National Institutes of Health Develops AI Algorithm to Identify Potential Volunteers for Clinical Trials

November 25, 2024

Reading Time : 2 min

Researchers from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have developed an algorithm that harnesses AI to help accelerate the process of matching potential volunteers for relevant clinical research trials. The algorithm, called TrialGPT, is intended to help clinicians navigate the vast range of clinical trials available to patients by identifying potential matches and providing a summary of how that person meets the criteria for study enrollment. The team of researchers used a large language model (LLM) to develop an innovative framework for TrialGPT and compared the algorithm to the results of three human clinicians who analyzed over 1,000 patient-criterion pairs. The team also conducted a pilot user study, where two human clinicians reviewed six anonymous patient summaries and matched them to potentially suitable clinical trials. When clinicians used TrialGPT as a starting point, they spent 40% less time screening patients and maintained the same level of accuracy. The research team was selected for the Director’s Challenge Innovation Award, which will allow the team to further assess the model’s performance and fairness in real-world clinical settings. The researchers “anticipate that this work could make clinical trial recruitment more effective and help reduce barriers to participation for populations underrepresented in clinical research.”

A tool similar to TrialGPT could be used by life sciences companies as they work to ensure that patient selection for their research studies is adequately diverse. One of FDA’s priorities is to advance health equity by promoting clinical trial diversity. Participants in clinical trials should represent the patients that will use the medical products, but that is often not the case. FDA has issued recommendations to improve inclusion of underrepresented populations in clinical trials, including guidance in 2019 and 2020. Now under the Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act of 2022 (FDORA), sponsors must submit “Diversity Action Plans” for certain clinical studies in the form and manner specified by FDA. These Diversity Action Plans are intended to increase enrollment of participants who are members of historically underrepresented populations in clinical studies to help improve the strength and generalizability of the evidence for the intended use population. As part of the agency’s June 2024 draft guidance regarding Diversity Action Plans, FDA offered examples of ways sponsors could satisfy the requirement to explain how the sponsor plans to meet specified enrollment goals, including community engagement, improving access by selecting sites that serve demographically diverse populations, employing clinical study decentralization when appropriate, and improving study awareness. One way to expand study awareness among clinicians and patients would be to employ an algorithm like TrialGPT.

Although all AI/ML-enabled medical devices would not necessarily be required to submit Diversity Action Plans under FDORA (the requirement only applies to device studies requiring an Investigational Device Exemption), FDA has repeatedly warned of the risk of the potential for bias in AI/ML-based medical devices. Perhaps another AI tool that helps to identify suitable study participants from underrepresented populations could be used to address algorithmic bias.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Eye on FDA

December 22, 2025

On December 18, 2025, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a final guidance entitled “Processes and Practices Applicable to Bioresearch Monitoring Inspections.” The guidance was issued to comply with the Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act of 2022, which directs FDA to issue guidance describing the processes and practices applicable to inspections of sites and facilities inspected under FDA’s Bioresearch Monitoring (BIMO) inspection program, to the extent that is not covered in already available FDA guides and manuals. The BIMO program was established to assess and monitor the conduct and reporting of FDA-regulated research as well as postmarketing activities through on-site inspections, investigations and Remote Regulatory Assessments.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

December 15, 2025

On December 5, 2025, FDA announced its Technology-Enabled Meaningful Patient Outcomes (TEMPO) for Digital Health Devices Pilot, a new voluntary pilot that seeks to accelerate innovation and expand access to digital health devices for people living with chronic conditions. Under TEMPO, FDA will evaluate a new, risk-based enforcement approach that supports digital health devices intended for use to improve patient outcomes in cardio-kidney-metabolic, musculoskeletal and behavioral health conditions. Under the pilot, participating manufacturers may request that the agency exercise enforcement discretion for certain requirements, such as premarket authorization and investigational device requirements, while manufacturers collect and share real-world data demonstrating the device’s performance.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

November 5, 2025

Last week, FDA released draft guidance titled “Scientific Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Product: Updated Recommendations for Assessing the Need for Comparative Efficacy Studies.” This draft guidance reflects an evolution in FDA’s approach to determining whether a comparative clinical study with efficacy endpoints (a comparative efficacy study or CES) is necessary to support a demonstration of biosimilarity. Specifically, the agency notes that a comparative analytical assessment (CAA) is generally more sensitive when it comes to detecting differences between products than a CES.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

October 27, 2025

On October 23, 2025, FDA released its final guidance regarding Patient-Focused Drug Development: Selecting, Developing, or Modifying Fit-for-Purpose Clinical Outcome Assessments. The guidance is the third guidance in a four-part series of FDA guidance focused on patient-focused drug development (PFDD) that describe how stakeholders, such as patients, caregivers, researchers, medical product developers and others can submit patient experience data and other relevant information that can be used for medical product development and regulatory decision making.

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.