Three Questions with Sedgwick’s Jeremy Schutz

December 4, 2024Three Questions

Reading Time : 2 min

In this edition of Three Questions, health care & life sciences partner Nate Brown spoke with Jeremy Schutz, director of business development, recall & remediation at Sedgwick, to explore key strategies that pharmaceutical companies and medical device manufacturers can adopt to mitigate risks related to supply chain disruptions, cybersecurity threats and increased FDA enforcement of quality control and compliance.

Sedgwick is the world’s leading expert in product recall and remediation spanning over 7,000 recalls, in 100 countries, and 50 languages.

What operational strategies can pharmaceutical companies adopt to mitigate the risks of supply chain disruptions?

In 2024, supply chain disruptions continue to be a significant risk for pharmaceutical companies, especially in the context of global component and ingredient shortages and transportation challenges. Companies should adopt a risk-based approach by diversifying their supplier base, investing in domestic production and building stronger supplier relationships to improve resilience. Real-time supply chain monitoring through digital tools like blockchain can help companies track and predict potential bottlenecks. For 2025, stakeholders should watch for increased regulatory pressure from the FDA to ensure supply chain transparency and resilience, particularly for essential drugs and devices critical to patient health.

How can medical device manufacturers minimize the risk of cybersecurity threats?

With the FDA’s new and stricter cybersecurity regulations, medical device manufacturers face increased risks. Manufacturers must integrate cybersecurity protocols early in the product development process, ensuring compliance with FDA guidelines for cybersecurity risk management. This includes secure software development, regular updates, vulnerability monitoring and patch management. Manufacturers should also establish post-market cybersecurity monitoring programs. Looking ahead to 2025, the FDA is expected to intensify its focus on artificial intelligence (AI)-driven medical devices and cybersecurity for wearables, which will require manufacturers to maintain a proactive cybersecurity strategy to prevent costly disruptions and recalls.

How can life sciences companies mitigate the risks associated with increased FDA enforcement of quality control and compliance?

In 2024, the FDA has ramped up inspections and enforcement actions, especially related to quality control in manufacturing processes for both pharmaceuticals and medical devices. To mitigate risks, companies should implement continuous quality improvement (CQI) processes, ensuring that manufacturing standards meet Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and FDA regulations. This includes regular internal audits, employee training on compliance and investing in digital quality management systems (QMS) that provide real-time monitoring and documentation of production processes. As we approach 2025, companies should anticipate more FDA scrutiny on data integrity and digital record-keeping, making it essential to maintain robust data security and transparency throughout the product lifecycle.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Eye on FDA

May 12, 2025

On May 9, 2025, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted three color additive petitions, approving two new colorings and expanding one existing approval. These approvals come after the agency’s announcement last month to phase out all petroleum-based synthetic dyes in food by the end of 2026 and transition to natural alternatives (see our post here). Under section 721 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), color additives (unless exempt from batch certification) are subject to FDA approval to determine their safety for use in food. The agency evaluates the safety of color additives based on multiple factors including projected human dietary exposure to the additive, toxicological data, and other relevant information. Once FDA approves a color additive petition, any manufacturer can use the additive in foods for the approved intended uses.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

May 8, 2025

In the last two weeks, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has filled key artificial intelligence (AI) positions at HHS and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These appointments, as well as recent statements from HHS and FDA leadership, align with the Trump administration’s intention to use AI to improve regulatory efficiency at HHS and beyond.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

April 23, 2025

This week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in collaboration with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), announced a series of new measures to phase out all petroleum-based synthetic dyes in food by the end of 2026. This initiative is part of the broader “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) agenda aimed at bolstering food safety. Citing growing concerns about the potential role of petroleum-based food dyes in childhood diabetes, obesity, depression and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the agency plans to establish a national standard and timeline for the food industry to transition to natural alternatives.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

April 16, 2025

On April 10, 2025, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced its plan to replace animal testing in the development of monoclonal antibody therapies and other drugs in one of the first announcements by the agency since Commissioner Makary was confirmed to lead it. In its announcement, FDA highlighted that this more modern approach is designed to improve drug safety and accelerate the evaluation process, while also reducing animal experimentation, lowering research and development costs, and lowering drug prices.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

April 2, 2025

On March 31, 2025, Judge Sean D. Jordan of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued an opinion and judgment in American Clinical Laboratory Association v. FDA. Judge Jordan’s decision vacates and sets aside the Food & Drug Administration’s (FDA) final rule, Medical Devices; Laboratory Developed Tests (the LDT Rule).1 The LDT Rule would have required laboratories offering LDTs to meet medical device requirements. The preamble to the LDT Rule provided a multi-stage phase out of FDA’s enforcement discretion policy, under which the first set of regulatory requirements would have been actively enforced beginning May 6. While many labs are breathing a sigh of relief after the publication of this order, questions remain as to how the agency will proceed and the broader implications for regulation of lab tests and in vitro diagnostics generally.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

March 24, 2025

In the past week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in collaboration with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced three new initiatives related to food safety and food supply chain transparency. Outlined below, these new initiatives align with HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s recent announcements to focus on bolstering food safety, including the recent directive to the FDA to explore the revision of the longstanding Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) rule.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

March 12, 2025

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has updated its website to provide new information on data integrity concerns relating to medical devices.

...

Read More

Eye on FDA

March 12, 2025

United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kennedy recently directed the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to consider rulemaking to revise its longstanding regulations and guidance governing the oversight of food ingredients to eliminate the ability of individuals and companies to self-affirm that their ingredients are Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS). This would mark a massive shift in how new food ingredients are introduced to the market.

...

Read More

© 2025 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.