Distressed Asset Acquisitions Outside Bankruptcy in the Oil and Gas Space

Mar 2, 2016

Reading Time : 2 min

The most notable advantage associated with Section 363 sales is the ability to acquire assets free and clear of liens and most liabilities. Nevertheless, certain drawbacks do exist, including the length of the auction process, which can last up to 90 days, and the negative publicity associated with bankruptcies, which can potentially further harm asset value. In addition, because the goal of a Section 363 sale is to obtain the highest and best price, a buyer may ultimately pay more than in a private transaction.4

Unrestricted by the bankruptcy process, non-363 sales can move quickly, are afforded greater confidentiality and may result in a lower purchase price. However, despite these advantages, major risks exist. Specifically, to preserve asset value, distressed deals look to close as quickly as possible. This urgency consequently limits the amount of due diligence that can be conducted, creating a risk that impacts a buyer’s ability to effectively evaluate the assets, the purchase price and potential future liability. In anondistressed sale, parties can include representations and warranties to protect against an expedited diligence process. However, in a distressed sale, the representations and warranties of a company teetering on the edge of bankruptcy may inspire little confidence. To protect against this uncertainty, buyers may obtain third-party guarantees from a parent or shareholders, or, if feasible, M&A insurance to mitigate the risks.5 Finally, given that the counterparty may still face bankruptcy after the sale, particular attention will need to be paid to drafting a process to help ameliorate potential risks related to fraudulent conveyances.

According to a recentDeloitte report, 175 production companies, or nearly 35 percent of publicly traded exploration and production (E&P) companies worldwide, are considered “high risk” based on their combination of high-leverage and low-debt service coverage ratios.6 An additional 160 companies, which are less leveraged, but face serious cashflow problems, also face an uncertain future.7 Given the situation of most companies, as the markets continue to languish, many investors will look to acquire productive assets at low prices. While non-363 sales do present challenges, the ability to quickly move on attractive assets at low prices may prove appealing to potential acquisitive parties. 


1 http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/71f9de36-d6b7-11e5-969e-9d801cf5e15b.html#axzz41hFbv5Du

2 http://www.rigzone.com/news/oil_gas/a/143261/Asset_Sales_Dominate_As_US_Energy_Sector_Steers_Clear_Of_Big_Deals#

3 http://www2.deloitte.com/ru/en/pages/energy-and-resources/articles/2016/the-crude-downturn-exploration-production.html

4 http://us.practicallaw.com/1-385-0115?q=363+sales

5 http://conwaymackenzie.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/SMIDT_JCR_JanFeb2015.pdf

6 http://www2.deloitte.com/ru/en/pages/energy-and-resources/articles/2016/the-crude-downturn-exploration-production.html

7 http://www2.deloitte.com/ru/en/pages/energy-and-resources/articles/2016/the-crude-downturn-exploration-production.html

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

July 8, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to ISO New England Inc. (ISO-NE) directing ISO-NE and ISO-NE participating transmission owners to show cause as to why ISO-NE’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (ISO New England Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,215 (2026) (Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 7, 2026

On June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court granted a petition for certiorari in Leonard Hoffmann v. WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. (Hoffmann), which presents the question whether section 7 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) requires pipeline companies using federal eminent domain authority to pay landowners’ attorney’s fees in states where landowners can recover those fees under state law. In the decision giving rise to the Supreme Court’s review, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that a group of ranchers were not entitled to recover their $383,300 in attorney’s fees incurred while negotiating their compensation—creating a circuit split with four other courts of appeals. Hoffmann will be heard during the Court’s October 2026 Term, and marks the second time in five years that the Court has agreed to interpret NGA section 7.

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

July 6, 2026

On June 29, 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued Trump v. Slaughter, fundamentally reshaping presidential removal authority over independent regulatory agencies. The decision overruled a 90-year-old precedent established in Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, which had upheld the constitutionality of commissioner removal protections in the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act). As written, the FTC Act permits a commissioner’s removal “only for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” In Slaughter, the Court was asked to reevaluate this standard following the President’s removal of a Democratic-appointed FTC commissioner from office in 2025 without cause. Finding for the President, the Court held that removal was permissible because the FTC Act’s for-cause removal protections for commissioners violate the separation of powers, specifically, the President’s removal power under Article II. The Court explained that the FTC exercises executive power because it promulgates binding rules, investigates and enforces those rules through administrative adjudications, and brings civil enforcement actions in federal court. It found that because it exercises these executive powers, its commissioners “must therefore be controlled by the Chief Executive, in whom such power is vested.” While previous recent cases addressing the scope of the Removal Power, Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Collins v. Yellen purported to preserve some kernel of Humphrey’s, the Court made clear that “[i]f anything more is left of Humphrey’s, we overrule it.”

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 25, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to the California Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO) directing CAISO and CAISO transmission owners to show cause as to why CAISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (California Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., 195 FERC ¶ 61,214 (2026) (the Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.