1. Insights
  2. Blogs
  3. Deal Diary

Corp Fin Publishes New C&DIs Clarifying Inline XBRL Rules

Aug 23, 2019

Reading Time : 4 min

By: Garrett A. DeVries

Background

eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL), the open international standard for digital business reporting, is a global framework for exchanging business information. XBRL was developed to improve the way in which financial data is communicated and accomplishes this goal by using “tags” to identify (or make interactive) each piece of financial data. Once tagged, available software is able to easily analyze such data without extensive and burdensome manual processing. As noted by the SEC, this efficiency allows investors, analysts and regulators to access and manipulate data in one disclosure, to compare disclosures across registrants and to make comparisons against previous disclosures from the same registrant. On January 30, 2009, the SEC adopted rules requiring filers, on a phased-in basis, to provide the financial statement information included in registration statements and periodic and current reports in the XBRL format by submitting it in the exhibits to such filings.

Inline XBRL is a format that allows SEC filers to embed XBRL data directly into their filing document and precludes the need to create a separate filing exhibit containing such data. On June 28, 2018, the SEC adopted rules requiring filers, on a phased-in basis, to submit financial statement information (referred to hereafter as “Interactive Data Files”) in the Inline XBRL format. For large accelerated filers, the use of the Inline XBRL format became a requirement beginning with their first Form 10-Q for fiscal periods ending on or after June 15, 2019.

The cover page of any SEC form (e.g., Form 10-K) contains a number of data points, known as document and entity identifier elements, such as form type, company name, filer size, public float, the exchange on which securities are registered and the state (or jurisdiction) of incorporation. Historically, many of such data points have not been required to be tagged in XBRL and none have been required to be tagged in Inline XBRL. On March 20, 2019, the SEC adopted rules requiring filers, on a phased-in basis, to tag in Inline XBRL all of the information on the cover pages of Form 10-K, Form 10-Q, Form 8-K, Form 20-F and Form 40-F. For large accelerated filers, cover page data tagging became a requirement beginning with their first Form 10-Q for fiscal periods ending on or after June 15, 2019.

Summary of New C&DIs

Question 101.01 (Identifying Interactive Data Files in the Exhibit Index)

Companies subject to Inline XBRL requirements should identify Interactive Data Files as exhibit 101 in the exhibit index and any Cover Page Interactive Data File as exhibit 104 in the exhibit index. The exhibit index should include the word “Inline” within the title description for any exhibit using Inline XBRL. Additionally, exhibit 104 in the exhibit index should cross-reference to the Interactive Data Files submitted under exhibit 101.

Question 101.02 (Voluntary Inline XBRL Filers Not Required to Comply with Cover Page Tagging Requirements)

A company that voluntarily submits Interactive Data Files in the Inline XBRL format prior to its applicable phase-in date is not required to comply with the cover page data tagging requirements for those filings.

Question 101.03 (All 8-Ks Subject to Cover Page Tagging)

For companies subject to Inline XBRL requirements, the cover pages of all Form 8-Ks, not just those that contain financial statements, are required to be tagged with XBRL data.

Question 101.04 (When Exhibit 104 Would be the Only Exhibit Required in a Form 8-K)

Cover Page Interactive Data Files should be identified as exhibit 104 in the exhibit index of any applicable filing. If, however, the exhibit index of a Form 8-K would include only a Cover Page Interactive Data File listed as exhibit 104, the company may omit the exhibit index.

Question 101.05 (Differing Company Name)

Where a company’s name, as it appears on the cover page of a form, differs from its conformed name in the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval (EDGAR) system, it is permissible for the Inline XBRL tagged company name shown on the cover page of a filing to vary from the EDGAR conformed name and will not generally prevent the filing from being accepted and disseminated. In rare cases, the variation may result in a notice of suspension, in which case the company should contact EDGAR Filer Technical Support.

Question 101.06 (Ability to Cease Voluntary Submissions Prior to Phase-in Date)

If a company voluntarily submits Interactive Data Files in the Inline XBRL format prior to its applicable phase-in date, the company can later cease such voluntary submissions until they are required to submit Interactive Data Files in the Inline XBRL format under the phase-in schedule.

Question 101.07 (8-Ks Filed Before First 10-Q Subject to Inline XBRL Requirements)

When a company files a Form 8-K earlier on the same day as its first Form 10-Q for a fiscal period ending on or after the applicable Inline XBRL compliance date, the Form 8-K is not required to comply with Inline XBRL cover page tagging requirements.

Question 101.08 (Foreign Private Issuer Compliance)

Foreign private issuers are required to comply with the Inline XBRL requirements based on their filer status and basis of accounting.

