Among other things, the parties that requested the technical conference and extension of the comment period—whose motion garnered support from numerous market participants and trade groups—argued that the proposed rule “would create significant new reporting obligations for both market participants and market administrators alike,” which “would require gathering substantial information from entities that do not currently participate in a Commission-jurisdictional market and that are not otherwise subject to the Commission’s jurisdiction.”3 A technical conference, the requesting parties argued, would provide such entities an “opportunity to better understand key aspects of the proposed regulations and, ultimately, facilitate the submission of more meaningful comments.” In the November 10 order, FERC noted that it agrees that “a technical conference would be useful in understanding industry concerns and the extent of the burdens that would be imposed upon market participants” under the proposed rule.
1 Collection of Connected Entity Data from Regional Transmission Organizations & Indep. Sys. Operators, 153 FERC ¶ 61,162 (2015).
2 Collection of Connected Entity Data from Regional Transmission Organizations & Indep. Sys. Operators, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 152 FERC ¶ 61,219 (2015).
3 Maquarie Energy LLC, et al., Motion for Technical Conference and Request to Postpone Comment Deadline, FERC Docket No. RM15-23-000 (filed Oct. 28, 2015).
