FERC and American Transmission Company Settle on $205,000 Penalty for Violations of Sections 203 and 205 of the Federal Power Act

Aug 30, 2017

Reading Time : 1 min

OE’s investigation focused on 21 asset transfers between August 2006 and February 2014 for which ATC failed to obtain prior authorization under Section 203 of the FPA and 42 instances between October 2000 and May 2011 in which ATC failed to timely file FERC-jurisdictional agreements or notices of termination of FERC-jurisdictional agreements under Section 205 of the FPA. Under the Stipulation and Consent Agreement, ATC admits the violations, agrees to a civil penalty of $205,000—after paying approximately $1.4 million in refunds to customers,and agrees to implement measures designed to ensure future compliance with its Section 203 and 205 obligations, including filing semiannual compliance monitoring reports for one year. (The Stipulation and Consent Agreement also describes numerous compliance program improvements that ATC has already implemented.)

In its order, FERC noted that ATC’s violations, while not willful, resulted from its failure to maintain an effective regulatory compliance program and created a lack of transparency in the market. Factors that FERC considered in determining ATC’s penalty included “the significant volume of transactions and agreements that were not timely submitted to the Commission; the multi-year duration of the violations; ATC’s self-reporting of the violations; the absence of direct harm caused by these violations; ATC’s cooperation and admission of its violations; and ATC’s resolution of this investigation without a hearing.”  FERC also emphasized “the importance of the obligation to file with the Commission all required rates and charges for jurisdictional services and all contracts and agreements relating to such services subject to FPA section 205 and to obtain authorization for all transactions subject to FPA section 203 . . . .”

ATC’s penalty, while comparatively modest, again underscores the importance of maintaining a robust FERC compliance program capable of identifying and ensuring compliance with applicable Section 203 and 205 requirements, as well as the potential value in FERC’s penalty calculus of self-reporting, cooperation with OE and admission of violations.

Share This Insight

Previous Entries

Speaking Energy

June 23, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO) directing MISO and MISO transmission owners to show cause as to why MISO’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,212 (2026) (Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 23, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. directing PJM and PJM transmission owners to show cause as to why PJM’s tariff should not be found to be unjust and unreasonable (PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 195 FERC ¶ 61,211 (2026) (the Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 22, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued an order to Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP) directing SPP and SPP transmission owners to show cause as to why SPP’s tariff should not be unjust and unreasonable (Southwest Power Pool, Inc., 195 FERC ¶ 61,213 (2026) (Order)) because it fails to sufficiently:

...

Read More

Speaking Energy

June 18, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or the Commission) issued show cause orders under section 206 of the Federal Power Act to PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM), Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO), Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP), California Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO), ISO New England Inc. (ISO-NE) and New York Independent System Operator, Inc. (NYISO), together with their transmission owners, directing each region to justify or reform the tariff provisions governing how data centers and other large loads connect to and receive service from the transmission grid. The orders are part of FERC’s broader response to rapidly increasing electricity demand, particularly from data centers and other large loads, and advance the objectives of the Secretary of Energy’s October 2025 Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANOPR) by seeking to accelerate “speed to power” while preserving grid reliability, affordability and consumer protections. 

...

Read More

© 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. All rights reserved. Attorney advertising. This document is distributed for informational use only; it does not constitute legal advice and should not be used as such. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Akin is the practicing name of Akin Gump LLP, a New York limited liability partnership authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number 267321. A list of the partners is available for inspection at Eighth Floor, Ten Bishops Square, London E1 6EG. For more information about Akin Gump LLP, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and other associated entities under which the Akin Gump network operates worldwide, please see our Legal Notices page.