Shale Developments U.S. vs. U.K.

May 28, 2013

Reading Time : 3 min

The boom in natural gas production has transformed the energy landscape in the U.S. and sent prices tumbling. The 10 percent increase in natural gas production between 2008 and 2011 means that concerns about scarcity of supply have been replaced by a debate on what to do with America’s “gas glut”. The abundance and low prices are forecast to cause gas to overtake oil as the largest share of the U.S. energy mix by 2030.

Cheap gas could be consumed domestically or sold internationally. New supply may be used as either a feedstock to encourage an American industrial renaissance or as a product to be exported to the rest of the world. The former promotes domestic manufacturing and jobs. The latter reduces the US’s balance of trade deficit. These are, of course, highly political issues and the outcome of this debate has yet to be decided.

For the U.K. government, these would be nice problems to have. The economy is sluggish and the fiscal deficit remains stubbornly high. Britain does not, however, currently produce shale gas in significant quantities. This may change. Until it does, there will not be the same policy and regulatory concerns. Last year the government concluded, based on advice of independent experts, that it was possible to mitigate the risk of undesirable seismic activity. This led to the lifting of a ban on fracking put in place after two earthquakes in 2011 near Blackpool, a seaside town, better known as a vacation destination than as the location of the U.K.’s largest shale gas reserves.

If you ask a Brit to visualize oil & gas production Blackpool would not be an image that comes to mind. For a start, production of onshore conventional oil & gas makes up merely 1 percent of the U.K.’s total output. Most of the population is not used to this type of activity taking place close to conurbations. Their closest proximity would likely to have been flying over the North Sea and seeing the flaring of natural gas. For those that have visited the city, they may think of Aberdeen – the often-called Energy Capital of Europe – which has an economy dominated by the oil & gas industry. Aberdeen is to Scotland what Houston is to the U.S. However, Aberdeen has thrived as a city servicing the offshore industry rather than being a place where production occurs.

With its new policy in place, is the U.K. about to witness its own shale gas boom? The U.K.’s finance ministers certainly hope so. It would create a new source of activity that could help jump start a slow economy. It would also produce additional tax revenue to assist in deficit-reduction programs. This would be a welcome development given that production from the North Sea (along with government revenue) is in terminal decline and onshore reserves of conventional petroleum are insignificant. Memories of the fiscal benefits that North Sea tax revenue previously gave to the predecessor governments remain fresh in the political memory.

Shale would also benefit Britain’s energy security. The U.K. – for many years, a net exporter of natural gas – became a net importer in 2004 and year-by-year becomes increasingly reliant on foreign suppliers. Gas prices are high and can, particularly during cold periods, be volatile.  

However, no one anticipates that U.K. shale production will achieve levels comparable to the US. With reserves estimated at 20 trillion cubic feet, the U.K. has just 2 percent of the U.S.’s estimated reserves and 11 percent of France or Poland’s.

What of individuals? Will millionaires be created overnight as they discover that their land overlays extractable resources? Unfortunately for those individuals, they will not receive a windfall. The U.S.’s ownership-in-place system allocates title to minerals to the landowner. In the U.K. – like most other countries in the world – the State claims exclusive rights to extract reserves and then licenses those rights to explorers. The landowner may, as a consequence, suffer some of the inconvenience of extraction – but without benefitting financially. This lack of reward for the landowner only encourages a debate framed by NIMBY concerns rather than a proper consideration of environmental or economic factors.      

The development of U.K. shale reserves may need to take into account another peculiarity of British politics. In 2015 Scotland will vote on independence from the U.K. The majority of current conventional production comes from fields off the coast of Aberdeen and the right to these resources is a key nationalist demand. After independence, these would fall within Scotland’s continental shelf. Many of these fields are old and in decline. In comparison, much of the U.K.’s potential shale gas is currently untapped and located in England. This may, in part, go a limited way to redressing the post-independence energy balance between the two countries. No one, however, is anticipating Blackpool becoming the next Aberdeen.

