Deadline Approaching: SEC Seeks Industry Comments on Business and Financial Disclosure Requirements, Including Environmental and Climate Change Issues

Jun 8, 2016

Reading Time : 1 min

Pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, all publicly traded companies must provide investors with information to make informed investment and voting decisions. Regulation S-K was adopted in 1977 to foster uniform and integrated disclosure for registration statements and periodic and current reports under both acts. Since Regulation S-K’s adoption, the SEC has revised the disclosure requirements on numerous occasions, often expanding the requirements to ensure that investors have sufficient, material information for their investment and voting decisions.

For example, pursuant to Item 101(c)(1)(xii) of Regulation S-K, a registrant must disclose the material effects that compliance with environmental laws may have on its capital expenditures, earnings and competitive position, as well as any material estimated capital expenditures for the remainder of the fiscal year, the succeeding fiscal year and such future periods that the registrant deems material. In its Concept Release, the SEC solicits information about whether such environmental disclosure continues to be important to investors, whether such disclosure obligations should be increased or reduced, and whether the SEC should implement a specific format for this environmental disclosure. The Concept Release also seeks input on whether bright-line disclosure obligations, such as for environmental proceedings exceeding $100,000, should be utilized or whether a “materiality” standard is more appropriate.

The SEC’s Concept Release acknowledges increased attention to climate change issues, contemplating potential amendments and/or expansion of the existing disclosure obligations. First, recognizing that registrants’ risk profiles are constantly evolving, the SEC is trying to determine whether the risk factor disclosure obligations (Item 503(c)) remain effective in capturing emerging risks, such as climate change and arctic drilling-related risks. Second, since interest in environmental, social or governance disclosure is growing, the SEC seeks input on the importance of sustainability and other public policy issues to investors. Among other things, the SEC requests input on whether the existing disclosure requirements are sufficient to enable investors to evaluate climate change risk or whether increased climate change and sustainability disclosure requirements are needed.

The SEC’s Concept Release offers an excellent opportunity for interested parties to help shape the climate change-related disclosure requirements with which they will need to comply.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

June 23, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO) directing MISO and MISO transmission owners to show cause as to why MISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,212 (2026) (Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 23, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. directing PJM and PJM transmission owners to show cause as to why PJM’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 195 FERC ¶ 61,211 (2026) (the Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 22, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP) directing SPP and SPP transmission owners to show cause as to why SPP’s tariff should not be unjust and unreasonable (Southwest Power Pool, Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,213 (2026) (Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 18, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued show cause orders under section 206 of the Federal Power Act to PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM), Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO), Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP), California Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO), ISO New England Inc. (ISO-NE) and New York Independent System Operator, Inc. (NYISO), together with their transmission owners, directing each region to justify or reform the tariff provisions governing how data centers and other large loads connect to and receive service from the transmission grid. The orders are part of FERC’s broader response to rapidly increasing electricity demand, particularly from data centers and other large loads, and advance the objectives of the Secretary of Energy’s October 2025 Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANOPR) by seeking to accelerate “speed to power” while preserving grid reliability, affordability and consumer protections. 

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.