SEC Proposes Amendments to Financial Disclosure Rules for Guaranteed and Secured Debt Securities

Oct 10, 2018

Reading Time : 3 min

Rule 3-10: Guaranteed Debt Securities

Current Requirements

A guarantee of a debt security is a separate security under the Securities Act, and therefore offers and sales of such guarantees must be either registered or exempt from registration under the Securities Act. In a registered offering of guaranteed securities, each guarantor is viewed as an issuer and required to provide separate financial statements, subject to exceptions in Rule 3-10 for full and unconditional guarantees in corporate structures in which each guarantor or issuer subsidiary is 100 percent owned by its parent entity. If the Rule’s detailed conditions are met, specified “Alternative Disclosures” may be provided under Rule 3-10 in lieu of separate financial statements for each issuer and guarantor.

Proposed Amendments

The proposed amendments to Rule 3-10 would continue to permit the omission of separate financial statements of subsidiary issuers and guarantors subject to certain conditions, which would also be simplified by the proposed amendments.  If the conditions are met, an issuer may present “Proposed Alternative Disclosures” that generally simplify the required disclosures compared to the existing rules. In particular, the proposed amendments would:

  • replace the condition that a subsidiary issuer or guarantor be 100 percent owned by the parent company with a condition that it be consolidated in the parent company’s consolidated financial statements
  • replace the requirement to present detailed, condensed, consolidating financial information in many situations with a requirement to present summarized financial information, as defined in Rule 1-02 of Regulation S-X, which may be presented on a combined basis for the most recent fiscal year and interim period
  • expand the required non-financial disclosures, including qualitative narrative disclosures about the guarantees, issuers and guarantors
  • permit the Proposed Alternative Disclosures to be provided outside the footnotes to the parent company’s consolidated financial statements in the registration statement covering the offer and sale of the subject securities and in certain Exchange Act reports filed shortly thereafter, which is intended to facilitate offerings during favorable market conditions without the cost and delay of preparing audited financial information under the existing rules
  • require that the Proposed Alternative Disclosures be included in the footnotes to the parent company’s consolidated financial statements beginning with the annual report for the fiscal year during which the first bona fide sale of the subject securities is completed
  • eliminate the requirement to provide detailed pre-acquisition financial statements of recently-acquired subsidiary issuers and guarantors under Rule 3-10(g)
  • simplify the eligibility criteria for issuer and guarantor parent and subsidiary structures
  • permit the Proposed Alternative Disclosures to be terminated if the issuers and guarantors can terminate or suspend their Exchange Act reporting obligations with respect to the guaranteed securities, rather than continuing to require the supplemental disclosures for as long as the guaranteed securities are outstanding.

Rule 3-16: Affiliates Whose Securities Collateralize a Registrant’s Securities

Current Requirements

Rule 3-16 requires a registrant to provide separate financial statements for each affiliate whose securities constitute a “substantial portion” of the collateral for any class of registered securities. Whether an affiliate’s portion of the collateral is a “substantial portion” is determined by comparing the principal amount of the registered securities to the highest amount among the aggregate principal amount, par value, book value, or market value of the affiliate’s securities. If the highest of those values equals or exceeds 20% of the principal amount of the registered securities, separate financial statements are required.

Proposed Amendments

The proposed amendments to Rule 3-16 would simplify the disclosures required for affiliates whose securities collateralize registered securities and provide for more consistent presentation by removing the existing 20 percent threshold.  Among other things, the amendments would:

  • replace the existing requirement to provide separate financial statements for each affiliate whose securities are pledged as collateral with specified supplemental financial and non-financial disclosures about the affiliate(s) and the collateral arrangement, which may be presented on a combined basis, subject to certain conditions
  • permit the proposed supplemental financial and non-financial disclosures to be provided outside the footnotes to the registrant’s consolidated financial statements in the registration statement covering the offer and sale of the subject securities, and in certain Exchange Act reports filed shortly thereafter, to facilitate offerings during favorable market conditions
  • require that the proposed supplemental financial and non-financial disclosures be included in the footnotes to the registrant’s consolidated financial statements beginning with the annual report for the fiscal year during which the first bona fide sale of the subject securities is completed
  • replace the requirement to provide disclosure only when the pledged securities meet or exceed a numerical threshold (the 20 percent test) relative to the registered securities with a requirement to provide the proposed financial and non-financial disclosures in all cases, unless they are immaterial to holders of the collateralized security.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

