Obama Administration’s New Labor Rule May Impact Corporate Political Action Committees

May 24, 2016

Reading Time : 1 min

By: Melissa L. Laurenza, Samuel J. Olswanger, Hayley Evans, Public Policy Specialist & Nathan Stern, Public Policy Specialist

The Federal Election Campaign Act and Federal Election Commission regulations govern who may be solicited by corporate PACs. Employees who qualify as the “restricted class” may be solicited at any time, and the FLSA provides guidance in determining whether individuals have the requisite job responsibilities to be included.  

Members of a corporation’s “restricted class” generally include the following:

  • the company’s salaried executives and administrative personnel, who exercise policymaking, managerial, professional or supervisory responsibilities
  • salaried employees who follow recognized professions (i.e., attorneys, engineers)
  • shareholders
  • compensated members of the board
  • the families of these individuals.

While the FLSA regulations are not used to determine the definition of the solicitable class of employees, the FLSA serves as a guideline to determine whether an individual possesses policymaking, managerial, professional or supervisory responsibilities. Traditionally, corporations have not included nonexempt employees in the “restricted class” because overtime-eligible employees generally do not exercise policymaking, managerial, professional or supervisory responsibilities. If corporations continue to consider nonexempt employees as being outside the “restricted class,” the new DOL rule may reduce the number of employees who can be solicited for the PAC.

Additionally, some corporations may respond to the new DOL rule by converting affected employees from “salaried” to “hourly” compensation. As noted above, in order to be considered part of a corporation’s “restricted class,” an employee must be paid on a salaried basis. Any conversion to hourly status, regardless of the employee’s responsibilities, will preclude solicitations for contributions to the PAC from those employees.

In light of the new DOL rule, corporations should review their “restricted class” to ensure that they are complying with federal campaign finance laws, keeping in mind that employees must be paid on a salaried basis and exercise certain responsibilities to be solicited for the corporate PAC.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

June 27, 2024

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published five new Form 8-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) expanding the agency’s interpretations of cybersecurity incident disclosures pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. In July 2023, the SEC adopted final rules with respect to cybersecurity incidents that generally require public companies to disclose (i) material cybersecurity incidents within four business days after determining the incident was material and (ii) material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance on an annual basis. We wrote about the final cybersecurity disclosure rules here.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 12, 2024

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted final rules (available here; also see the fact sheet and press release) representing significant changes to  special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), shell companies and the disclosure of projections. These rules aim to enhance disclosures, protect investors and align the regulatory framework for SPACs with traditional IPOs. The following summarizes the key aspects of these rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

October 4, 2023

On September 20, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule amending the so-called “Names Rule” (found here) that is “designed to modernize and enhance” protections under Rule 35d-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The final rule is part of the SEC’s holistic efforts to regulate environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, and is the SEC’s latest attempt to curb greenwashing in U.S. capital markets. The amendments require registered investment funds that include ESG factors in their names to place 80% of their assets in investments corresponding to those factors, thereby extending to ESG funds the SEC’s long-standing approach of regulating the names of registered funds to ensure they are marketed to investors truthfully. Fund complexes with more than $1 billion in assets will have two years from the final rule’s effective date (60 days after publication in the Federal Register) to comply, while fund complexes with less than $1 billion in assets will be given a compliance period of 30 months.

Chair Gary Gensler said “[t]he Names Rule reflects a basic idea: A fund’s investment portfolio should match a fund’s advertised investment focus. In essence, if a fund’s name suggests an investment focus, the fund in turn needs to invest shareholders’ dollars in a manner consistent with that investment focus. Otherwise, a fund’s portfolio might be inconsistent with what fund investors desired when selecting a fund based upon its name.” The sole dissenting vote against the rule modification, Commissioner Mark Uyeda, said “[w]ith these amendments, the Commission overemphasizes the importance of a fund’s name, as if to suggest that investors and their financial professionals need not look at the prospectus disclosures.” Commissioner Uyeda also expressed concern that fund investors will bear the increased compliance costs associated with the rule change.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 31, 2023

As discussed in our prior publication (found here), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments on December 14, 2022, regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. On May 25, 2023, the SEC issued three new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) relating to the Rule 10b5-1 amendments.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.