An RTO for Gas?

Apr 2, 2014

Reading Time : 1 min

Among other issues, FERC has focused on the performance of the gas pipeline transportation system during these events.  According to FERC staff’s preliminary analysis, customers who had firm transportation capacity on natural gas pipelines generally managed to secure natural gas deliveries. However, many gas-fired generators rely on interruptible transportation, and fuel supply issues forced many of these units offline.

At the technical conference, the participants discussed FERC’s recent initiatives to improve coordination of the scheduling processes of interstate pipelines, public utilities, and ISOs / RTOs, and its recent show cause order regarding posting by interstate pipelines of offers to purchase released capacity. In addition, Commissioner Norris suggested the possibility of a rulemaking to establish a new natural gas trading platform. Commissioner Norris’s statement came in response to comments from Donald Sipe, of American Forest and Paper, regarding the need for improved information sharing and trading practices. Could we be headed toward the establishment of an RTO for gas?

Many commenters emphasized that, in addition to optimizing the existing natural gas transportation network, new infrastructure will be needed to support our increasing reliance on gas-fired generation. Audrey Zibelman, Chair of the New York Public Service Commission, suggested that expedited permitting processes may be appropriate in some cases to alleviate shortages and scarcity pricing.

In addition, several commenters, including Donald Schneider of FirstEnergy Solutions and John Sturm of ACES Power Marketing, pointed out that organized capacity markets, as currently structured, do not recognize the value of fuel diversity. Commissioner Moeller expressed particular interest in the premature retirement of existing coal-fired resources due to environmental regulations. At the close of the technical conference, Commissioner LaFleur, FERC’s acting chair, suggested that more study may be warranted with respect to recognizing the benefits of “fuel security” and “fuel diversity” in capacity prices.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

June 25, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to the California Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO) directing CAISO and CAISO transmission owners to show cause as to why CAISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (California Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., 195 FERC ¶ 61,214 (2026) (the Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 24, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to New York Independent System Operator, Inc. (NYISO) directing NYISO and NYISO transmission owners to show cause as to why NYISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (New York Independent System Operator, Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,216 (2026) (Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 23, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO) directing MISO and MISO transmission owners to show cause as to why MISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,212 (2026) (Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 23, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. directing PJM and PJM transmission owners to show cause as to why PJM’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 195 FERC ¶ 61,211 (2026) (the Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.