SEC Approves Final Rules Implementing JOBS Act and FAST Act

May 13, 2016

Reading Time : 5 min

Background

The JOBS Act was signed into law on April 5, 2012. Titles V and VI of the JOBS Act changed the 1934 Act in three significant ways:

1. Relaxed Registration Requirements. The JOBS Act relaxed the total asset and holder of record thresholds above which an issuer is required to register its securities under Section 12(g)(1) of the 1934 Act. Previously, an issuer was required to register its securities if the issuer had total assets exceeding $1 million and the securities were “held of record” by at least 500 persons. Section 501 of the JOBS Act raised the asset threshold from $1 million to $10 million and modified the ownership threshold so that registration would be required if the securities were “held of record” either by (i) 2,000 persons or (ii) 500 persons who are not “accredited investors” (as such term is defined by the Commission).

2. Special Rules for Banks and Bank Holding Companies. Section 601 of the JOBS Act provided additional exceptions for bank and bank holding companies, as defined in Section 2 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. A bank or bank holding company is required to register its securities if it has $10 million in assets and at least 2,000 holders of record. The Commission had previously clarified that the 500 non-accredited investor threshold described above is not applicable to bank and bank holding companies. Additionally, a bank or bank holding company may terminate registration under Section 12(g)(4) of the 1934 Act if its number of holders of record is fewer than 1,200 persons. Other issuers may only de-register their securities under Section 12(g)(4) of the 1934 Act if their holders of record are fewer than 300 persons.

3. Exception for Securities Received in Employee Compensation Plans. Section 502 of the JOBS Act exempts persons who receive securities under an “employee compensation plan” in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act”) from being counted as a “holder of record” for purposes of the registration requirement under Section 12(g)(1) of the 1934 Act. Section 503 of the JOBS Act also specifically directs the Commission to “adopt safe harbor provisions” that issuers can follow in determining whether this exception applies to particular holders.

On December 4, 2015, the FAST Act was signed into law. Section 85001 of the FAST Act provides that the thresholds for registration, termination of registration and suspension of reporting for savings and loan holding companies, as defined in Section 10 of the Home Owners’ Loan Act, under the 1934 Act would be the same as those applicable to bank and bank holding companies.

The Final Rules

The Commission proposed regulations on December 17, 2014, prior to the enactment of the FAST Act, and issued its final regulations on May 3, 2016. The final rules modified Rules 12g-1, (exemption from Section 12(g)), 12g-2 (securities deemed registered upon termination of exemption), 12g-3 (registration of securities of successor issuers), 12g-4 (termination of registration) and 12h-3 (suspension of duty to file reports under Section 15(d)) under the 1934 Act to conform with the new thresholds for registration, termination of registration and suspension of reporting set forth in the legislation described above, including those applicable to banks, bank holding companies and savings and loan companies.

Additionally, the final rules clarified that the definition of an “accredited investor” for purposes of determining whether a security is held of record by fewer than 500 people who are not accredited investors under Section 12(g)(1) is as defined in Rule 501(a) under Regulation D. The determination of a person’s status as an accredited investor is to be made as of the last day of the issuer’s most recent fiscal year. Under Rule 501(a), if the issuer “reasonably believes” that a person satisfies the definition of an accredited investor, such person will be deemed to be an accredited investor. Some commenters to the proposed rules had asked the Commission to adopt safe harbors that issuers could rely on in making this determination. Unfortunately, no such safe harbors appear in the final rules. The Commission release states that “an issuer will need to determine, based on facts and circumstances, whether prior information provides a basis for a reasonable belief that the security holder continues to be an accredited investor as of the last day of the fiscal year.”

Finally, the rules implemented Sections 502 and 503 of the JOBS Act, exempting persons who received securities in an employee compensation plan from counting towards the number of “holders of record” of the security. Rules 12h-1(f) and (g) currently provide a much more limited exemption from registration for stock options issued under written compensation plans, and the new rules do not change or repeal this existing exemption. Instead, the final rules amend the definition of “held of record” to exclude securities received pursuant to an “employee compensation plan” in transactions exempt from Section 5 of the 1933 Act. The definition also excludes securities received in exchange for such securities (pursuant to a business combination or otherwise), provided the recipient was entitled to receive securities under Rule 701(c) promulgated under the 1933 Act at the time the original securities were issued. Rule 701(c) identifies the conditions under which certain issuances of securities under a written compensatory benefit plan will be exempt from registration under the 1933 Act.

The rules do not define “employee compensation plan,” but they do provide a nonexclusive safe harbor: A person will be deemed to have received securities pursuant to an employee compensation plan if the conditions of Rule 701(c) are satisfied. In addition, solely for purposes of Section 12(g), an issuance will be deemed exempt from registration under the 1933 Act if the issuer had a reasonable belief at the time of the issuance that the securities were so exempt.

