdiction over transmission-level load interconnections and fourteen principles that should inform FERC’s rulemaking process. The Secretary has directed FERC to take “final action” on the Directive no later than April 30, 2026.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.