June 27, 2024

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published five new Form 8-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) expanding the agency’s interpretations of cybersecurity incident disclosures pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. In July 2023, the SEC adopted final rules with respect to cybersecurity incidents that generally require public companies to disclose (i) material cybersecurity incidents within four business days after determining the incident was material and (ii) material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance on an annual basis. We wrote about the final cybersecurity disclosure rules here.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 12, 2024

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted final rules (available here; also see the fact sheet and press release) representing significant changes to  special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), shell companies and the disclosure of projections. These rules aim to enhance disclosures, protect investors and align the regulatory framework for SPACs with traditional IPOs. The following summarizes the key aspects of these rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

October 4, 2023

On September 20, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule amending the so-called “Names Rule” (found here) that is “designed to modernize and enhance” protections under Rule 35d-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The final rule is part of the SEC’s holistic efforts to regulate environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, and is the SEC’s latest attempt to curb greenwashing in U.S. capital markets. The amendments require registered investment funds that include ESG factors in their names to place 80% of their assets in investments corresponding to those factors, thereby extending to ESG funds the SEC’s long-standing approach of regulating the names of registered funds to ensure they are marketed to investors truthfully. Fund complexes with more than $1 billion in assets will have two years from the final rule’s effective date (60 days after publication in the Federal Register) to comply, while fund complexes with less than $1 billion in assets will be given a compliance period of 30 months.

Chair Gary Gensler said “[t]he Names Rule reflects a basic idea: A fund’s investment portfolio should match a fund’s advertised investment focus. In essence, if a fund’s name suggests an investment focus, the fund in turn needs to invest shareholders’ dollars in a manner consistent with that investment focus. Otherwise, a fund’s portfolio might be inconsistent with what fund investors desired when selecting a fund based upon its name.” The sole dissenting vote against the rule modification, Commissioner Mark Uyeda, said “[w]ith these amendments, the Commission overemphasizes the importance of a fund’s name, as if to suggest that investors and their financial professionals need not look at the prospectus disclosures.” Commissioner Uyeda also expressed concern that fund investors will bear the increased compliance costs associated with the rule change.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 31, 2023

As discussed in our prior publication (found here), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments on December 14, 2022, regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. On May 25, 2023, the SEC issued three new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) relating to the Rule 10b5-1 amendments.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 24, 2023

On May 15, 2023, the Eastern District of California ruled that California Assembly Bill No. 979 (“AB 979”) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. As enacted, California’s Board Diversity Statute, required public companies with headquarters in the state to include a minimum number of directors from “underrepresented communities” or be subject to fines for violating the statute. AB 979 defines a “director from an underrepresented community” as “an individual who self-identifies as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Native, or who self-identifies as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.”

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 9, 2023

Update: On October 31, 2023, the Fifth Circuit granted the US Chamber of Commerce's petition for review of the SEC's share repurchase disclosure rules, holding that the SEC acted arbitrarily and capriciously in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The court directed the SEC to correct the defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 1, 2023, the SEC informed the Fifth Circuit that it was unable to correct the rule's defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 19, 2023, the Fifth Circuit vacated the SEC’s share repurchase disclosure rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

April 12, 2023

We have released our 2023 ESG Survey which includes a collection of reports reflecting on significant ESG themes and trends from 2022, as well as what we believe to be key developments for 2023.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 6, 2023

As companies begin preparing for the 2023 proxy season, we note that Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) and Glass Lewis, the leading providers of corporate governance solutions and proxy advisory services, issued updated benchmark policies (proxy voting guidelines), which can be found here and here, respectively. The updated proxy voting guidelines generally focus on board accountability and oversight considerations and address topics such as climate accountability, board diversity, shareholder rights, corporate governance standards, executive compensation and social issues. What follows is a summary of the proxy voting guidelines published by ISS and Glass Lewis for the 2023 proxy season.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.