Distressed Asset Acquisitions Outside Bankruptcy in the Oil and Gas Space

Mar 2, 2016

Reading Time : 2 min

The most notable advantage associated with Section 363 sales is the ability to acquire assets free and clear of liens and most liabilities. Nevertheless, certain drawbacks do exist, including the length of the auction process, which can last up to 90 days, and the negative publicity associated with bankruptcies, which can potentially further harm asset value. In addition, because the goal of a Section 363 sale is to obtain the highest and best price, a buyer may ultimately pay more than in a private transaction.4

Unrestricted by the bankruptcy process, non-363 sales can move quickly, are afforded greater confidentiality and may result in a lower purchase price. However, despite these advantages, major risks exist. Specifically, to preserve asset value, distressed deals look to close as quickly as possible. This urgency consequently limits the amount of due diligence that can be conducted, creating a risk that impacts a buyer’s ability to effectively evaluate the assets, the purchase price and potential future liability. In anondistressed sale, parties can include representations and warranties to protect against an expedited diligence process. However, in a distressed sale, the representations and warranties of a company teetering on the edge of bankruptcy may inspire little confidence. To protect against this uncertainty, buyers may obtain third-party guarantees from a parent or shareholders, or, if feasible, M&A insurance to mitigate the risks.5 Finally, given that the counterparty may still face bankruptcy after the sale, particular attention will need to be paid to drafting a process to help ameliorate potential risks related to fraudulent conveyances.

According to a recentDeloitte report, 175 production companies, or nearly 35 percent of publicly traded exploration and production (E&P) companies worldwide, are considered “high risk” based on their combination of high-leverage and low-debt service coverage ratios.6 An additional 160 companies, which are less leveraged, but face serious cashflow problems, also face an uncertain future.7 Given the situation of most companies, as the markets continue to languish, many investors will look to acquire productive assets at low prices. While non-363 sales do present challenges, the ability to quickly move on attractive assets at low prices may prove appealing to potential acquisitive parties. 


1 http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/71f9de36-d6b7-11e5-969e-9d801cf5e15b.html#axzz41hFbv5Du

2 http://www.rigzone.com/news/oil_gas/a/143261/Asset_Sales_Dominate_As_US_Energy_Sector_Steers_Clear_Of_Big_Deals#

3 http://www2.deloitte.com/ru/en/pages/energy-and-resources/articles/2016/the-crude-downturn-exploration-production.html

4 http://us.practicallaw.com/1-385-0115?q=363+sales

5 http://conwaymackenzie.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/SMIDT_JCR_JanFeb2015.pdf

6 http://www2.deloitte.com/ru/en/pages/energy-and-resources/articles/2016/the-crude-downturn-exploration-production.html

7 http://www2.deloitte.com/ru/en/pages/energy-and-resources/articles/2016/the-crude-downturn-exploration-production.html

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

June 23, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO) directing MISO and MISO transmission owners to show cause as to why MISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,212 (2026) (Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 23, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. directing PJM and PJM transmission owners to show cause as to why PJM’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 195 FERC ¶ 61,211 (2026) (the Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 22, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP) directing SPP and SPP transmission owners to show cause as to why SPP’s tariff should not be unjust and unreasonable (Southwest Power Pool, Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,213 (2026) (Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 18, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued show cause orders under section 206 of the Federal Power Act to PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM), Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO), Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP), California Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO), ISO New England Inc. (ISO-NE) and New York Independent System Operator, Inc. (NYISO), together with their transmission owners, directing each region to justify or reform the tariff provisions governing how data centers and other large loads connect to and receive service from the transmission grid. The orders are part of FERC’s broader response to rapidly increasing electricity demand, particularly from data centers and other large loads, and advance the objectives of the Secretary of Energy’s October 2025 Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANOPR) by seeking to accelerate “speed to power” while preserving grid reliability, affordability and consumer protections. 

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.