California’s IoT Law to Take Effect January 1, 2020

December 12, 2019

Reading Time : 1 min

By: Rebecca Kocsis (Legal Project Analyst)

The law requires all connected devices sold or offered for sale in California to be equipped with “reasonable security” measures. The law defines “connected device” as “any device, or other physical object that is capable of connecting to the internet, directly or indirectly, and that is assigned an Internet Protocol address or Bluetooth address.” Such a device may include copy machines, printers, fax machines, televisions, Bluetooth headsets, keycard readers, “smart” light bulbs, personal fitness monitors, medical diagnostic equipment and a host of other devices.

In order to be complaint with the new law, IoT device manufacturers—including companies that contract with manufacturers—must equip each connected device with a “reasonable security feature or features” that are appropriate to the device’s nature and function; are appropriate to the information that the device may collect, contain or transmit; and that are designed to protect the device and information contained therein from unauthorized access, destruction, use, modification or disclosure. This requirement is presumed to be satisfied if the device is equipped with a “means for authentication outside a local area network” and comes with a preprogrammed unique password or “requires a user to generate a new means of authentication before access is granted to the device for the first time.”

The law does not provide a private right of action, and instead delegates enforcement to the California Attorney General (AG) and other local prosecutors. Unlike the CCPA, the IoT law grants city attorneys, county counsel and district attorneys the right to prosecute violations, along with the AG. This could open the possibility down the road of local prosecutors partnering with outside counsel to bring cases under the law. The law does not specify what types of penalties can be sought, what the maximum penalties are or whether the enforcement authorities must prove actual harm to consumers prior to seeking penalties.

Manufacturers should re-familiarize themselves with the law’s requirements in advance of the approaching January 1, 2020, implementation date and keep watch over developments in similar measures that are pending in other states.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Data Dive

March 3, 2025

On January 16, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a Final Rule updating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection (COPPA) Rule, significantly expanding compliance obligations for online services that collect, use, or disclose personal information from children under 13.1 The amendments impose new restrictions on targeted advertising, add data security requirements, refine parental consent mechanisms, and introduce additional compliance measures.

...

Read More

Data Dive

February 21, 2025

On January 8, 2025, the DOJ published a final rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).

...

Read More

Data Dive

January 22, 2025

On January 17, 2025, days before the inauguration, former President Joe Biden issued an executive order titled Strengthening and Promoting Innovation in the Nation's Cybersecurity (EO 14144). Building on previous efforts, including Executive Order 14028, this directive seeks to bolster cybersecurity across federal systems, supply chains and critical infrastructure from adversarial nations, particularly from the People’s Republic of China (PRC).

...

Read More

Data Dive

January 10, 2025

UPDATE: The California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) has extended the deadline for submitting public comments from January 14 to February 19, 2025, in response to the recent California wildfires. This extension aims to afford stakeholders additional time to provide comprehensive and detailed feedback, considering the significant challenges posed by the wildfires.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 25, 2024

Treasury has issued a Final Rule to implement President Biden’s 2023 EO targeting U.S. investments in Chinese companies engaged in certain activities related to semiconductors, quantum computing or AI.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 19, 2024

The European Union’s AI Office published the inaugural General-Purpose AI Code of Practice on November 14, 2024. The Code is intended to assist providers of AI models in their preparations for compliance with the forthcoming EU AI Act, to be enforced from August 2, 2025. The Code is designed to be both forward-thinking and globally applicable, addressing the areas of transparency, risk evaluation, technical safeguards and governance. While adherence to the Code is not mandatory, it is anticipated to serve as a means of demonstrating compliance with the obligations under the EU AI Act. Following a consultation period that garnered approximately 430 responses, the AI Office will be empowered to apply these rules, with penalties for nonconformity potentially reaching 3% of worldwide turnover or €15 million. Three additional iterations of the Code are anticipated to be produced within the coming five months.

...

Read More

Data Dive

November 15, 2024

On October 29, 2024, the DOJ issued a proposed rule prohibiting and restricting certain transactions that could allow persons from countries of concern, such as China, access to bulk sensitive personal data of U.S. citizens or to U.S. government-related data (regardless of volume).

...

Read More

Data Dive

October 17, 2024

During the course of any lending transaction, lenders will conduct a due diligence review of the borrower, including reviewing any relevant “know-your-customer” information.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.