SEC Proposes Amendments to Modernize and Simplify Regulation S-K

Oct 17, 2017

Reading Time : 5 min

Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A)

Permit Elimination of Earliest Year of Results of Operations Discussion

Permit registrants to eliminate the discussion of the earliest year of results of operations when financial statements included in a filing cover three years if (i) that discussion is not material to an understanding of the registrant’s financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations; and (ii) the registrant has filed its prior-year Form 10-K on EDGAR, which includes MD&A covering such period. (Item 303(a) of Regulation S-K)

Confidential or Immaterial Information

Permit Redaction of Confidential Information in Material Contract Exhibits

Permit registrants to omit confidential information from filed material contracts where such information is both (i) not material and (ii) competitively harmful if publicly disclosed, even where the registrant has not submitted a confidential-treatment request to the SEC. Instead, registrants would be required to (i) mark the exhibit index to indicate that portions of the exhibit or exhibits have been omitted (ii) include a prominent statement on the first page of each redacted exhibit that information in the marked sections of the exhibit has been omitted from the filed version of the exhibit and (iii) indicate with brackets where the information has been omitted from the filed version of the exhibit. Notwithstanding the proposed revisions, upon request by the SEC staff, registrants would be required to promptly provide an unredacted copy of the contract, together with their analysis of materiality and competitive harm (which analysis may be filed with a confidential treatment request). (Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K)

Permit Redaction of Personally Identifiable Information (PII)

Permit registrants to omit Personally Identifiable Information (PII) without submitting a confidential-treatment request under Rule 406 or Rule 24b-2. Under the proposed amendment, registrants also would not be required to provide an analysis to redact PII from exhibits. (Item 601(a)(6) of Regulation S-K)

Permit Redaction of Schedules and Attachments to Exhibits

Similar to the existing accommodation in Item 601(b)(2), permit registrants to omit entire schedules and similar attachments to exhibits, unless they contain material information and unless that information is not otherwise disclosed in the exhibit or the disclosure document. Also similar to Item 601(b)(2), registrants would be required to provide with each exhibit a list briefly identifying the contents of any omitted schedules and attachments. Notwithstanding the proposed revisions, upon request by the SEC staff, registrants would be required to provide, on a supplemental basis, a copy of any omitted schedules or attachments. (Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K)

Exhibits

Limitation of Two-Year Look Back for Material Contracts

Remove the requirement for registrants to file a material contract that has been fully performed before the filing of a registration statement or report, but was entered into within two years of such filing. The proposed amendment would exclude “newly reporting registrants.” (Item 601(b)(10)(i) of Regulation S-K)

Disclosure of Legal Entity Identifier (LEI)

In their exhibit listing all of their significant subsidiaries, require registrants to include the LEI (i.e., a 20-character, alpha-numeric code that allows for unique identification of entities engaged in financial transactions), if one has been obtained, of the registrant and each subsidiary listed. (Item 601(b)(21)(i) of Regulation S-K)

Description of Registered Securities

Require registrants to provide a brief description of their securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act (i.e., registered capital stock, debt securities, warrants, rights, American Depositary Receipts, and other securities) as an exhibit to Form 10-K, rather than limiting this disclosure to registration statements. The proposed amendment would exclude market information for securities other than common equity, where there is an established trading market for those securities. When previously filed, and assuming that there has been no material change, registrants may incorporate the information by reference and provide a hyperlink to the previously filed exhibit. (Item 601(b)(4)(vi) of Regulation S-K)

Other

Description of Property

Permit registrants to limit the disclosure of physical properties to the extent material. The proposed amendment would clarify that the disclosure should focus on physical properties that are material to the registrant and may be provided on a collective basis, if appropriate. Given the particular significance of this disclosure for registrants in the mining, real estate, and oil and gas industries, however, the proposed amendment would not modify the requirement that such registrants provide a detailed description regarding properties on a property-by-property basis. (Item 102 of Regulation S-K)

Tagging Cover Page Data

Require registrants to tag all of the information on the cover pages of Forms 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, 20-F and 40-F in Inline XBRL (i.e., XBRL data embedded into the HTML document, instead of the traditional method of attaching as a separate exhibit). In addition to the existing data points on the covers of these forms, the proposed amendment would add the trading symbol for each class of registered securities as an additional data point to be tagged in Inline XBRL. Because, unlike Forms 10-K, 20-F and Form 40-F, the cover pages of Forms 10-Q and 8-K do not currently require disclosure of the title of each class of securities and each exchange on which they are registered, the cover pages of these forms would be revised to include such disclosure in addition to the trading symbol. (New Rule 406 of Regulation S-T, new Item 601(b)(104) of Regulation S-K, new paragraph 104 to the “Instructions as to Exhibits” of Form 20-F and new paragraph B.17 to the “General Instructions” of Form 40-F)

Background

The proposed amendments, based on recommendations made in the SEC staff’s Report on Modernization and Simplification of Regulation S-K, were mandated by Section 72003 of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) and, together with previously proposed amendments mandated by Section 72002 of the FAST Act, are the result of a congressional directive to “modernize and simplify [the] requirements [of Regulation S-K] in a manner that reduces the costs and burdens on issuers while still providing all material information.” The changes are consistent with the SEC’s ongoing “Disclosure Effectiveness Initiative”, whereby it is considering whether existing disclosure requirements should be modified or eliminated, whether new disclosure requirements should be created, and whether disclosures could be presented and provided more effectively.

