Final Regulations on MLP Qualifying Income Provide Clarification

Feb 2, 2017

Reading Time : 3 min

Exclusive List of Qualifying Activities Abandoned

The proposed regulations originally contained a very limited “exclusive list” of operations that can qualify as Section 7704(d)(1)(E) core activities, which did not address many operations on which the IRS had previously issued favorable rulings. The final regulations abandon this narrow approach and instead provide a general definition for each of the core activities. In addition, the final regulations address many areas that were left out by the proposed regulations, including compression services to a pipeline; liquefying and regasifying natural gas; sales of renewable identification numbers; retail sale of propane; cost reimbursement in connection with a qualifying activity; income from passive interests in oil and gas properties, such as royalties, net profits interests and lease bonus payments; and blending and additization of qualifying products. The IRS expects this to tremendously decrease the number of private letter rulings requests that it receives in this area.

Processing and Refining Separately Defined

The proposed regulations combined the definition of processing and refining, and required a taxpayer to use a consistent MACRS class life for the assets used in the activity. The proposed regulations also prohibited any substantial physical or chemical change during the processing or refining stage. These requirements were perceived by the industry as arbitrary, and the IRS retracted from those positions. The final regulations separately define processing and refining in order to better clarify which activities generate qualifying income. Importantly, for purposes of the “refining” definition, the final regulations considered the information provided by the U.S. Energy Information Administration in adopting 35 qualifying products that are typically produced in a refinery or natural gas processing plant. Lastly, the final regulations dropped the physical/chemical change limitation and dispensed with the MACRS requirement.

Propylene and Ethylene Qualify

The proposed regulations treated olefins, such as propylene, ethylene and butylene, produced from natural gas processing as nonqualifying while the same products produced from the processing of crude oil and related fuels were treated as qualifying. This approach was sharply criticized for lack of judicial and legislative support, especially given the fact that the IRS had previously issued a favorable ruling to the contrary. The final regulations abandon this approach and treat olefins produced, whether from natural gas or crude oil, as qualifying products.

Water Services Rule Relaxed

The proposed regulations allowed noncore Section 7704(d)(1)(E) activities to nonetheless be treated as qualifying activities if the activities themselves are intrinsic activities. Under the requirements of the proposed regulations, a provider of water or other injectant used in oil and gas exploration would also have to collect, clean, recycle, or otherwise treat the water or injectants on a strict “well-by-well” basis. The final regulations relax this standard by requiring only that the provider be in the business of collecting, cleaning, recycling or otherwise disposing of injectants within the same geographic area.

Transition Period

The final regulations apply to income earned by a partnership in a taxable year that begins on or after January 19, 2017, but also include a 10-year transition for partnerships that do not meet the requirements under the final regulation. A partnership is eligible for the transition period if it (i) has received a private letter ruling from the IRS holding that an activity is qualifying income; (ii) has been engaged in an activity prior to May 6, 2015, and has reasonably treated the activity as giving rise to qualifying income under the statute as interpreted prior to May 6, 2015; (iii) has entered into a binding agreement for construction of assets to be used in an activity that would give rise to qualifying income under the statute as reasonably interpreted prior to May 6, 2015; or (iv) engaged in an activity after May 6, 2015, but before January 19, 2017, and the income from that activity was qualifying income under the proposed regulations. A technical termination under Section 708(b)(1)(B) will not terminate the 10-year transition period.

Action Items

We expect any uncertainty surrounding the effectiveness of the final regulations to be resolved soon by the new administration. Meanwhile, MLPs and other investors considering the MLP tax structure should carefully review their existing operations and activities to ensure that they meet the standards promulgated by the final regulations.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

June 27, 2024

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published five new Form 8-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) expanding the agency’s interpretations of cybersecurity incident disclosures pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. In July 2023, the SEC adopted final rules with respect to cybersecurity incidents that generally require public companies to disclose (i) material cybersecurity incidents within four business days after determining the incident was material and (ii) material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance on an annual basis. We wrote about the final cybersecurity disclosure rules here.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 12, 2024

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted final rules (available here; also see the fact sheet and press release) representing significant changes to  special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), shell companies and the disclosure of projections. These rules aim to enhance disclosures, protect investors and align the regulatory framework for SPACs with traditional IPOs. The following summarizes the key aspects of these rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

October 4, 2023

On September 20, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule amending the so-called “Names Rule” (found here) that is “designed to modernize and enhance” protections under Rule 35d-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The final rule is part of the SEC’s holistic efforts to regulate environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, and is the SEC’s latest attempt to curb greenwashing in U.S. capital markets. The amendments require registered investment funds that include ESG factors in their names to place 80% of their assets in investments corresponding to those factors, thereby extending to ESG funds the SEC’s long-standing approach of regulating the names of registered funds to ensure they are marketed to investors truthfully. Fund complexes with more than $1 billion in assets will have two years from the final rule’s effective date (60 days after publication in the Federal Register) to comply, while fund complexes with less than $1 billion in assets will be given a compliance period of 30 months.

Chair Gary Gensler said “[t]he Names Rule reflects a basic idea: A fund’s investment portfolio should match a fund’s advertised investment focus. In essence, if a fund’s name suggests an investment focus, the fund in turn needs to invest shareholders’ dollars in a manner consistent with that investment focus. Otherwise, a fund’s portfolio might be inconsistent with what fund investors desired when selecting a fund based upon its name.” The sole dissenting vote against the rule modification, Commissioner Mark Uyeda, said “[w]ith these amendments, the Commission overemphasizes the importance of a fund’s name, as if to suggest that investors and their financial professionals need not look at the prospectus disclosures.” Commissioner Uyeda also expressed concern that fund investors will bear the increased compliance costs associated with the rule change.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 31, 2023

As discussed in our prior publication (found here), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments on December 14, 2022, regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. On May 25, 2023, the SEC issued three new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) relating to the Rule 10b5-1 amendments.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.