Obama Administration Further Eases Sanctions in Advance of Cuba Visit

Mar 17, 2016

Reading Time : 5 min

Notwithstanding these latest changes, however, the U.S. embargo against Cuba continues to broadly restrict trade, transactions and travel between the two countries, absent general or specific authorization by OFAC and/or BIS. Moreover, OFAC continues to penalize companies for violating these rules.

Overview of Amendments

Banking and Financial Services

OFAC now generally authorizes U.S. banking institutions to process “U-turn” transactions in which Cuba or a Cuban national has an interest. This important change allows Cuban funds originating from a non-U.S. bank to be cleared through U.S. banks and transferred back to a non-U.S. bank. Under this new authorization, neither the originator nor the beneficiary of the transaction can be a person subject to U.S. jurisdiction, unless otherwise authorized or exempt under the regulations.

Additionally, U.S. banks can now process U.S. dollar monetary instruments (e.g., cash and traveler’s checks) that are presented indirectly by Cuban financial institutions. OFAC has also authorized U.S. banks to open correspondent accounts denominated in U.S. dollars at Cuban financial institutions to facilitate these authorized transactions. However, Cuban banks are not generally authorized to open correspondent accounts with banks subject to U.S. jurisdiction.

Finally, U.S. banks can also now open and maintain accounts in the United States for Cuban nationals located in Cuba for the purposes of receiving payments in the United States for authorized or exempt transactions under the CACR and to remit such payments back to Cuba.

Business Presence in Cuba

OFAC has expanded its authorization for certain types of companies subject to U.S. jurisdiction to establish and maintain a business presence in Cuba. Now, in addition to establishing and maintaining a physical presence in Cuba, exporters of authorized or exempt goods, entities providing mail or parcel transmission services or cargo transportation services, and providers of carrier and travel services are able to establish a business presence (such as a joint venture or franchise with a Cuban individual or entity) in Cuba to facilitate authorized transactions. This authorization expands upon that previously granted for providers of telecommunications and Internet-based services in September 2015. Furthermore, exporters and re-exporters of authorized or exempt goods may now also assemble such goods in Cuba.

Physical Presence in Cuba

OFAC has authorized entities that engage in authorized humanitarian projects, entities that engage in noncommercial activities intended to provide support for the Cuban people, and private foundations or research educational institutes that engage in certain authorized activities to establish a “physical presence” (such as an office, retail outlet or warehouse) in Cuba. In a related action, BIS revised License Exception SCP to authorize the export or re-export to Cuba of EAR99 items and items controlled for antiterrorism reasons for use by persons authorized by OFAC to establish and maintain a physical or business presence in Cuba.

Shipping

BIS amended License Exception Aircraft, Vessels, and Spacecraft (AVS) to generally authorize the transit through Cuban territory of cargo laden aboard a vessel on temporary sojourn to Cuba that is destined for other countries. Previously, exporters that wanted to ship authorized cargo bound for Cuba along with cargo bound for other destinations had to obtain a specific license from BIS to authorize the non-Cuba cargo to transit Cuba. For shippers to make use of this change, the cargo must depart with the vessel at the end of its temporary sojourn, and it cannot enter the Cuban economy or be transferred to another vessel while in Cuba. In addition, BIS notes that Coast Guard regulations may continue to impose restrictions on entry into Cuban territorial waters.

Cuban Employees in the United States

OFAC now authorizes all transactions related to the sponsorship or hiring of a Cuban national to work in the United States, provided that employers do not make additional payments to the Cuban government in relation to such sponsorship or hiring. Cuban nationals in the United States may now receive any salary or other compensation consistent with the individual’s nonimmigrant status or other nonimmigrant travel authorization. OFAC also removed restrictions that limited Cuban nationals hired legally in the United States from earning salaries or stipends in excess of basic living and personal consumption expenses.

Travel

Expanding on the travel authorizations that have been issued over the past year, OFAC has amended the “people-to-people” General License to authorize U.S. persons to travel to Cuba independently for educational exchanges without having to travel under the auspices of a sponsoring organization. U.S. persons traveling under this General License must maintain a full-time schedule of activities intended to enhance contact with the Cuban people and may not travel to Cuba for tourism purposes. U.S. persons traveling pursuant to this General License must also retain related records for five years that demonstrate a full-time schedule of authorized activities.

Related to the expanded travel authorizations, persons who are subject to U.S. jurisdiction and are located in a third country may now purchase or acquire Cuban-origin goods for personal consumption while in the third country, as well as receive or obtain any services from Cuba or a Cuban national that are ordinarily incident to travel within a third country. However, this provision does not authorize the importation of such merchandise into the United States, including as accompanied baggage.