Share This Insight

Categories

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

June 25, 2025

On June 4–5, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) hosted a commissioner-led technical conference to discuss resource adequacy challenges facing regional transmission organizations and independent system operators (RTO). The conference is a response to the growing concern that multiple RTO regions across the country may not have sufficient supply available in the coming years to meet demand due to resource retirements, the pace of new generation entry and higher load growth arising from the construction of data centers and reindustrialization.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 12, 2025

We are pleased to share the presentation slide deck and a recording of Akin’s recently presented webinar, “Navigating U.S. Policy Shifts in the Critical Minerals Sector.”

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 10, 2025

On June 4, 2025, the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) announced revisions to its procedures for pipeline safety enforcement actions. The changes, outlined in two new policy memoranda from PHMSA’s Office of the Chief Counsel (PHC), aim to enhance due process protections for pipeline operators by clarifying how civil penalties are calculated and expanding the disclosure of agency records in enforcement proceedings.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

May 22, 2025

On May 19, 2025, the Department of Energy (DOE) finalized its 2024 LNG Export Study: Energy, Economic and Environmental Assessment of U.S. LNG Exports (the 2024 Study) through the release of a Response to Comments on the 2024 Study. The Response to Comments concludes that the 2024 Study, as augmented through public comments submitted on or before March 20, 2025, supporting a finding that liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports serve the public interest. With the comment process complete, DOE will move forward with final orders on pending applications to export LNG to non-free trade agreement (non-FTA) countries.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

May 20, 2025

On Thursday, May 15, the Senate Commerce, Science & Transportation Subcommittee on Surface Transportation, Freight, Pipelines and Safety held a hearing titled, “Pipeline Safety Reauthorization: Ensuring the Safe and Efficient Movement of American Energy.” The hearing examined legislative priorities for reauthorizing the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA).

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

April 15, 2025

On April 9, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order (EO)1 directing several federal agencies and subagencies that regulate energy, environmental, and conservation matters,2 including the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the Department of Energy (DOE), to establish conditional sunset dates for “regulations governing energy production.” The stated objective of the EO is to require agencies to periodically reexamine their regulations to ensure that they continue to serve the public good. For FERC, the order covers regulations promulgated under the Federal Power Act (FPA), the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act (FUA)3, as amended, while DOE must consider regulations promulgated under the Atomic Energy Act (AEA), the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act, the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct 1992), the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005) and the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), as amended (collectively the Covered Regulations).4 To the extent the DOE has been directed to promulgate regulations under various sections of the NGA, FPA and FUA, and FERC has been directed to promulgate regulations specific to the statutes attributed to the DOE in the EO, the EO is silent. The EO expressly does not apply to those “regulatory permitting regimes authorized by statute.”5

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

April 10, 2025

On April 8, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order (EO) directing the Department of Energy (DOE) to take steps to expand the use of its emergency authority under Federal Power Act (FPA) Section 202(c) to require the retention of generation resources deemed necessary to maintain resource adequacy within at risk-regions of the bulk power system regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).1 The EO appears to envision a more active role for DOE in overseeing and supporting the resource adequacy of the grid that deviates from the historic use of Section 202(c) and touches on issues at the intersection of state and federal authority over resource planning.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

March 10, 2025

On March 5, 2025, the United States Department of Energy (DOE) approved Golden Pass LNG Terminal LLC’s (GPLNG) request to extend a deadline to begin exporting liquefied natural gas (LNG) from its terminal facility currently under construction in Sabine Pass, Texas for 18 months, from September 30, 2025, to March 31, 2027 (the Order). The Order amends GPLNG’s two existing long-term orders authorizing the export of domestically produced LNG to countries with which the United States does and does not have free trade agreements (FTA).1  The Order does not amend the authorizations’ end date, which remains December 31, 2050. Under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), the DOE may authorize exports to non-FTA countries following completion of a “public interest” review, whereas exports to FTA countries are deemed to be in the public interest and the DOE is directed to issue authorizations without modification or delay.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.