  • Large accelerated filers, including foreign private issuers, that prepare their financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) will be required to comply beginning with fiscal periods ending on or after June 15, 2019.
  • Accelerated filers, including foreign private issuers, that prepare their financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP will be required to comply beginning with fiscal periods ending on or after June 15, 2020.
  • All other filers, including foreign private issuers that prepare their financial statements in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards, will be required to comply beginning with fiscal periods ending on or after June 15, 2021.

Question 101.09 (Form 20-F and 40-F Filers Compliance)

Since Form 20-F and 40-F filers do not have quarterly report filing obligations, they are required to comply with Inline XBRL beginning with the first filing on a form for which Inline XBRL is required for a fiscal period ending on or after the applicable compliance date.

Share This Insight

Categories

Corporate GovernancePolicy & RegulationCompliance

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

June 27, 2024

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published five new Form 8-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) expanding the agency’s interpretations of cybersecurity incident disclosures pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. In July 2023, the SEC adopted final rules with respect to cybersecurity incidents that generally require public companies to disclose (i) material cybersecurity incidents within four business days after determining the incident was material and (ii) material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance on an annual basis. We wrote about the final cybersecurity disclosure rules here.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 12, 2024

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted final rules (available here; also see the fact sheet and press release) representing significant changes to  special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), shell companies and the disclosure of projections. These rules aim to enhance disclosures, protect investors and align the regulatory framework for SPACs with traditional IPOs. The following summarizes the key aspects of these rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

October 4, 2023

On September 20, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule amending the so-called “Names Rule” (found here) that is “designed to modernize and enhance” protections under Rule 35d-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The final rule is part of the SEC’s holistic efforts to regulate environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, and is the SEC’s latest attempt to curb greenwashing in U.S. capital markets. The amendments require registered investment funds that include ESG factors in their names to place 80% of their assets in investments corresponding to those factors, thereby extending to ESG funds the SEC’s long-standing approach of regulating the names of registered funds to ensure they are marketed to investors truthfully. Fund complexes with more than $1 billion in assets will have two years from the final rule’s effective date (60 days after publication in the Federal Register) to comply, while fund complexes with less than $1 billion in assets will be given a compliance period of 30 months.

Chair Gary Gensler said “[t]he Names Rule reflects a basic idea: A fund’s investment portfolio should match a fund’s advertised investment focus. In essence, if a fund’s name suggests an investment focus, the fund in turn needs to invest shareholders’ dollars in a manner consistent with that investment focus. Otherwise, a fund’s portfolio might be inconsistent with what fund investors desired when selecting a fund based upon its name.” The sole dissenting vote against the rule modification, Commissioner Mark Uyeda, said “[w]ith these amendments, the Commission overemphasizes the importance of a fund’s name, as if to suggest that investors and their financial professionals need not look at the prospectus disclosures.” Commissioner Uyeda also expressed concern that fund investors will bear the increased compliance costs associated with the rule change.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 31, 2023

As discussed in our prior publication (found here), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments on December 14, 2022, regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. On May 25, 2023, the SEC issued three new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) relating to the Rule 10b5-1 amendments.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 24, 2023

On May 15, 2023, the Eastern District of California ruled that California Assembly Bill No. 979 (“AB 979”) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. As enacted, California’s Board Diversity Statute, required public companies with headquarters in the state to include a minimum number of directors from “underrepresented communities” or be subject to fines for violating the statute. AB 979 defines a “director from an underrepresented community” as “an individual who self-identifies as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Native, or who self-identifies as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.”

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 9, 2023

Update: On October 31, 2023, the Fifth Circuit granted the US Chamber of Commerce's petition for review of the SEC's share repurchase disclosure rules, holding that the SEC acted arbitrarily and capriciously in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The court directed the SEC to correct the defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 1, 2023, the SEC informed the Fifth Circuit that it was unable to correct the rule's defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 19, 2023, the Fifth Circuit vacated the SEC’s share repurchase disclosure rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

April 12, 2023

We have released our 2023 ESG Survey which includes a collection of reports reflecting on significant ESG themes and trends from 2022, as well as what we believe to be key developments for 2023.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 6, 2023

As companies begin preparing for the 2023 proxy season, we note that Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) and Glass Lewis, the leading providers of corporate governance solutions and proxy advisory services, issued updated benchmark policies (proxy voting guidelines), which can be found here and here, respectively. The updated proxy voting guidelines generally focus on board accountability and oversight considerations and address topics such as climate accountability, board diversity, shareholder rights, corporate governance standards, executive compensation and social issues. What follows is a summary of the proxy voting guidelines published by ISS and Glass Lewis for the 2023 proxy season.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.