UK Supreme Court Rules AI is not an “Inventor” for Patent Purposes

December 20, 2023

United KingdomInternational

Summary

On December 20, 2023, the UK Supreme Court, ruled that an “inventor must be a person,” not an AI, for purposes of patent applications under the UK Patents Act of 1977. The ruling concerns an AI named DABUS, which its developer claimed autonomously created two products, a light beacon and a food or drink container, and thus deserved to be named as an inventor on their patents. The Court further found that the developer was not entitled to own any invention made by DABUS or to apply for a patent for inventions created by DABUS based on the developer’s ownership of the AI. The ruling affirms the earlier decision of the UK Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks.

Share This Page

Additional Information

Artificial Intelligence Resource Center

Giving you full access to the latest in AI across regulatory developments, legal & policy issues and industry news.

Akin Intelligence Newsletter

Subscribe to Akin Intelligence, our monthly newsletter recapping the latest in AI and its impact on various sectors. 

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.