Biden Vows to Marry Climate, Jobs on “Climate Day”

Jan 28, 2021

Reading Time : 5 min

By: Kenneth J. Markowitz, Stacey H. Mitchell, Christopher A. Treanor, Shawn Whites (Energy Regulatory Specialist)

Yesterday’s actions—two executive orders and a presidential memorandum—provided further detail on the President’s roadmap for achieving a carbon pollution-free power sector by 2035 and setting the country on an “irreversible” path to a net-zero emissions economy by 2050 without sacrificing economic growth. Flanking the President at the Climate Day press conference were Gina McCarthy, the National Climate Advisor and chair of the new National Climate Task Force that oversees the domestic climate agenda, and John Kerry, the new Special Presidential Envoy for Climate who oversees international climate policy.

To help organize the roughly 33 pages of directives to federal agencies, we identified seven cross-cutting themes from the Climate Day actions: (i) national security; (ii) international leadership; (iii) job creation; (iv) energy sector; (v) domestic sustainability; (vi) environmental justice; and (vii) science-based decision-making. Under each theme below, we list relevant key actions from yesterday’s events. During the coming days, we will dive deeper into these themes.

National Security

  • Provides climate change a seat on the National Security Council through the Special Presidential Envoy for Climate.
  • Directs the Director of National Intelligence to prepare a National Intelligence Estimate on the security implications of climate change.
  • Directs the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security and Joint Chiefs of Staff to study the security implications of climate change, to be incorporated into defense strategies, guidance documents, risk assessments and similar analyses.
  • Revives a 2016 memorandum issued by President Obama that ensures that federal agencies fully consider climate change-related impacts in the development of national security doctrine, policies and plans.

International Leadership

  • Announces a Leaders’ Climate Summit to be held on Earth Day (April 22) to prepare for COP-26, and aims to announce a new U.S. Nationally Determined Contribution by that Summit.
  • Advances the United States’ ratification of the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol regarding the phasedown of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)—gases that replace ozone-depleting substances but have substantial global warming potential.
  • Commits the United States to developing a climate finance plan to assist developing countries in their emissions reduction efforts, environmental protection efforts and climate-aligned investments.
  • Prioritizes ending international financing of carbon-intensive fossil fuel-based energy while advancing sustainable development and a green recovery.
  • Reconvenes the Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate to pursue green recovery efforts, initiatives to advance the clean energy transition, sectoral decarbonization and alignment of financial flows with the objectives of the Paris Agreement, including with respect to coal financing.

Job Creation

  • Directs federal agencies to procure carbon pollution-free electricity and zero-emission vehicles to create jobs and stimulate clean energy industries, consistent with the President’s Buy American Executive Order.
  • Directs federal agencies to identify opportunities for federal funding to spur innovation, commercialization and deployment of clean energy technologies and infrastructure, and ensure that federal funding is used in that manner.
  • Calls for the establishment of a new Civilian Climate Corps Initiative to create jobs that conserve and restore public lands and waters, support community resiliency, increase reforestation, increase carbon sequestration in the agricultural sector, protect biodiversity, improve recreation access and address climate change.
  • Establishes a new Interagency Working Group on Coal and Power Plant Communities and Economic Revitalization, which will advance federally funded projects—such as plugging abandoned wells and reclaiming abandoned mine land—that support communities most affected by the energy transition. Notably, in the press conference announcing these initiatives, the President emphasized (1) his administration will not ban fracking; (2) capping abandoned oil and gas wells, reclaiming mines and turning “old brownfield sites into new hubs of economic growth” would create jobs; and (3) he would “do right” by fossil fuel workers by making sure they have the “opportunities to keep building the nation in their own communities and getting paid well for it.”

Energy Sector

  • Directs the Department of Interior to pause new oil and natural gas leases on public lands or in offshore waters, pending its completion of a comprehensive review and reconsideration of federal oil and gas permitting and leasing practices. The review will cover potential climate and other impacts associated with oil and gas activities, and discuss whether to adjust royalties associated with coal, oil and gas extraction (or take other action) so as to account for corresponding climate costs.
  • Directs federal agencies to identify any fossil fuel subsidies they provide, then take steps to ensure that federal funding is not directly subsidizing fossil fuels. In addition, the Office of Management and Budget must seek to eliminate fossil fuel subsidies from the budget request for Fiscal Year 2022 and thereafter.
  • Directs the Department of Interior to review siting and permitting processes on public lands and in offshore waters to increase renewable energy production on those lands and in those waters, with the goal of doubling offshore wind production (or, more realistically, doubling the amount of available leases) by 2030.

