PHMSA Revises Pipeline Safety Enforcement Procedures to Strengthen Due Process and Transparency

June 10, 2025

Reading Time : 3 min

On June 4, 2025, the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) announced revisions to its procedures for pipeline safety enforcement actions. The changes, outlined in two new policy memoranda from PHMSA’s Office of the Chief Counsel (PHC), aim to enhance due process protections for pipeline operators by clarifying how civil penalties are calculated and expanding the disclosure of agency records in enforcement proceedings.

The reforms follow congressional direction, DOT General Counsel guidance and PHMSA’s stated commitment to fair and transparent enforcement. PHMSA will implement these updated policies for all ongoing and upcoming cases, but they will not be applied retroactively to matters that have already been closed. Acting Administrator Ben Kochman stated that the updated procedures are designed to “refocus our enforcement program so the law is applied fairly, transparently and in a way that respects the core legal principle of due process.”

Civil Penalty Calculation Policy Update

PHMSA has revised its policy for calculating proposed civil penalties in pipeline safety enforcement proceedings. Historically, PHMSA’s Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) used the version of its Civil Penalty Worksheet in effect at the time a Notice of Probable Violation (NOPV) was issued, even if that version reflected changes made after the date of the alleged violation. Under the new policy, OPS will calculate proposed penalties using the version of the Civil Penalty Worksheet in effect on the date of the alleged violation ensuring that operators are not penalized based on retroactive adjustments to penalty calculations.

Expanded Disclosure of Case File Materials

PHMSA is also revising its procedures for determining the contents of the case file in enforcement proceedings. Previously, OPS’s practice was to include only those records explicitly listed in its regulations at 49 CFR § 190.209(b). However, the Protecting our Infrastructure of Pipelines and Enhancing Safety Act of 2020 (2020 PIPES Act; P.L. 116-260) requires that enforcement case files include “all agency records pertinent to the matters of fact and law asserted.” Additionally, in March 2025, the Acting General Counsel of DOT issued a memorandum outlining new procedural requirements for DOT enforcement actions. These include a duty to affirmatively disclose certain types of evidence in accordance with the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Brady v. Maryland.

In response, PHMSA will develop and implement revised procedures to ensure that all required records including pertinent agency materials and exculpatory evidence are included in case files and made available to respondents. Additionally, PHC is advising OPS to account for other procedural protections when determining which agency records should be included, particularly in cases involving informal hearings before a Presiding Official. These strengthened disclosure obligations aim to enhance transparency and due process while enabling pipeline operators to fully exercise their procedural rights and mount an effective defense in enforcement actions.

Next Steps

PHMSA’s revised policies on civil penalty calculations and expanded disclosure of case file materials took effect through Chief Counsel memoranda issued on May 20 and May 29, 2025, respectively. The revised policies will apply to all pending and future enforcement cases but will not affect final agency actions already completed.

PHMSA’s revised enforcement procedures respond to longstanding concerns from industry stakeholders about the transparency and fairness of the agency’s enforcement practices. These changes may alter the dynamics of enforcement proceedings going forward, with operators likely to receive a more complete evidentiary record earlier in the process. Acting Administrator Kochman emphasized that the updated procedures reflect a broader shift, refocusing PHMSA on its core mission of safety enforcement rather than environmental regulation. As he stated, “These long overdue reforms will refocus our enforcement program, so the law is applied fairly, transparently, and in a way that respects the core legal principle of due process.”

Akin’s environment and natural resources, government contracts and corporate teams are well equipped to assist clients in navigating PHMSA enforcement proceedings.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

November 6, 2025

The market for the direct procurement of energy by commercial and industrial buyers has been active in the U.S. for a decade.  In years past, buyers often engaged in such purchases on a voluntary basis to achieve their goals to use renewable energy.  These days, C&I buyers are turning to direct procurement or self-supply to obtain a reliable source of energy.  Sufficient and accessible energy from a local utility may not be available or may be materially delayed or trigger significant capital costs.  This is a material change driven in part by increased demand for electricity, including demand from data centers, EV infrastructure and industrial development.       

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 27, 2025

On October 23, 2025, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) directed the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to conduct a rulemaking to assert jurisdiction over load interconnections to the bulk electric transmission system and establish standardized procedures for the interconnection of large loads.1 The Directive included an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANOPR) that sets forth the legal justification for asserting jurisdiction over transmission-level load interconnections and fourteen principles that should inform FERC’s rulemaking process. The Secretary has directed FERC to take “final action” on the Directive no later than April 30, 2026.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 24, 2025

On October 21, 2025, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) issued a final order (DOE/FECM Order No. 5264-A1) granting Venture Global CP2 LNG, LLC long-term authorization to export up to 1,446 billion cubic feet per year of domestically produced liquefied natural gas (LNG) from its Louisiana facility to countries without a free trade agreement with the United States (Non-FTA Countries). The final order follows a March 2025 Conditional Order,2 which issued while DOE was still completing its review of the agency’s 2024 LNG Export Study.3 The final order confirms that the project’s export volume and term authorization (through December 31, 2050) are unchanged, but provides for a three-year “make-up period” to allow export of any approved volume not shipped during the original term.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 9, 2025

On October 1, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued Order No. 914 amending certain Commission regulations to incorporate a conditional sunset date in compliance with the Trump administration’s April 2025 Executive Order, “Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting to Unleash American Energy” (the EO).

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 8, 2025

Akin is pleased to serve as a gold sponsor for Infocast’s Energy Independence Summit in Houston, October 21-23. Energy partner Charlie Ofner will moderate the Macroeconomics of Domestic Energy Independence panel, projects & energy transition partner Shariff Barakat will lead Opportunities in US Manufacturing: How Big, How Fast, How FEOC?, and counsel Taha Qureshi will guide the discussion on Cornerstones for Energy Independence: Investing in Grid Security & Cybersecurity.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

October 6, 2025

As of October 6, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) continues to operate despite the lapse in appropriations that resulted in a government shutdown on October 1, 2025. While FERC receives appropriations from Congress, it primarily is self-funded through fees and charges obtained from the industries it regulates, offsetting its total costs. Hence, during prior government shutdowns in 2018 and 2013, the agency was able to continue operations. However, FERC published a plan for operating in the event of a lapse in appropriations on September 30, 2025, available here

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

September 8, 2025

On September 4, 2025, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee convened a hearing to consider the nominations of Laura Swett and David LaCerte to serve as commissioners at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission). Swett is a former FERC Staff that served as legal and policy advisor to former FERC Chairman Kevin McIntyre and Commission Bernard McNamee. LaCerte is an attorney in private practice that previously held positions at the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board and the Louisiana Department of Veterans Affairs.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

September 9, 2025

On August 29, 2025, Christopher Wright, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) submitted a proposal to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) under section 403 of the Department of Energy Organization Act (DOE Organization Act), asking that FERC terminate its long-running proceeding in Docket No. PL18-1, which addresses proposed updates to its policy statement on the Certification of New Interstate Natural Gas Facilities. The docket resulted in a draft policy statement that has never been finalized, nor relied upon by FERC in a published order, but would require FERC to consider environmental impacts and potential mitigation prior to making a public interest determination under the Natural Gas Act (NGA). The Secretary asks FERC to rescind the draft policy statement in its entirety to remove any uncertainty in gas infrastructure development. Rescission would require FERC to initiate a new docket and develop a new record should it want to reinitiate similar policy changes in the future.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.