Significance of Changes

The latest amendments lift significant sanctions restrictions, advancing the Obama administration’s efforts to normalize relations with Cuba while expanding opportunities for U.S. individuals and companies to engage with Cuba. OFAC has broadened the scope of companies that may establish a business presence in Cuba, making it more practical and achievable for certain U.S. companies to pursue business opportunities in Cuba. These changes will also significantly expand Cuban nationals’ access to U.S. financial institutions by permitting “U-turn” transactions through the U.S. financial system and allowing U.S. banking institutions to process U.S. dollar monetary instruments that are presented indirectly by Cuban financial institutions. Furthermore, the expansion of License Exception AVS to authorize cargo to transit Cuba to reach third-country destinations allows companies to make more efficient use of their vessels for cargo delivery and allows exporters to select more efficient shipping routes. Finally, the expansion of the General License for individual people-to-people educational travel will make it less cumbersome and expensive for U.S. persons to engage in authorized travel to Cuba to engage with the Cuban people for nontourism purposes.

Notwithstanding these changes, OFAC continues to actively enforce the CACR, as evidenced by recent enforcement actions against CGG Services S.A. on February 22, 2016, and Halliburton Atlantic Limited on February 25, 2016. Likewise, the comprehensive U.S. embargo against Cuba remains codified in statute and can be reversed by only an act of Congress. Specific limitations that are codified in statute, such as provisions restricting U.S. financial institutions’ financing of U.S. agricultural exports to Cuba, will also remain in effect absent legislative action. While there appears to be growing consensus on Capitol Hill to consider legislation to address the established legal framework of U.S. sanctions on Cuba, it remains unclear when such action will be politically feasible. Accordingly, U.S. persons and foreign companies owned or controlled by U.S. persons remain subject to core provisions of the U.S. sanctions regime that generally bar investment in, or trade with, Cuba, except as authorized by OFAC and/or BIS.

We will continue to monitor developments as they unfold, and we encourage clients to contact us to learn more about how these changes impact specific business operations and opportunities.

*This blog post was originally on AG Trade Law.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

June 27, 2024

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published five new Form 8-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs)
expanding the agency’s interpretations of cybersecurity incident disclosures pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. In July 2023, the SEC adopted final rules with
respect to cybersecurity incidents that generally require public companies to disclose (i) material cybersecurity incidents within four business days after
determining the incident was material and (ii) material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance on an annual
basis. We wrote about the final cybersecurity disclosure rules here.
...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 12, 2024

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted final rules (available here; also see the fact sheet and press release) representing
significant changes to  special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), shell companies and the disclosure of projections. These rules aim to enhance
disclosures, protect investors and align the regulatory framework for SPACs with traditional IPOs. The following summarizes the key aspects of these rules.
...

Read More

Deal Diary

October 4, 2023

On September 20, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule amending the so-called “Names Rule” (found here) that is
“designed to modernize and enhance” protections under Rule 35d-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The final rule is part of the SEC’s holistic efforts
to regulate environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, and is the SEC’s latest attempt to curb greenwashing in U.S. capital markets. The
amendments require registered investment funds that include ESG factors in their names to place 80% of their assets in investments corresponding to those
factors, thereby extending to ESG funds the SEC’s long-standing approach of regulating the names of registered funds to ensure they are marketed to
investors truthfully. Fund complexes with more than $1 billion in assets will have two years from the final rule’s effective date (60 days after publication in the
Federal Register) to comply, while fund complexes with less than $1 billion in assets will be given a compliance period of 30 months. ...
...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 31, 2023

As discussed in our prior publication (found here), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments on December 14, 2022, regarding
Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. On May 25, 2023, the SEC issued three new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs)
relating to the Rule 10b5-1 amendments.
...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 24, 2023

On May 15, 2023, the Eastern District of California ruled that California Assembly Bill No. 979 (“AB 979”) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S.
Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. As enacted, California’s Board Diversity Statute, required public companies with headquarters in
the state to include a minimum number of directors from “underrepresented communities” or be subject to fines for violating the statute. AB 979 defines a
“director from an underrepresented community” as “an individual who self-identifies as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander,
Native American, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Native, or who self-identifies as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.”
...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 9, 2023

Update: On October 31, 2023, the Fifth Circuit granted the US Chamber of Commerce's petition for review of the SEC's share repurchase disclosure rules,
holding that the SEC acted arbitrarily and capriciously in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The court directed the SEC to correct the defects
within 30 days of the opinion. On December 1, 2023, the SEC informed the Fifth Circuit that it was unable to correct the rule's defects within 30 days of the
opinion. On December 19, 2023, the Fifth Circuit vacated the SEC’s share repurchase disclosure rules.
...

Read More

Deal Diary

April 12, 2023

We have released our 2023 ESG Survey which includes a collection of reports reflecting on significant ESG themes and trends from 2022, as well as what we
believe to be key developments for 2023.
...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 6, 2023

As companies begin preparing for the 2023 proxy season, we note that Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) and Glass Lewis, the leading providers of
corporate governance solutions and proxy advisory services, issued updated benchmark policies (proxy voting guidelines), which can be found here and here,
respectively. The updated proxy voting guidelines generally focus on board accountability and oversight considerations and address topics such as climate
accountability, board diversity, shareholder rights, corporate governance standards, executive compensation and social issues. What follows is a summary of
the proxy voting guidelines published by ISS and Glass Lewis for the 2023 proxy season.
...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.