Domestic Sustainability

  • Prioritizes transitioning to a clean or zero-emission vehicle fleet for federal, state, local and Tribal governments.
  • Directs the Council on Environmental Quality and Office of Management and Budget to (1) ensure that federal infrastructure investment reduces climate pollution and (2) require that federal permitting decisions consider the effects of greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. They will also review siting and permitting processes and identify steps that can be taken to accelerate the deployment of clean energy and transmission projects.
  • Directs the Department of Agriculture to encourage the voluntary adoption of “climate-smart” agricultural and forestry practices that decrease wildfire risk and result in additional, measurable and verifiable carbon reductions and sequestration.

Environmental Justice

  • Establishes a White House Environmental Justice Interagency Council and a White House Environmental Justice Advisory Council to prioritize environmental justice and ensure a whole-of-government approach to addressing current and historical environmental injustices.
  • Creates a government-wide Justice40 Initiative with the goal of delivering 40 percent of the overall benefits of relevant federal investments to disadvantaged communities, and tracks performance toward that goal through the establishment of an Environmental Justice Scorecard, to be posted on a public government website.
  • Initiates the development of a Climate and Environmental Justice Screening Tool, building off of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s EJSCREEN, to identify disadvantaged communities, support the Justice40 Initiative and inform equitable decision-making across the federal government.
  • Directs the U.S. Attorney General to consider creating an Office of Environmental Justice and to coordinate with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to develop a comprehensive environmental justice enforcement strategy that remedies systemic environmental harms.

Science-Based Decision-Making

  • Re-establishes the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), which will advise the President on policy that affects science, technology and innovation. The PCAST will be co-chaired by the President’s Science Advisor (President Biden has nominated geneticist Eric Lander for the post, and it will be a cabinet-level position for the first time), and the remaining members will be from outside the government and “have diverse perspectives and expertise in science, technology, and innovation.”
  • Charges the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy (President Biden also nominated Eric Lander for this post) with the responsibility for ensuring scientific integrity across federal agencies.
  • Tasks agencies that oversee, direct, or fund research with designating a senior agency employee as Chief Science Officer to ensure agency research programs are “scientifically and technologically well-founded and conducted with integrity.”

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

July 8, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to ISO New England Inc. (ISO-NE) directing ISO-NE and ISO-NE participating transmission owners to show cause as to why ISO-NE’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (ISO New England Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,215 (2026) (Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 7, 2026

On June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court granted a petition for certiorari in Leonard Hoffmann v. WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. (Hoffmann), which presents the question whether section 7 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) requires pipeline companies using federal eminent domain authority to pay landowners’ attorney’s fees in states where landowners can recover those fees under state law. In the decision giving rise to the Supreme Court’s review, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that a group of ranchers were not entitled to recover their $383,300 in attorney’s fees incurred while negotiating their compensation—creating a circuit split with four other courts of appeals. Hoffmann will be heard during the Court’s October 2026 Term, and marks the second time in five years that the Court has agreed to interpret NGA section 7.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 6, 2026

On June 29, 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued Trump v. Slaughter, fundamentally reshaping presidential removal authority over independent regulatory agencies. The decision overruled a 90-year-old precedent established in Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, which had upheld the constitutionality of commissioner removal protections in the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act). As written, the FTC Act permits a commissioner’s removal “only for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” In Slaughter, the Court was asked to reevaluate this standard following the President’s removal of a Democratic-appointed FTC commissioner from office in 2025 without cause. Finding for the President, the Court held that removal was permissible because the FTC Act’s for-cause removal protections for commissioners violate the separation of powers, specifically, the President’s removal power under Article II. The Court explained that the FTC exercises executive power because it promulgates binding rules, investigates and enforces those rules through administrative adjudications, and brings civil enforcement actions in federal court. It found that because it exercises these executive powers, its commissioners “must therefore be controlled by the Chief Executive, in whom such power is vested.” While previous recent cases addressing the scope of the Removal Power, Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Collins v. Yellen purported to preserve some kernel of Humphrey’s, the Court made clear that “[i]f anything more is left of Humphrey’s, we overrule it.”

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 25, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to the California Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO) directing CAISO and CAISO transmission owners to show cause as to why CAISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (California Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., 195 FERC ¶ 61,214 (2026) (the Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.