SEC Set the Stage for Potential ESG Reporting Requirements

Feb 25, 2021

Reading Time : 2 min

The 2010 guidance summarized a number of SEC rules and regulations with the potential to be a source of disclosure obligations for public companies regarding climate change, including:

  • Disclosure regarding certain costs of complying with environmental laws (then under Regulation S-K Item 101(c)(1)(xii), now covered in Item 101(c)(2)(i))
  • Disclosure of certain environmental litigation (under Regulation S-K Item 103)
  • Disclosure of risk factors (then under Regulation S-K Item 503(c), now covered in Item 105)
  • Management’s Discussion and Analysis disclosures (under Regulation S-K Item 303).

When determining what climate-related disclosures they may have to make, the 2010 guidance urged companies to consider:

  • The potential impact of domestic legislation and regulation
  • International accords
  • Indirect consequences of regulation or business trends
  • Physical impacts of climate change.

While it is not yet apparent what changes will be made to the 2010 guidance or existing regulations, Lee’s statement suggests that she considers updated guidance to be an “immediate”—and perhaps just the first—step to eventual climate and other environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) disclosure requirements. Indeed, President Biden promised during his campaign to require public reporting companies to “disclose climate risk and the greenhouse gas emissions in their operations and supply chains.” Mandatory ESG reporting requirements may therefore be on the agenda for President Biden’s SEC chair nominee Gary Gensler, whose nomination we discussed further here, and the SEC’s new Senior Policy Advisor for Climate and ESG, Satyam Khanna, who we expect to work closely with Gensler, Lee and others at the SEC to implement President Biden’s promise. Accordingly, companies should remain vigilant for changes to their disclosure requirements as the SEC enhances its focus on climate-related issues. In the meantime, directors and officers may consider taking a step back to assess where their companies stand with regard to ESG issues and disclosure and to prepare for a future likely to bring greater scrutiny.

For greater detail on ESG issues that boards of directors should consider at this time, please see Akin Gump’s Top 10 Topics for Directors in 2021.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Sustainability

November 20, 2025

On November 18, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit issued an order enjoining the state of California from enforcing its climate-related financial risk reporting law, SB 261, while the Court hears full arguments on the merits. SB 261 requires covered entities (i.e., companies with over $500 million in annual global revenue who “do business in California”) to publish climate-related financial risk reports on their websites by January 1, 2026.1

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

November 13, 2025

On November 18, 2025, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) will host its third virtual workshop addressing regulations under SB 253 (Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act) and SB 261 (Climate-Related Financial Risk Act). The session follows CARB’s October 2025 decision to delay publishing draft regulations, which originally were slated for board consideration in December 2025.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

October 31, 2025

Despite litigation challenges and regulatory delays, deadlines are not shifting for reporting under California’s Climate Disclosure laws. Most recently, California Air Resources Board (CARB) delayed publishing draft regulations for SB 253 and SB 261, citing extensive public comments and ongoing input on covered entities. Despite the fact that CARB expects to publish an updated timeline for final regulations in early 2026, inaugural reporting under SB 261 is due by January 1, 2026.

...

Read More

Speaking Sustainability

October 2, 2025

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas entered a preliminary injunction against Texas Senate Bill 2337 (SB 2337) one day before the bill’s effective date. The bill would have regulated proxy advisory firms on their diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI)- and ESG-related investment recommendations and disclosures.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.