Additional Information

Comments on the proposed amendments are due 60 days after publication in the Federal Register and may be submitted online. For additional commentary on the proposed amendments, please see the prepared remarks of Chairman Jay Clayton, Commissioner Kara M. Stein and Commissioner Michael S. Piwowar.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

June 27, 2024

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published five new Form 8-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) expanding the agency’s interpretations of cybersecurity incident disclosures pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. In July 2023, the SEC adopted final rules with respect to cybersecurity incidents that generally require public companies to disclose (i) material cybersecurity incidents within four business days after determining the incident was material and (ii) material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance on an annual basis. We wrote about the final cybersecurity disclosure rules here.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 12, 2024

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted final rules (available here; also see the fact sheet and press release) representing significant changes to  special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), shell companies and the disclosure of projections. These rules aim to enhance disclosures, protect investors and align the regulatory framework for SPACs with traditional IPOs. The following summarizes the key aspects of these rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

October 4, 2023

On September 20, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule amending the so-called “Names Rule” (found here) that is “designed to modernize and enhance” protections under Rule 35d-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The final rule is part of the SEC’s holistic efforts to regulate environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, and is the SEC’s latest attempt to curb greenwashing in U.S. capital markets. The amendments require registered investment funds that include ESG factors in their names to place 80% of their assets in investments corresponding to those factors, thereby extending to ESG funds the SEC’s long-standing approach of regulating the names of registered funds to ensure they are marketed to investors truthfully. Fund complexes with more than $1 billion in assets will have two years from the final rule’s effective date (60 days after publication in the Federal Register) to comply, while fund complexes with less than $1 billion in assets will be given a compliance period of 30 months.

Chair Gary Gensler said “[t]he Names Rule reflects a basic idea: A fund’s investment portfolio should match a fund’s advertised investment focus. In essence, if a fund’s name suggests an investment focus, the fund in turn needs to invest shareholders’ dollars in a manner consistent with that investment focus. Otherwise, a fund’s portfolio might be inconsistent with what fund investors desired when selecting a fund based upon its name.” The sole dissenting vote against the rule modification, Commissioner Mark Uyeda, said “[w]ith these amendments, the Commission overemphasizes the importance of a fund’s name, as if to suggest that investors and their financial professionals need not look at the prospectus disclosures.” Commissioner Uyeda also expressed concern that fund investors will bear the increased compliance costs associated with the rule change.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 31, 2023

As discussed in our prior publication (found here), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments on December 14, 2022, regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. On May 25, 2023, the SEC issued three new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) relating to the Rule 10b5-1 amendments.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 24, 2023

On May 15, 2023, the Eastern District of California ruled that California Assembly Bill No. 979 (“AB 979”) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. As enacted, California’s Board Diversity Statute, required public companies with headquarters in the state to include a minimum number of directors from “underrepresented communities” or be subject to fines for violating the statute. AB 979 defines a “director from an underrepresented community” as “an individual who self-identifies as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Native, or who self-identifies as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.”

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 9, 2023

Update: On October 31, 2023, the Fifth Circuit granted the US Chamber of Commerce's petition for review of the SEC's share repurchase disclosure rules, holding that the SEC acted arbitrarily and capriciously in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The court directed the SEC to correct the defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 1, 2023, the SEC informed the Fifth Circuit that it was unable to correct the rule's defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 19, 2023, the Fifth Circuit vacated the SEC’s share repurchase disclosure rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

April 12, 2023

We have released our 2023 ESG Survey which includes a collection of reports reflecting on significant ESG themes and trends from 2022, as well as what we believe to be key developments for 2023.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 6, 2023

As companies begin preparing for the 2023 proxy season, we note that Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) and Glass Lewis, the leading providers of corporate governance solutions and proxy advisory services, issued updated benchmark policies (proxy voting guidelines), which can be found here and here, respectively. The updated proxy voting guidelines generally focus on board accountability and oversight considerations and address topics such as climate accountability, board diversity, shareholder rights, corporate governance standards, executive compensation and social issues. What follows is a summary of the proxy voting guidelines published by ISS and Glass Lewis for the 2023 proxy season.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.