Senate Committee Turns Attention to Online Advertising Security

May 15, 2014

Reading Time : 2 min

By: Francine E. Friedman, Matthew C. Thomas (Senior Public Policy Specialist)

The findings of the report state that consumers face exposure to malware throughout the course of their usual activity on the internet. Furthermore, the report found that the complexity of online advertising practices impedes industry accountability for malware attacks, and that self-regulatory bodies have not adequately ensured consumer security. Based on its findings, the report recommends four specific actions:

  1. Establish better practices and clearer rules to prevent online advertising abuses;
  2. Strengthen security information exchanges within the online advertising industry to prevent abuses;
  3. Clarify specific prohibited practices in online advertising to prevent abuses and protect consumers; and
  4. Develop additional “circuit breakers” or checkpoints to ensure malicious ads are intercepted before reaching consumers.

On May 15, 2014, the Subcommittee held a hearing on the findings of the report. Subcommittee Chairman John McCain (R-AZ), who spurred the report, stated in the hearing that “this review is needed to provide greater clarity on what is required of advertising companies to ensure consumer safety, and who should be held responsible when an advertisement harms consumers.” Witnesses at the hearing included representatives from Google and Yahoo, the Federal Trade Commission and online advertising industry trade groups.

Last week, Google and Yahoo launched a new initiative, Trust in Ads, with the goal of protecting consumers from malware hidden in online advertisements. Despite their new initiative, Sen. McCain criticized the two companies, saying they did not do enough to prevent harm to consumers from such malware.

Online privacy and data security is an issue Sen. McCain has been actively involved with for many years. In the 112th Congress, he was the lead co-sponsor to a data privacy bill introduced by then-Senator John Kerry (D-MA) that contained provisions relating to online tracking of consumer habits. Sen. McCain previously served as Chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee which has oversight over online advertising issues.

A number of senators at the hearing, including Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI), opposed Sen. McCain’s calls for new legislation to address this issue, arguing that Congress and federal regulators are not agile enough to regulate online ads, and that web giants such as Google and Yahoo are in a better position to self-police the industry. The senators also argued in favor of a set of industry-developed best practices for protecting consumers from malicious ads.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Deal Diary

June 27, 2024

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published five new Form 8-K Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) expanding the agency’s interpretations of cybersecurity incident disclosures pursuant to Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. In July 2023, the SEC adopted final rules with respect to cybersecurity incidents that generally require public companies to disclose (i) material cybersecurity incidents within four business days after determining the incident was material and (ii) material information regarding their cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance on an annual basis. We wrote about the final cybersecurity disclosure rules here.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

February 12, 2024

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently adopted final rules (available here; also see the fact sheet and press release) representing significant changes to  special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), shell companies and the disclosure of projections. These rules aim to enhance disclosures, protect investors and align the regulatory framework for SPACs with traditional IPOs. The following summarizes the key aspects of these rules.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

October 4, 2023

On September 20, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a final rule amending the so-called “Names Rule” (found here) that is “designed to modernize and enhance” protections under Rule 35d-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The final rule is part of the SEC’s holistic efforts to regulate environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, and is the SEC’s latest attempt to curb greenwashing in U.S. capital markets. The amendments require registered investment funds that include ESG factors in their names to place 80% of their assets in investments corresponding to those factors, thereby extending to ESG funds the SEC’s long-standing approach of regulating the names of registered funds to ensure they are marketed to investors truthfully. Fund complexes with more than $1 billion in assets will have two years from the final rule’s effective date (60 days after publication in the Federal Register) to comply, while fund complexes with less than $1 billion in assets will be given a compliance period of 30 months.

Chair Gary Gensler said “[t]he Names Rule reflects a basic idea: A fund’s investment portfolio should match a fund’s advertised investment focus. In essence, if a fund’s name suggests an investment focus, the fund in turn needs to invest shareholders’ dollars in a manner consistent with that investment focus. Otherwise, a fund’s portfolio might be inconsistent with what fund investors desired when selecting a fund based upon its name.” The sole dissenting vote against the rule modification, Commissioner Mark Uyeda, said “[w]ith these amendments, the Commission overemphasizes the importance of a fund’s name, as if to suggest that investors and their financial professionals need not look at the prospectus disclosures.” Commissioner Uyeda also expressed concern that fund investors will bear the increased compliance costs associated with the rule change.

...

Read More

Deal Diary

May 31, 2023

As discussed in our prior publication (found here), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments on December 14, 2022, regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures. On May 25, 2023, the SEC issued three new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) relating to the Rule 10b5-1 amendments.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.