SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance Provides Updated Guidance on Disclosure Considerations Regarding Operations, Liquidity and Capital Resources in Light of COVID-19

Jul 1, 2020

Reading Time : 4 min

In broad terms, Topic No. 9A emphasizes that disclosure should allow investors to understand how a company’s board and senior management are evaluating the current and expected impact of COVID-19 on its operations and financial condition, including liquidity and capital resources. Additionally, Topic No. 9A points out that companies should monitor their facts and circumstances so that they can “proactively revise and update” disclosures to investors in response to any changes in facts and circumstances.

Operations, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Topic No. 9A provides various considerations in the form of questions that companies should weigh as they assess the adequacy of their disclosure about the impact of COVID-19. These considerations are intended to help companies provide robust and transparent disclosures about any operational adjustments they have made and any financing activities they have undertaken in the current economic environment. Below are some highlights of the considerations covered in Topic No. 9A.

  • Operations: Companies should consider disclosing the operational challenges they are monitoring and evaluating as a result of COVID-19, the extent to which they have altered operations in response to COVID-19 and the impact such changes have had on their financial condition and short- and long-term liquidity.
  • Liquidity: Companies should consider how their overall liquidity position and outlook is evolving in light of COVID-19. For example, companies should consider the extent to which COVID-19 has affected revenues and whether such impact is material to their sources and uses of funds. Companies are also urged to disclose material assumptions made about the magnitude and duration of COVID-19’s impact on revenues and discuss whether decreases in cash flows from operations would have a material impact on their liquidity position and outlook.
  • Indebtedness: Companies should consider disclosing whether they have accessed revolving lines of credit or raised capital to address liquidity needs. Additionally, companies should discuss whether COVID-19 affects their ability to access traditional funding sources on the same or reasonably similar terms as previously available. If companies find it necessary to provide additional collateral or guarantees, or have incurred an increased cost of capital, they should consider disclosing this information. Further, companies that are concerned about complying with their debt service obligations or debt covenants in the future, or that are taking advantage of available payment deferrals, forbearance periods or concessions should consider disclosing such information so that investors have a clear understanding of any liquidity challenges.
  • Cash Burn: Companies that disclose information relating to cash burn rate or daily cash use should also consider whether they are providing a clear definition of the metric and explaining how management actually uses the metric in managing and monitoring liquidity. Additionally, to avoid misleading investors, such companies are urged to consider the reasonableness of any underlying estimates and assumptions relating to cash burn.
  • Capital Expenditures and Other Cash Outlays: Companies should provide information regarding any capital expenditure reductions in response to COVID-19, including reductions in human capital resource expenditures. Companies should also disclose if they have decided to suspend or reduce any share repurchase program or dividend payments in response to COVID-19. In discussing the foregoing, companies should clarify whether such measures are temporary and what factors will be considered when deciding whether any such measures are extended or curtailed. Companies should also consider discussing the short- and long-term impact of reductions, including any impacts to their ability to generate revenues, and meet existing and future financial obligations.
  • Payment Terms: If companies alter terms with customers (e.g., extended payment terms or refund periods), provide concessions (e.g., as a landlord or lender) or otherwise modify contractual arrangements in response to COVID-19, they should discuss any material impact that such actions would have on their financial condition, liquidity and capital resources.
  • Supplier Finance Programs: Companies relying on a supplier finance program should disclose the material terms of such an arrangement and any material impact of the arrangement on their balance sheet, statements of cash flow or short- and long-term liquidity. Additionally, companies should consider discussing any guarantees related to such a program (including subsidiary guarantees) and any material risk if a party to the arrangement terminates.
  • Subsequent Events: When assessing events occurring after the end of a reporting period, companies should consider whether the impact of such events is material enough to warrant disclosure as a subsequent event in the financial statements and as a known trend or uncertainty in management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A).

Government Assistance – CARES Act

According to Topic No. 9A, companies should consider disclosure relating to any loans and tax relief received under the CARES Act. In particular, companies should consider discussing material terms of such loans, whether such terms limit their ability to seek other sources of financing or increase the cost of capital, whether any loan restrictions have a material impact on their revenues or income from operations and whether any lapse in loan restrictions will result in a material change in their operations. For any tax relief, companies should consider disclosing the impact of such relief on short- and long-term liquidity and whether they anticipate a material tax refund for prior periods. Finally, companies should consider disclosing the extent to which any assistance under the CARES Act involves new material accounting estimates or judgments or any change in prior critical accounting estimates.

Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

When preparing a company’s MD&A, Topic No. 9A notes that management should consider whether conditions and events exist that raise substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern (e.g., defaults on outstanding obligations, labor challenges or work stoppages). Management should also consider its plans to address these challenges and discuss the extent to which any of these plans have been implemented.

Additional Information

Topic No. 9A reminds companies that in addition to the disclosure topics discussed above, COVID-19 may materially impact a number of other disclosures, such as disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. For additional information on accounting and auditing matters related to COVID-19, Topic No. 9A refers to SEC Chief Accountant Sagar Teotia’s Statement on the Continued Importance of High-Quality Financial Reporting for Investors in Light of COVID-19, which we discuss here.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

June 27, 2024

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published five new Form 8-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) expanding the agency’s interpretations of cybersecurity incident disclosures pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. In July 2023, the SEC adopted final rules with respect to cybersecurity incidents that generally require public companies to disclose (i) material cybersecurity incidents within four business days after determining the incident was material and (ii) material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance on an annual basis. We wrote about the final cybersecurity disclosure rules here.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 12, 2024

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted final rules (available here; also see the fact sheet and press release) representing significant changes to  special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), shell companies and the disclosure of projections. These rules aim to enhance disclosures, protect investors and align the regulatory framework for SPACs with traditional IPOs. The following summarizes the key aspects of these rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

October 4, 2023

On September 20, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule amending the so-called “Names Rule” (found here) that is “designed to modernize and enhance” protections under Rule 35d-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The final rule is part of the SEC’s holistic efforts to regulate environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, and is the SEC’s latest attempt to curb greenwashing in U.S. capital markets. The amendments require registered investment funds that include ESG factors in their names to place 80% of their assets in investments corresponding to those factors, thereby extending to ESG funds the SEC’s long-standing approach of regulating the names of registered funds to ensure they are marketed to investors truthfully. Fund complexes with more than $1 billion in assets will have two years from the final rule’s effective date (60 days after publication in the Federal Register) to comply, while fund complexes with less than $1 billion in assets will be given a compliance period of 30 months.

Chair Gary Gensler said “[t]he Names Rule reflects a basic idea: A fund’s investment portfolio should match a fund’s advertised investment focus. In essence, if a fund’s name suggests an investment focus, the fund in turn needs to invest shareholders’ dollars in a manner consistent with that investment focus. Otherwise, a fund’s portfolio might be inconsistent with what fund investors desired when selecting a fund based upon its name.” The sole dissenting vote against the rule modification, Commissioner Mark Uyeda, said “[w]ith these amendments, the Commission overemphasizes the importance of a fund’s name, as if to suggest that investors and their financial professionals need not look at the prospectus disclosures.” Commissioner Uyeda also expressed concern that fund investors will bear the increased compliance costs associated with the rule change.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 31, 2023

As discussed in our prior publication (found here), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments on December 14, 2022, regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. On May 25, 2023, the SEC issued three new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) relating to the Rule 10b5-1 amendments.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 24, 2023

On May 15, 2023, the Eastern District of California ruled that California Assembly Bill No. 979 (“AB 979”) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. As enacted, California’s Board Diversity Statute, required public companies with headquarters in the state to include a minimum number of directors from “underrepresented communities” or be subject to fines for violating the statute. AB 979 defines a “director from an underrepresented community” as “an individual who self-identifies as Black, African American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, Native American, Native Hawaiian, or Alaska Native, or who self-identifies as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.”

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 9, 2023

Update: On October 31, 2023, the Fifth Circuit granted the US Chamber of Commerce's petition for review of the SEC's share repurchase disclosure rules, holding that the SEC acted arbitrarily and capriciously in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The court directed the SEC to correct the defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 1, 2023, the SEC informed the Fifth Circuit that it was unable to correct the rule's defects within 30 days of the opinion. On December 19, 2023, the Fifth Circuit vacated the SEC’s share repurchase disclosure rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

April 12, 2023

We have released our 2023 ESG Survey which includes a collection of reports reflecting on significant ESG themes and trends from 2022, as well as what we believe to be key developments for 2023.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 6, 2023

As companies begin preparing for the 2023 proxy season, we note that Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) and Glass Lewis, the leading providers of corporate governance solutions and proxy advisory services, issued updated benchmark policies (proxy voting guidelines), which can be found here and here, respectively. The updated proxy voting guidelines generally focus on board accountability and oversight considerations and address topics such as climate accountability, board diversity, shareholder rights, corporate governance standards, executive compensation and social issues. What follows is a summary of the proxy voting guidelines published by ISS and Glass Lewis for the 2023 proxy season.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.