The Commission release clarifies that, where an employee is deemed not to be a holder of record under the new rules, family members who receive securities as a result of the employee’s gift, domestic relations order or death will likewise not be deemed holders of record.

Effect of the Rules on Foreign Private Issuers

Rule 12g3-2(a) currently provides that a foreign private issuer’s securities shall be exempt from registration if it has fewer than 300 holders resident in the United States. For purposes of Rule 12g3-2(a), foreign private issuers may rely on the new exemption to the definition of “holders of record” in determining their number of U.S. holders. However, U.S. employees who fall under this exemption must continue to be counted for purposes of determining the percentage of outstanding voting securities held by U.S. residents, which will determine whether an issuer is a foreign private issuer in the first place.

Effective Date

The rules become effective on June 9, 2016.


This is 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, which occurred on May 10, 2016.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

June 27, 2024

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published five new Form 8-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) expanding the agency’s interpretations of cybersecurity incident disclosures pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. In July 2023, the SEC adopted final rules with respect to cybersecurity incidents that generally require public companies to disclose (i) material cybersecurity incidents within four business days after determining the incident was material and (ii) material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance on an annual basis. We wrote about the final cybersecurity disclosure rules here.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 12, 2024

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted final rules (available here; also see the fact sheet and press release) representing significant changes to  special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), shell companies and the disclosure of projections. These rules aim to enhance disclosures, protect investors and align the regulatory framework for SPACs with traditional IPOs. The following summarizes the key aspects of these rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

October 4, 2023

On September 20, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule amending the so-called “Names Rule” (found here) that is “designed to modernize and enhance” protections under Rule 35d-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The final rule is part of the SEC’s holistic efforts to regulate environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, and is the SEC’s latest attempt to curb greenwashing in U.S. capital markets. The amendments require registered investment funds that include ESG factors in their names to place 80% of their assets in investments corresponding to those factors, thereby extending to ESG funds the SEC’s long-standing approach of regulating the names of registered funds to ensure they are marketed to investors truthfully. Fund complexes with more than $1 billion in assets will have two years from the final rule’s effective date (60 days after publication in the Federal Register) to comply, while fund complexes with less than $1 billion in assets will be given a compliance period of 30 months.

Chair Gary Gensler said “[t]he Names Rule reflects a basic idea: A fund’s investment portfolio should match a fund’s advertised investment focus. In essence, if a fund’s name suggests an investment focus, the fund in turn needs to invest shareholders’ dollars in a manner consistent with that investment focus. Otherwise, a fund’s portfolio might be inconsistent with what fund investors desired when selecting a fund based upon its name.” The sole dissenting vote against the rule modification, Commissioner Mark Uyeda, said “[w]ith these amendments, the Commission overemphasizes the importance of a fund’s name, as if to suggest that investors and their financial professionals need not look at the prospectus disclosures.” Commissioner Uyeda also expressed concern that fund investors will bear the increased compliance costs associated with the rule change.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 31, 2023

As discussed in our prior publication (found here), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments on December 14, 2022, regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. On May 25, 2023, the SEC issued three new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) relating to the Rule 10b5-1 amendments.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 24, 2023

On May 15, 2023, the Eastern District of California ruled that California Assembly Bill No. 979 (“AB 979”) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. As enacted, California’s Board Diversity Statute, required public companies with headquarters in the state to include a minimum number of directors from “underrepresented communities” or be subject to fines for violating the statute. AB 979 defines a “director from an underrepresented community” as “an individual who self-identifies as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Native, or who self-identifies as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.”

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 9, 2023

Update: On October 31, 2023, the Fifth Circuit granted the US Chamber of Commerce's petition for review of the SEC's share repurchase disclosure rules, holding that the SEC acted arbitrarily and capriciously in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The court directed the SEC to correct the defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 1, 2023, the SEC informed the Fifth Circuit that it was unable to correct the rule's defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 19, 2023, the Fifth Circuit vacated the SEC’s share repurchase disclosure rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

April 12, 2023

We have released our 2023 ESG Survey which includes a collection of reports reflecting on significant ESG themes and trends from 2022, as well as what we believe to be key developments for 2023.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 6, 2023

As companies begin preparing for the 2023 proxy season, we note that Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) and Glass Lewis, the leading providers of corporate governance solutions and proxy advisory services, issued updated benchmark policies (proxy voting guidelines), which can be found here and here, respectively. The updated proxy voting guidelines generally focus on board accountability and oversight considerations and address topics such as climate accountability, board diversity, shareholder rights, corporate governance standards, executive compensation and social issues. What follows is a summary of the proxy voting guidelines published by ISS and Glass Lewis for the 2023 proxy season.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.