House Energy & Commerce Subcommittee Holds Hearing on Data Security

Feb 6, 2014

Reading Time : 2 min

By: Francine E. Friedman, Matthew C. Thomas (Senior Public Policy Specialist)

During the second panel, witnesses from Target and Neiman Marcus reprised their testimony from the previous Senate hearing, again offering apologies to their customers and explaining their role in the breach investigations and the measures they have taken to remedy potential harm to their customers. Bob Russo of PCI Security Standards discussed the work his firm has done to improve payment card data security around the globe, while Phillip Smith from Trustwave described his firm’s experience in consulting on data security for other companies.

As in the previous Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, government witnesses, as well as the retailer witnesses, faced a large amount of scrutiny regarding the recent data breaches, including when they were discovered, how the breaches were carried out and the results of the current investigations. In general, members of the Subcommittee agreed that the United States is facing a rising tide of malicious cyber attacks and that the federal government must work together with states and private industry to develop better protections against data theft. Many of the witnesses supported a federal standard for data security and breach notification, so long as the standard is developed through a stakeholder process and provides sufficient flexibility to adapt to ever-changing technology. Republican members of the Subcommittee, in particular Chairman Lee Terry (R-NE), took this sentiment further, arguing that private industry (rather than the federal government) should take the lead in developing best practices, which could then be adopted into a national standard.

On February 6, the Obama Administration announced it has invited privacy and civil liberties groups to meet at the White House for an “informal conversation to discuss issues at the intersection of Big Data and Privacy” and an opportunity to “help frame the efforts” of the Big Data review President Obama announced during a speech on proposed reforms to the nation’s surveillance practices.

Despite the recent focus on data security, several other priorities hold Congress’s immediate attention, including raising of the debt ceiling, finalization of a budget agreement and immigration reform. While it is possible that additional hearings or mark-ups of recently introduced legislation will be held, they have yet to be scheduled. Many of the legislative data security proposals vary from committee to committee, so it is unclear whether a bipartisan bicameral consensus can be reached in this Congress.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

June 27, 2024

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published five new Form 8-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) expanding the agency’s interpretations of cybersecurity incident disclosures pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. In July 2023, the SEC adopted final rules with respect to cybersecurity incidents that generally require public companies to disclose (i) material cybersecurity incidents within four business days after determining the incident was material and (ii) material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance on an annual basis. We wrote about the final cybersecurity disclosure rules here.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 12, 2024

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted final rules (available here; also see the fact sheet and press release) representing significant changes to  special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), shell companies and the disclosure of projections. These rules aim to enhance disclosures, protect investors and align the regulatory framework for SPACs with traditional IPOs. The following summarizes the key aspects of these rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

October 4, 2023

On September 20, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule amending the so-called “Names Rule” (found here) that is “designed to modernize and enhance” protections under Rule 35d-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The final rule is part of the SEC’s holistic efforts to regulate environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, and is the SEC’s latest attempt to curb greenwashing in U.S. capital markets. The amendments require registered investment funds that include ESG factors in their names to place 80% of their assets in investments corresponding to those factors, thereby extending to ESG funds the SEC’s long-standing approach of regulating the names of registered funds to ensure they are marketed to investors truthfully. Fund complexes with more than $1 billion in assets will have two years from the final rule’s effective date (60 days after publication in the Federal Register) to comply, while fund complexes with less than $1 billion in assets will be given a compliance period of 30 months.

Chair Gary Gensler said “[t]he Names Rule reflects a basic idea: A fund’s investment portfolio should match a fund’s advertised investment focus. In essence, if a fund’s name suggests an investment focus, the fund in turn needs to invest shareholders’ dollars in a manner consistent with that investment focus. Otherwise, a fund’s portfolio might be inconsistent with what fund investors desired when selecting a fund based upon its name.” The sole dissenting vote against the rule modification, Commissioner Mark Uyeda, said “[w]ith these amendments, the Commission overemphasizes the importance of a fund’s name, as if to suggest that investors and their financial professionals need not look at the prospectus disclosures.” Commissioner Uyeda also expressed concern that fund investors will bear the increased compliance costs associated with the rule change.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 31, 2023

As discussed in our prior publication (found here), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments on December 14, 2022, regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. On May 25, 2023, the SEC issued three new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) relating to the Rule 10b5-1 amendments.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.