Chinese Film Market: 2015 in Review

Dec 7, 2015

Reading Time : 2 min

Analysis of American Films in China

Now that the 2015 slate of American films has been set, we have taken a look at the American films that have successfully made it into the Chinese market to see if there are any trends or earmarks for success. Below we have compiled data on the 32 American films that made the cut. The data breaks down the films by genre,1 critical review,2 studio, Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) rating, and whether it is a sequel or part of a lager cinematic universe.

The Results

While there is no magic formula for entrance into the Chinese market, the following characteristics suggest that a film may be more successful in its bid:

Genre: Action and adventure/science fiction

Critics’ Ratings: No clear correlations

Studio: 20th Century Fox and Walt Disney

MPAA Ratings: PG-13

Sequel or Part of a Larger Cinematic Universe: Yes

Action and adventure/science fiction films topped the list for the most represented genre. This popularity makes sense because this genre provides escapism, showcases large visual effects and plays into the current superhero trend. 

Surprisingly, the number of comedic films increased from 2014.  Last year, comedic films accounted for three of 30 American films released in China. This year, they accounted for six of 32. It is unlikely that this trend will continue, and more likely that these films were admitted in spite of their comedic value rather than because of it. Generally, comedies have trouble overseas due to the difficult translation of jokes and/or of the cultural experience.

One trend to note is that the number of films that are sequels or part of a larger cinematic universe is growing. Last year, this category accounted for 13 out of 30 American films released in China. This year, it accounts for 16 out of 32. This is partially the result of a larger trend in Hollywood to build off of successful film franchises and Marvel’s bid to create a pantheon of superheroes. They may be gaining traction in the Chinese market for any number of reasons: the shifting sample size, tendency to fall into the popular action and adventure/science fiction category, or solidified relationships with particular studios.

Until we get more information for the 2016 slate, buy some popcorn and settle in.


1 Please note that some films fall into multiple categories. If a film fell into multiple genres, both genres were taken into account for the purposes of this post. 

2 Based on Rotten Tomatoes compilation of critical reviews.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

June 27, 2024

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published five new Form 8-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) expanding the agency’s interpretations of cybersecurity incident disclosures pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. In July 2023, the SEC adopted final rules with respect to cybersecurity incidents that generally require public companies to disclose (i) material cybersecurity incidents within four business days after determining the incident was material and (ii) material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance on an annual basis. We wrote about the final cybersecurity disclosure rules here.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 12, 2024

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted final rules (available here; also see the fact sheet and press release) representing significant changes to  special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), shell companies and the disclosure of projections. These rules aim to enhance disclosures, protect investors and align the regulatory framework for SPACs with traditional IPOs. The following summarizes the key aspects of these rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

October 4, 2023

On September 20, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule amending the so-called “Names Rule” (found here) that is “designed to modernize and enhance” protections under Rule 35d-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The final rule is part of the SEC’s holistic efforts to regulate environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, and is the SEC’s latest attempt to curb greenwashing in U.S. capital markets. The amendments require registered investment funds that include ESG factors in their names to place 80% of their assets in investments corresponding to those factors, thereby extending to ESG funds the SEC’s long-standing approach of regulating the names of registered funds to ensure they are marketed to investors truthfully. Fund complexes with more than $1 billion in assets will have two years from the final rule’s effective date (60 days after publication in the Federal Register) to comply, while fund complexes with less than $1 billion in assets will be given a compliance period of 30 months.

Chair Gary Gensler said “[t]he Names Rule reflects a basic idea: A fund’s investment portfolio should match a fund’s advertised investment focus. In essence, if a fund’s name suggests an investment focus, the fund in turn needs to invest shareholders’ dollars in a manner consistent with that investment focus. Otherwise, a fund’s portfolio might be inconsistent with what fund investors desired when selecting a fund based upon its name.” The sole dissenting vote against the rule modification, Commissioner Mark Uyeda, said “[w]ith these amendments, the Commission overemphasizes the importance of a fund’s name, as if to suggest that investors and their financial professionals need not look at the prospectus disclosures.” Commissioner Uyeda also expressed concern that fund investors will bear the increased compliance costs associated with the rule change.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 31, 2023

As discussed in our prior publication (found here), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments on December 14, 2022, regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. On May 25, 2023, the SEC issued three new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) relating to the Rule 10b5-1 amendments.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.